老年患者多层次退行性颈椎病手术治疗后的短期疗效比较:2010-2020年国家手术质量改进计划数据库分析》。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0276
Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu Choi, Paramveer Singh Birring, Joshua Lee, Sohaib Zafar Hashmi, Nitin Narain Bhatia, Yu-Po Lee
{"title":"老年患者多层次退行性颈椎病手术治疗后的短期疗效比较:2010-2020年国家手术质量改进计划数据库分析》。","authors":"Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu Choi, Paramveer Singh Birring, Joshua Lee, Sohaib Zafar Hashmi, Nitin Narain Bhatia, Yu-Po Lee","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Hyun-Kyu Choi, Paramveer Singh Birring, Joshua Lee, Sohaib Zafar Hashmi, Nitin Narain Bhatia, Yu-Po Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2023.0276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"190-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:目的:比较颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)、颈椎后路椎板成形术(LP)和颈椎后路椎板切除融合术(PCF)在老年人群中的短期并发症发生率:美国的老年人口大幅增加。退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是由颈椎椎管狭窄引起的,其发病率随着年龄的增长而增加。因此,需要手术干预的多级 DCM 的发病率可能会增加。ACDF、LP 和 PCF 是治疗多水平 DCM 最常用的手术技术。然而,老年 DCM 的最佳减压手术技术尚不确定:分析了接受多水平 ACDF、LP 或 PCF 治疗 DCM 的 65 岁患者。此外,还根据美国麻醉医师协会的分类评分和术前功能状态对数据进行了标准化分析:结果:共确认了 23 129 例患者。与其他两组患者相比,接受 ACDF 的患者更年轻、更多为女性、术前更健康。估计的术后死亡率和发病率、平均手术时间和住院时间,ACDF最低,LP次之,PCF最高。ACDF和LP的再入院率和再手术率相当,但都明显低于PCF:结论:PCF 与 65 岁患者术后短期内最高的死亡率、发病率、非计划再手术和非计划再入院风险相关。相比之下,ACDF 的风险最低。然而,某些疾病的特殊因素可能需要后路治疗。对于这些病例,在确定老年患者的理想手术方式时,应将 LP 纳入术前讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy in the Geriatric Patient Population: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 2010-2020.

Study design: Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2020.

Purpose: To compare the short-term complication rates of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical laminoplasty (LP), and posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCF) in a geriatric population.

Overview of literature: The geriatric population in the United States has increased significantly. Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is caused by cervical spinal stenosis, and its prevalence increases with age. Therefore, the incidence of multilevel DCM requiring surgical intervention is likely to increase. ACDF, LP, and PCF are the most commonly used surgical techniques for treating multilevel DCM. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical technique for the decompression of DCM in geriatric patients.

Methods: Patients aged 65 years who had undergone either multilevel ACDF, LP, or PCF for the treatment of DCM were analyzed. Additional analysis was performed by standardizing the data for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification scores and preoperative functional status.

Results: A total of 23,129 patients were identified. Patients with ACDF were younger, more often female, and preoperatively healthier than those in the other two groups. The estimated postoperative mortality and morbidity, mean operation time, and length of hospital stay were the lowest for ACDF, second lowest for LP, and highest for PCF. The readmission and reoperation rates were comparable between ACDF and LP; however, both were significantly lower than PCF.

Conclusions: PCF is associated with the highest risk of mortality, morbidity, unplanned reoperation, and unplanned readmission in the short-term postoperative period in patients aged 65 years. In contrast, ACDF carries the lowest risk. However, some disease-specific factors may require posterior treatment. For these cases, LP should be included in the preoperative discussion when determining the ideal surgical approach for geriatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信