注册助产士和注册助产士的体重偏差:全国抽样调查结果。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Heather M. Bradford CNM, PhD, Rebecca M. Puhl PhD, Julia C. Phillippi CNM, PhD, Mary S. Dietrich PhD, MS, Jeremy L. Neal CNM, PhD
{"title":"注册助产士和注册助产士的体重偏差:全国抽样调查结果。","authors":"Heather M. Bradford CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Puhl PhD,&nbsp;Julia C. Phillippi CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Mary S. Dietrich PhD, MS,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Neal CNM, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights permeates health care settings in the United States and has been associated with poor weight-related communication and quality of care as well as adverse health outcomes. However, there has been limited quantitative investigation into weight bias among perinatal care providers. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)/certified midwives (CMs) attend approximately 11% of all births in the United States. The aims of this study were to measure the direction and extent of weight bias among CNMs/CMs and compare their levels of weight bias to the US public and other health professionals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through direct postcard distribution, social media accounts, professional networks, and email listservs, American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives were solicited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias using the Implicit Association Test and their explicit weight bias using the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire, Fat Phobia Scale, and Preference for Thin People measure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 2257 midwives participated in the survey, yielding a completion rate of 17.7%. Participants were mostly White and female, with a median age of 46 years and 11 years since AMCB certification. More than 70% of midwives have some level of implicit weight bias, although to a lesser extent compared with previously published findings among the US public (<i>P</i> &lt; .01) and other health professionals (<i>P</i> &lt; .01). In a subsample comparison of female midwives to female physicians, implicit weight bias levels were similar (<i>P</i> &gt; .05). Midwives also express explicit weight bias, but at lower levels than the US public and other health professionals (<i>P</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides the first quantitative research documenting weight bias among a national US sample of perinatal care providers. Findings can inform educational efforts to mitigate weight bias in the perinatal care setting and decrease harm.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample\",\"authors\":\"Heather M. Bradford CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Puhl PhD,&nbsp;Julia C. Phillippi CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Mary S. Dietrich PhD, MS,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Neal CNM, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights permeates health care settings in the United States and has been associated with poor weight-related communication and quality of care as well as adverse health outcomes. However, there has been limited quantitative investigation into weight bias among perinatal care providers. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)/certified midwives (CMs) attend approximately 11% of all births in the United States. The aims of this study were to measure the direction and extent of weight bias among CNMs/CMs and compare their levels of weight bias to the US public and other health professionals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through direct postcard distribution, social media accounts, professional networks, and email listservs, American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives were solicited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias using the Implicit Association Test and their explicit weight bias using the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire, Fat Phobia Scale, and Preference for Thin People measure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 2257 midwives participated in the survey, yielding a completion rate of 17.7%. Participants were mostly White and female, with a median age of 46 years and 11 years since AMCB certification. More than 70% of midwives have some level of implicit weight bias, although to a lesser extent compared with previously published findings among the US public (<i>P</i> &lt; .01) and other health professionals (<i>P</i> &lt; .01). In a subsample comparison of female midwives to female physicians, implicit weight bias levels were similar (<i>P</i> &gt; .05). Midwives also express explicit weight bias, but at lower levels than the US public and other health professionals (<i>P</i> &lt; .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study provides the first quantitative research documenting weight bias among a national US sample of perinatal care providers. Findings can inform educational efforts to mitigate weight bias in the perinatal care setting and decrease harm.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13608\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13608\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在美国的医疗机构中,对体重较重的人存在体重偏见,这与体重相关的沟通不畅、医疗质量不高以及不良的健康结果有关。然而,对围产期护理人员体重偏差的定量调查却很有限。在美国,注册助产士(CNMs)/注册助产士(CMs)的接生率约占总接生率的 11%。本研究的目的是测量 CNM/CMs 体重偏差的方向和程度,并将她们的体重偏差水平与美国公众和其他医疗专业人员进行比较:通过直接发放明信片、社交媒体账户、专业网络和电子邮件列表服务,邀请美国助产士认证委员会(AMCB)认证的助产士完成一项在线调查,使用内隐关联测试(Implicit Association Test)了解她们的内隐体重偏见,使用反肥胖态度问卷(Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire)、肥胖恐惧症量表(Fat Phobia Scale)和瘦人偏好量表(Preference for Thin People measure)了解她们的外显体重偏见:共有 2257 名助产士参与了调查,完成率为 17.7%。参与者大多为白人和女性,年龄中位数为 46 岁,获得 AMCB 证书的时间为 11 年。超过 70% 的助产士存在一定程度的隐性体重偏差,但与之前公布的美国公众调查结果相比,程度较轻(P .05)。助产士也表达了明确的体重偏见,但其程度低于美国公众和其他医疗专业人员(P 讨论):本研究首次对美国全国围产期保健提供者的体重偏差进行了定量研究。研究结果可为减轻围产期保健中的体重偏见和减少伤害的教育工作提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample

Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample

Introduction

Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights permeates health care settings in the United States and has been associated with poor weight-related communication and quality of care as well as adverse health outcomes. However, there has been limited quantitative investigation into weight bias among perinatal care providers. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)/certified midwives (CMs) attend approximately 11% of all births in the United States. The aims of this study were to measure the direction and extent of weight bias among CNMs/CMs and compare their levels of weight bias to the US public and other health professionals.

Methods

Through direct postcard distribution, social media accounts, professional networks, and email listservs, American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives were solicited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias using the Implicit Association Test and their explicit weight bias using the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire, Fat Phobia Scale, and Preference for Thin People measure.

Results

A total of 2257 midwives participated in the survey, yielding a completion rate of 17.7%. Participants were mostly White and female, with a median age of 46 years and 11 years since AMCB certification. More than 70% of midwives have some level of implicit weight bias, although to a lesser extent compared with previously published findings among the US public (P < .01) and other health professionals (P < .01). In a subsample comparison of female midwives to female physicians, implicit weight bias levels were similar (P > .05). Midwives also express explicit weight bias, but at lower levels than the US public and other health professionals (P < .05).

Discussion

This study provides the first quantitative research documenting weight bias among a national US sample of perinatal care providers. Findings can inform educational efforts to mitigate weight bias in the perinatal care setting and decrease harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信