IV 期 PROVE 研究:佩兰帕奈在儿科癫痫患者实际临床护理中的应用

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine Moretz , James Wheless , Cesar Santos , Eric Segal , Marcelo Lancman , Anna Patten , Manoj Malhotra
{"title":"IV 期 PROVE 研究:佩兰帕奈在儿科癫痫患者实际临床护理中的应用","authors":"Katherine Moretz ,&nbsp;James Wheless ,&nbsp;Cesar Santos ,&nbsp;Eric Segal ,&nbsp;Marcelo Lancman ,&nbsp;Anna Patten ,&nbsp;Manoj Malhotra","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged &lt;4 years and 4–&lt;12 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (&lt;4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4–&lt;12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1–3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [&lt;4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4–&lt;12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [&lt;4 years] versus 52.4% [4–&lt;12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (&lt;4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4–&lt;12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perampanel was generally well tolerated with &lt;21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and &gt;35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50481,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase IV PROVE study: Perampanel in real-world clinical care of pediatric patients with epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Moretz ,&nbsp;James Wheless ,&nbsp;Cesar Santos ,&nbsp;Eric Segal ,&nbsp;Marcelo Lancman ,&nbsp;Anna Patten ,&nbsp;Manoj Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged &lt;4 years and 4–&lt;12 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (&lt;4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4–&lt;12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1–3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [&lt;4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4–&lt;12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [&lt;4 years] versus 52.4% [4–&lt;12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (&lt;4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4–&lt;12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perampanel was generally well tolerated with &lt;21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and &gt;35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Paediatric Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090379824000151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非干预性IV期PROVE研究(NCT03208660)评估了癫痫患者在常规临床治疗期间的保留率、疗效、安全性和耐受性以及perampanel剂量。该分析评估了患者的最终数据(年龄分别为 35% 的患者在 12 个月和 24 个月时),以及常规临床护理期间儿科患者的持续疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase IV PROVE study: Perampanel in real-world clinical care of pediatric patients with epilepsy

Introduction

The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged <4 years and 4–<12 years.

Methods

Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability.

Results

The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (<4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4–<12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1–3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [<4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4–<12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [<4 years] versus 52.4% [4–<12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (<4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4–<12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]).

Conclusions

Perampanel was generally well tolerated with <21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and >35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Paediatric Neurology is the Official Journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, successor to the long-established European Federation of Child Neurology Societies. Under the guidance of a prestigious International editorial board, this multi-disciplinary journal publishes exciting clinical and experimental research in this rapidly expanding field. High quality papers written by leading experts encompass all the major diseases including epilepsy, movement disorders, neuromuscular disorders, neurodegenerative disorders and intellectual disability. Other exciting highlights include articles on brain imaging and neonatal neurology, and the publication of regularly updated tables relating to the main groups of disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信