COVID-19 期间的共育质量:使用混合方法探索性别差异

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Sabrina Douglas, Katherine Morrison, Alison Miller, Jess Haines
{"title":"COVID-19 期间的共育质量:使用混合方法探索性别差异","authors":"Sabrina Douglas, Katherine Morrison, Alison Miller, Jess Haines","doi":"10.1177/0192513x241236555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to examine potential differences in coparenting quality during the COVID-19 pandemic among mothers and fathers using an embedded mixed methods approach. The objectives were to compare mothers’ and fathers’ scores on the Coparenting Relationship Scale among 150 mother–father dyads, and to examine mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of how COVID-19 influenced their coparenting quality using thematic analysis of 159 mothers’ and 75 fathers’ responses to an open-ended coparenting survey question. While total coparenting quality scores did not differ among mothers and fathers, fathers had significantly higher scores on the division of labour and endorsement subscales, and mothers had significantly higher scores on the undermining subscale. The qualitative thematic analysis identified five key themes: gendered changes to division of labour, increased hostility, increased teamwork, less alone time, and increased stress. Efforts to mitigate adverse pandemic outcomes on families should address coparenting quality.","PeriodicalId":48283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coparenting Quality During COVID-19: Exploring Gender Differences Using a Mixed Methods Approach\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Douglas, Katherine Morrison, Alison Miller, Jess Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0192513x241236555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to examine potential differences in coparenting quality during the COVID-19 pandemic among mothers and fathers using an embedded mixed methods approach. The objectives were to compare mothers’ and fathers’ scores on the Coparenting Relationship Scale among 150 mother–father dyads, and to examine mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of how COVID-19 influenced their coparenting quality using thematic analysis of 159 mothers’ and 75 fathers’ responses to an open-ended coparenting survey question. While total coparenting quality scores did not differ among mothers and fathers, fathers had significantly higher scores on the division of labour and endorsement subscales, and mothers had significantly higher scores on the undermining subscale. The qualitative thematic analysis identified five key themes: gendered changes to division of labour, increased hostility, increased teamwork, less alone time, and increased stress. Efforts to mitigate adverse pandemic outcomes on families should address coparenting quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x241236555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x241236555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是采用嵌入式混合方法,研究在 COVID-19 大流行期间,母亲和父亲在共同养育子女质量方面的潜在差异。研究目的是比较 150 个母亲-父亲二人组中母亲和父亲在 "亲子关系量表 "上的得分,并通过对 159 位母亲和 75 位父亲对开放式亲子关系调查问题的回答进行主题分析,研究母亲和父亲对 COVID-19 如何影响其亲子关系质量的看法。虽然母亲和父亲的共同养育质量总分没有差异,但父亲在劳动分工和认可分量表上的得分明显更高,而母亲在破坏分量表上的得分明显更高。定性主题分析确定了五个关键主题:分工的性别变化、敌意增加、团队合作增加、独处时间减少和压力增加。为减轻大流行病对家庭造成的不利影响而做出的努力应解决共同养育的质量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coparenting Quality During COVID-19: Exploring Gender Differences Using a Mixed Methods Approach
The aim of this study was to examine potential differences in coparenting quality during the COVID-19 pandemic among mothers and fathers using an embedded mixed methods approach. The objectives were to compare mothers’ and fathers’ scores on the Coparenting Relationship Scale among 150 mother–father dyads, and to examine mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of how COVID-19 influenced their coparenting quality using thematic analysis of 159 mothers’ and 75 fathers’ responses to an open-ended coparenting survey question. While total coparenting quality scores did not differ among mothers and fathers, fathers had significantly higher scores on the division of labour and endorsement subscales, and mothers had significantly higher scores on the undermining subscale. The qualitative thematic analysis identified five key themes: gendered changes to division of labour, increased hostility, increased teamwork, less alone time, and increased stress. Efforts to mitigate adverse pandemic outcomes on families should address coparenting quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Issues
Journal of Family Issues FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to contemporary social issues and social problems related to marriage and family life and to theoretical and professional issues of current interest to those who work with and study families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信