维里坦氏族链球菌菌血症的临床和微生物学概况;南印度的经验。

Le infezioni in medicina Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.53854/liim-3201-5
Rajalakshmi Arjun, Vettakkara Kandy Muhammed Niyas, Febeena Hussain, Sandeep Surendran, Viji Mohan
{"title":"维里坦氏族链球菌菌血症的临床和微生物学概况;南印度的经验。","authors":"Rajalakshmi Arjun, Vettakkara Kandy Muhammed Niyas, Febeena Hussain, Sandeep Surendran, Viji Mohan","doi":"10.53854/liim-3201-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Viridans Group Streptococci (VGS) are a group of distinct species that can cause bacteraemia and other invasive infections. They are also among the common organisms causing infective endocarditis. Data on the epidemiology and clinical profile of VGS is limited, especially from India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an electronic medical record-based retrospective analysis of patients with VGS bacteraemia admitted to our hospital between January 2012 to December 2021. Blood cultures were incubated by BacT/ALERT system and bacterial identification and susceptibility testing were done by using the VITEK 2 microbial identification system. Susceptibility test reporting was as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The incidence, clinical profile, source of bacteraemia, co-morbidities and antimicrobial resistance among VGS bacteraemia were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VGS were isolated in 219 patients, accounting for 3.2% of positive blood cultures during the period studied. The median age of the patients was 58 years and 69% were males. Diabetes mellitus was the most common co-morbidity (55%) followed by chronic kidney disease and chronic liver disease. Patients with haematological malignancy and neutropenia were few. Intra-abdominal infections were the most common source of infection and was noted in 26%. Infective endocarditis was diagnosed in only 10% of the cases. <i>Streptococcus mitis</i> was the most common species isolated followed by <i>S. gallolyticus</i> and <i>S. sanguinis</i>. 9.58% of the isolates could not be identified up to the species level. Overall penicillin susceptibility was 71% and ceftriaxone susceptibility was 92%, with individual species variation. In-hospital mortality was 19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VGS are an important cause of bacteraemia and was associated with 19% mortality in our study. High rates of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance are a reason of concern. Molecular diagnostics like matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identification must be increasingly applied for species identification considering that a substantial number of isolates were not identified to species level.</p>","PeriodicalId":502111,"journal":{"name":"Le infezioni in medicina","volume":"32 1","pages":"37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and microbiological profile of Viridans group streptococcal bacteraemia; experience from South India.\",\"authors\":\"Rajalakshmi Arjun, Vettakkara Kandy Muhammed Niyas, Febeena Hussain, Sandeep Surendran, Viji Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.53854/liim-3201-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Viridans Group Streptococci (VGS) are a group of distinct species that can cause bacteraemia and other invasive infections. They are also among the common organisms causing infective endocarditis. Data on the epidemiology and clinical profile of VGS is limited, especially from India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an electronic medical record-based retrospective analysis of patients with VGS bacteraemia admitted to our hospital between January 2012 to December 2021. Blood cultures were incubated by BacT/ALERT system and bacterial identification and susceptibility testing were done by using the VITEK 2 microbial identification system. Susceptibility test reporting was as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The incidence, clinical profile, source of bacteraemia, co-morbidities and antimicrobial resistance among VGS bacteraemia were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VGS were isolated in 219 patients, accounting for 3.2% of positive blood cultures during the period studied. The median age of the patients was 58 years and 69% were males. Diabetes mellitus was the most common co-morbidity (55%) followed by chronic kidney disease and chronic liver disease. Patients with haematological malignancy and neutropenia were few. Intra-abdominal infections were the most common source of infection and was noted in 26%. Infective endocarditis was diagnosed in only 10% of the cases. <i>Streptococcus mitis</i> was the most common species isolated followed by <i>S. gallolyticus</i> and <i>S. sanguinis</i>. 9.58% of the isolates could not be identified up to the species level. Overall penicillin susceptibility was 71% and ceftriaxone susceptibility was 92%, with individual species variation. In-hospital mortality was 19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VGS are an important cause of bacteraemia and was associated with 19% mortality in our study. High rates of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance are a reason of concern. Molecular diagnostics like matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identification must be increasingly applied for species identification considering that a substantial number of isolates were not identified to species level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":502111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Le infezioni in medicina\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"37-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Le infezioni in medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3201-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Le infezioni in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3201-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:病毒性链球菌(VGS)是一组可引起菌血症和其他侵袭性感染的独特菌种。它们也是引起感染性心内膜炎的常见微生物之一。有关 VGS 流行病学和临床概况的数据非常有限,尤其是来自印度的数据:我们对本院 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间收治的 VGS 菌血症患者进行了基于电子病历的回顾性分析。血液培养物由 BacT/ALERT 系统培养,细菌鉴定和药敏试验由 VITEK 2 微生物鉴定系统完成。药敏试验报告按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指南进行。对 VGS 菌血症的发病率、临床特征、菌血症来源、并发症和抗菌药耐药性进行了分析:结果:219 名患者分离出了 VGS,占研究期间血培养阳性病例的 3.2%。患者的中位年龄为 58 岁,69% 为男性。糖尿病是最常见的并发症(55%),其次是慢性肾病和慢性肝病。血液恶性肿瘤和中性粒细胞减少症患者很少。腹腔内感染是最常见的感染源,占 26%。只有10%的病例被诊断为感染性心内膜炎。肝炎链球菌是最常见的分离菌种,其次是胆溶血性链球菌和脑膜炎链球菌。9.58%的分离株无法确定其种类。对青霉素的总体敏感性为 71%,对头孢曲松的敏感性为 92%,但存在个体差异。院内死亡率为 19%:在我们的研究中,VGS 是导致菌血症的一个重要原因,并与 19% 的死亡率有关。青霉素和头孢曲松的高耐药性令人担忧。考虑到大量分离菌株未被鉴定为菌种,必须越来越多地采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)鉴定等分子诊断方法进行菌种鉴定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and microbiological profile of Viridans group streptococcal bacteraemia; experience from South India.

Background: Viridans Group Streptococci (VGS) are a group of distinct species that can cause bacteraemia and other invasive infections. They are also among the common organisms causing infective endocarditis. Data on the epidemiology and clinical profile of VGS is limited, especially from India.

Methods: We conducted an electronic medical record-based retrospective analysis of patients with VGS bacteraemia admitted to our hospital between January 2012 to December 2021. Blood cultures were incubated by BacT/ALERT system and bacterial identification and susceptibility testing were done by using the VITEK 2 microbial identification system. Susceptibility test reporting was as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The incidence, clinical profile, source of bacteraemia, co-morbidities and antimicrobial resistance among VGS bacteraemia were analyzed.

Results: VGS were isolated in 219 patients, accounting for 3.2% of positive blood cultures during the period studied. The median age of the patients was 58 years and 69% were males. Diabetes mellitus was the most common co-morbidity (55%) followed by chronic kidney disease and chronic liver disease. Patients with haematological malignancy and neutropenia were few. Intra-abdominal infections were the most common source of infection and was noted in 26%. Infective endocarditis was diagnosed in only 10% of the cases. Streptococcus mitis was the most common species isolated followed by S. gallolyticus and S. sanguinis. 9.58% of the isolates could not be identified up to the species level. Overall penicillin susceptibility was 71% and ceftriaxone susceptibility was 92%, with individual species variation. In-hospital mortality was 19%.

Conclusions: VGS are an important cause of bacteraemia and was associated with 19% mortality in our study. High rates of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance are a reason of concern. Molecular diagnostics like matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identification must be increasingly applied for species identification considering that a substantial number of isolates were not identified to species level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信