E. Barge-Caballero , J. Sieira-Hermida , G. Barge-Caballero , D. Couto-Mallón , M.J. Paniagua-Martín , D. Enríquez-Vázquez , P.J. Marcos-Rodríguez , J. Rodríguez-Capitán , J.M. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M.G. Crespo-Leiro
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病和支气管哮喘对心力衰竭患者预后的影响","authors":"E. Barge-Caballero , J. Sieira-Hermida , G. Barge-Caballero , D. Couto-Mallón , M.J. Paniagua-Martín , D. Enríquez-Vázquez , P.J. Marcos-Rodríguez , J. Rodríguez-Capitán , J.M. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M.G. Crespo-Leiro","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyze the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma on therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analysis of the information collected in a clinical registry of patients referred to a specialized HF unit from January-2010 to June-2012. Clinical profile, treatment and prognosis of patients was evaluated, according to the presence of COPD or asthma. Survival analyses were conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier and Cox's methods. Median follow-up was 1493 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 2577 patients, of which 251 (9.7%) presented COPD and 96 (3.7%) bronchial asthma. Significant differences among study groups were observed regarding to the prescription of beta-blockers (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->89.6%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%; no bronchopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94.1%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002) and SGLT2 inhibitors (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->35.1%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50%; no bronchopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->38.3%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.036). Also, patients with bronchial disease received less frequently a defibrillator (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->20.3%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->20.8%; no broncopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->29%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.004).</p><p>COPD was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.64; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.33-2.02), all-cause death or HF admission (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.47; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.22-1.76) and cardiovascular death or heart transplantation (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.39; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.08-1.79) as compared with patients with no bronchopathy. Bronchial asthma was not significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>COPD, but not asthma, is an adverse independent prognostic factor in patients with HF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"224 3","pages":"Pages 123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacto pronóstico de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y el asma bronquial en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca\",\"authors\":\"E. Barge-Caballero , J. Sieira-Hermida , G. Barge-Caballero , D. Couto-Mallón , M.J. Paniagua-Martín , D. Enríquez-Vázquez , P.J. Marcos-Rodríguez , J. Rodríguez-Capitán , J.M. Vázquez-Rodríguez , M.G. Crespo-Leiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To analyze the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma on therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analysis of the information collected in a clinical registry of patients referred to a specialized HF unit from January-2010 to June-2012. Clinical profile, treatment and prognosis of patients was evaluated, according to the presence of COPD or asthma. Survival analyses were conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier and Cox's methods. Median follow-up was 1493 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 2577 patients, of which 251 (9.7%) presented COPD and 96 (3.7%) bronchial asthma. Significant differences among study groups were observed regarding to the prescription of beta-blockers (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->89.6%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%; no bronchopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94.1%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002) and SGLT2 inhibitors (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->35.1%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50%; no bronchopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->38.3%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.036). Also, patients with bronchial disease received less frequently a defibrillator (COPD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->20.3%; asthma<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->20.8%; no broncopathy<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->29%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.004).</p><p>COPD was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.64; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.33-2.02), all-cause death or HF admission (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.47; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.22-1.76) and cardiovascular death or heart transplantation (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.39; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 1.08-1.79) as compared with patients with no bronchopathy. Bronchial asthma was not significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>COPD, but not asthma, is an adverse independent prognostic factor in patients with HF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"volume\":\"224 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacto pronóstico de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y el asma bronquial en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca
Purpose
To analyze the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma on therapeutic management and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF).
Methods
Analysis of the information collected in a clinical registry of patients referred to a specialized HF unit from January-2010 to June-2012. Clinical profile, treatment and prognosis of patients was evaluated, according to the presence of COPD or asthma. Survival analyses were conducted by means of Kaplan-Meier and Cox's methods. Median follow-up was 1493 days.
Results
We studied 2577 patients, of which 251 (9.7%) presented COPD and 96 (3.7%) bronchial asthma. Significant differences among study groups were observed regarding to the prescription of beta-blockers (COPD = 89.6%; asthma = 87.5%; no bronchopathy = 94.1%; P = .002) and SGLT2 inhibitors (COPD = 35.1%; asthma = 50%; no bronchopathy = 38.3%; P = .036). Also, patients with bronchial disease received less frequently a defibrillator (COPD = 20.3%; asthma = 20.8%; no broncopathy = 29%; P = .004).
COPD was independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.33-2.02), all-cause death or HF admission (HR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22-1.76) and cardiovascular death or heart transplantation (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.08-1.79) as compared with patients with no bronchopathy. Bronchial asthma was not significantly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.
Conclusions
COPD, but not asthma, is an adverse independent prognostic factor in patients with HF.
期刊介绍:
Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI).
The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.