农村医疗服务机构医护人员的健康状况如何?横断面研究

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Kristy A Bolton , Penny Fraser , Steven Allender , Rohan Fitzgerald , Susan Brumby
{"title":"农村医疗服务机构医护人员的健康状况如何?横断面研究","authors":"Kristy A Bolton ,&nbsp;Penny Fraser ,&nbsp;Steven Allender ,&nbsp;Rohan Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Susan Brumby","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the need to understand the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers in hospital settings. Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic create poor health outcomes for healthcare workers, yet little is understood about underlying patterns of modifiable health determinants.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to examine the health and wellbeing data of healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and inform future healthy intervention activities within the workplace.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Repeat cross-sectional study pre-2018 and mid-COVID-19 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>Rural health service in Victoria, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>All 800 healthcare workers within the health service were invited; of these, 184 (23%) participated at Time 1 and 87 (11%) at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Diet, physical activity, sleep behaviours, and psychological distress were collected via online survey in Qualtrics. Pre-COVID-19 pandemic, anthropometry (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes risk were collected by a trained practitioner. However, to reduce burden on healthcare workers mid-COVID-19 pandemic, only self-reported anthropometry was collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of participants were Australian-born females (84% at both timepoints) with half over the age of 45 (63% Time 1, 53% Time 2). Around half worked part-time (49% Time 1, 54% Time 2), over a third full-time (39% Time 1, 36% Time 2), and the majority reported working regular day shifts in the past 3 months (70% Time 1, 65% Time 2). Among this sample, there were few smokers (9% Time 1, 7% Time 2), and two thirds of participants were living with overweight or obesity (64% Time 1, 67% Time 2). Across both time points, compliance with health guidelines was low; 41% (Time 1) and 42% (Time 2) met fruit, 17% (Time 1) and 12% (Time 2) met vegetable, and just under 50% met physical activity guidelines at both time points. Those reporting moderate to very high levels of psychological stress increased from 42% (Time 1) to 59% (Time 2) (<em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> 0.05). At Time 1, &gt;80% were at intermediate (39%) or high (33%) risk of developing type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years; and a third (32%) were hypertensive. Reasons for physical inactivity at work included already exercising out-of-work hours (28%), living too far from work (18%), available time (9%), and inflexible work hours (8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several high-risk health areas along with opportunities for supporting improved wellbeing were identified in this group of healthcare workers. Psychological distress of healthcare workers urgently needs to be addressed, and this is reinforced by the need to understand the longitudinal impact of COVID-19 on the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers. Workplace settings, such as a health service, is an ideal setting to invest in healthcare workers with individual, organisational, and broader community benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000134/pdfft?md5=b9c79e8fabb92645d093c583c1ea36f8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How healthy are the healthcare staff in a rural health service? A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Kristy A Bolton ,&nbsp;Penny Fraser ,&nbsp;Steven Allender ,&nbsp;Rohan Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Susan Brumby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the need to understand the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers in hospital settings. Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic create poor health outcomes for healthcare workers, yet little is understood about underlying patterns of modifiable health determinants.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to examine the health and wellbeing data of healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and inform future healthy intervention activities within the workplace.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Repeat cross-sectional study pre-2018 and mid-COVID-19 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>Rural health service in Victoria, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>All 800 healthcare workers within the health service were invited; of these, 184 (23%) participated at Time 1 and 87 (11%) at Time 2.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Diet, physical activity, sleep behaviours, and psychological distress were collected via online survey in Qualtrics. Pre-COVID-19 pandemic, anthropometry (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes risk were collected by a trained practitioner. However, to reduce burden on healthcare workers mid-COVID-19 pandemic, only self-reported anthropometry was collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of participants were Australian-born females (84% at both timepoints) with half over the age of 45 (63% Time 1, 53% Time 2). Around half worked part-time (49% Time 1, 54% Time 2), over a third full-time (39% Time 1, 36% Time 2), and the majority reported working regular day shifts in the past 3 months (70% Time 1, 65% Time 2). Among this sample, there were few smokers (9% Time 1, 7% Time 2), and two thirds of participants were living with overweight or obesity (64% Time 1, 67% Time 2). Across both time points, compliance with health guidelines was low; 41% (Time 1) and 42% (Time 2) met fruit, 17% (Time 1) and 12% (Time 2) met vegetable, and just under 50% met physical activity guidelines at both time points. Those reporting moderate to very high levels of psychological stress increased from 42% (Time 1) to 59% (Time 2) (<em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> 0.05). At Time 1, &gt;80% were at intermediate (39%) or high (33%) risk of developing type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years; and a third (32%) were hypertensive. Reasons for physical inactivity at work included already exercising out-of-work hours (28%), living too far from work (18%), available time (9%), and inflexible work hours (8%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several high-risk health areas along with opportunities for supporting improved wellbeing were identified in this group of healthcare workers. Psychological distress of healthcare workers urgently needs to be addressed, and this is reinforced by the need to understand the longitudinal impact of COVID-19 on the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers. Workplace settings, such as a health service, is an ideal setting to invest in healthcare workers with individual, organisational, and broader community benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000134/pdfft?md5=b9c79e8fabb92645d093c583c1ea36f8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000134-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19大流行使人们更加需要了解医院环境中医护人员的健康和福祉。COVID-19大流行等危机给医护人员造成了不良的健康后果,但人们对可改变的健康决定因素的基本模式却知之甚少。研究目的研究COVID-19大流行之前和期间医护人员的健康和福利数据,为未来工作场所的健康干预活动提供信息。设计2018年之前和2020年COVID-19中期的重复横断面研究.地点澳大利亚维多利亚州的农村医疗服务机构.参与者医疗服务机构的所有800名医护人员均受邀参加;其中184人(23%)在时间1参加了研究,87人(11%)在时间2参加了研究.方法通过Qualtrics的在线调查收集饮食、体育锻炼、睡眠行为和心理困扰。COVID-19大流行前的人体测量(身高、体重、腰围、血压)和2型糖尿病风险由受过培训的医生收集。结果大多数参与者是在澳大利亚出生的女性(两个时间点均为 84%),其中一半年龄在 45 岁以上(63% 时间点 1,53% 时间点 2)。约半数人从事兼职工作(时间 1 为 49%,时间 2 为 54%),超过三分之一的人从事全职工作(时间 1 为 39%,时间 2 为 36%),大多数人表示在过去 3 个月中经常上白班(时间 1 为 70%,时间 2 为 65%)。在这些样本中,吸烟者很少(时间 1:9%;时间 2:7%),三分之二的参与者超重或肥胖(时间 1:64%;时间 2:67%)。在两个时间点上,健康指南的合规率都很低;在两个时间点上,41%(时间 1)和 42%(时间 2)的人符合水果指南,17%(时间 1)和 12%(时间 2)的人符合蔬菜指南,略低于 50%的人符合体育锻炼指南。报告有中度至高度心理压力的人从 42%(时间 1)增加到 59%(时间 2)(p <0.05)。在时间 1,80% 的人在未来 5 年内罹患 2 型糖尿病的风险为中度(39%)或高度(33%);三分之一(32%)的人患有高血压。在工作中缺乏体育锻炼的原因包括:已经在工作时间以外锻炼(28%)、居住地离工作地点太远(18%)、有时间(9%)和工作时间不灵活(8%)。医护人员的心理困扰问题亟待解决,而了解 COVID-19 对医护人员健康和福祉的纵向影响的必要性也加强了这一点。工作场所(如医疗服务机构)是对医护人员进行投资的理想环境,可为个人、组织和更广泛的社区带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How healthy are the healthcare staff in a rural health service? A cross-sectional study

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the need to understand the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers in hospital settings. Crises like the COVID-19 pandemic create poor health outcomes for healthcare workers, yet little is understood about underlying patterns of modifiable health determinants.

Objective

The aim of the study was to examine the health and wellbeing data of healthcare workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and inform future healthy intervention activities within the workplace.

Design

Repeat cross-sectional study pre-2018 and mid-COVID-19 2020.

Setting(s)

Rural health service in Victoria, Australia.

Participants

All 800 healthcare workers within the health service were invited; of these, 184 (23%) participated at Time 1 and 87 (11%) at Time 2.

Methods

Diet, physical activity, sleep behaviours, and psychological distress were collected via online survey in Qualtrics. Pre-COVID-19 pandemic, anthropometry (height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes risk were collected by a trained practitioner. However, to reduce burden on healthcare workers mid-COVID-19 pandemic, only self-reported anthropometry was collected.

Results

The majority of participants were Australian-born females (84% at both timepoints) with half over the age of 45 (63% Time 1, 53% Time 2). Around half worked part-time (49% Time 1, 54% Time 2), over a third full-time (39% Time 1, 36% Time 2), and the majority reported working regular day shifts in the past 3 months (70% Time 1, 65% Time 2). Among this sample, there were few smokers (9% Time 1, 7% Time 2), and two thirds of participants were living with overweight or obesity (64% Time 1, 67% Time 2). Across both time points, compliance with health guidelines was low; 41% (Time 1) and 42% (Time 2) met fruit, 17% (Time 1) and 12% (Time 2) met vegetable, and just under 50% met physical activity guidelines at both time points. Those reporting moderate to very high levels of psychological stress increased from 42% (Time 1) to 59% (Time 2) (p < 0.05). At Time 1, >80% were at intermediate (39%) or high (33%) risk of developing type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years; and a third (32%) were hypertensive. Reasons for physical inactivity at work included already exercising out-of-work hours (28%), living too far from work (18%), available time (9%), and inflexible work hours (8%).

Conclusions

Several high-risk health areas along with opportunities for supporting improved wellbeing were identified in this group of healthcare workers. Psychological distress of healthcare workers urgently needs to be addressed, and this is reinforced by the need to understand the longitudinal impact of COVID-19 on the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers. Workplace settings, such as a health service, is an ideal setting to invest in healthcare workers with individual, organisational, and broader community benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信