Austin Adams, Ciamac Moallemi, Sara Reynolds, Dan Robinson
{"title":"am-AMM: 拍卖管理型自动做市商","authors":"Austin Adams, Ciamac Moallemi, Sara Reynolds, Dan Robinson","doi":"arxiv-2403.03367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated market makers (AMMs) have emerged as the dominant market mechanism\nfor trading on decentralized exchanges implemented on blockchains. This paper\npresents a single mechanism that targets two important unsolved problems for\nAMMs: reducing losses to informed orderflow, and maximizing revenue from\nuninformed orderflow. The \"auction-managed AMM\" works by running a\ncensorship-resistant onchain auction for the right to temporarily act as \"pool\nmanager\" for a constant-product AMM. The pool manager sets the swap fee rate on\nthe pool, and also receives the accrued fees from swaps. The pool manager can\nexclusively capture some arbitrage by trading against the pool in response to\nsmall price movements, and also can set swap fees incorporating price\nsensitivity of retail orderflow and adapting to changing market conditions,\nwith the benefits from both ultimately accruing to liquidity providers.\nLiquidity providers can enter and exit the pool freely in response to changing\nrent, though they must pay a small fee on withdrawal. We prove that under\ncertain assumptions, this AMM should have higher liquidity in equilibrium than\nany standard, fixed-fee AMM.","PeriodicalId":501084,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"am-AMM: An Auction-Managed Automated Market Maker\",\"authors\":\"Austin Adams, Ciamac Moallemi, Sara Reynolds, Dan Robinson\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2403.03367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated market makers (AMMs) have emerged as the dominant market mechanism\\nfor trading on decentralized exchanges implemented on blockchains. This paper\\npresents a single mechanism that targets two important unsolved problems for\\nAMMs: reducing losses to informed orderflow, and maximizing revenue from\\nuninformed orderflow. The \\\"auction-managed AMM\\\" works by running a\\ncensorship-resistant onchain auction for the right to temporarily act as \\\"pool\\nmanager\\\" for a constant-product AMM. The pool manager sets the swap fee rate on\\nthe pool, and also receives the accrued fees from swaps. The pool manager can\\nexclusively capture some arbitrage by trading against the pool in response to\\nsmall price movements, and also can set swap fees incorporating price\\nsensitivity of retail orderflow and adapting to changing market conditions,\\nwith the benefits from both ultimately accruing to liquidity providers.\\nLiquidity providers can enter and exit the pool freely in response to changing\\nrent, though they must pay a small fee on withdrawal. We prove that under\\ncertain assumptions, this AMM should have higher liquidity in equilibrium than\\nany standard, fixed-fee AMM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.03367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Mathematical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.03367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated market makers (AMMs) have emerged as the dominant market mechanism
for trading on decentralized exchanges implemented on blockchains. This paper
presents a single mechanism that targets two important unsolved problems for
AMMs: reducing losses to informed orderflow, and maximizing revenue from
uninformed orderflow. The "auction-managed AMM" works by running a
censorship-resistant onchain auction for the right to temporarily act as "pool
manager" for a constant-product AMM. The pool manager sets the swap fee rate on
the pool, and also receives the accrued fees from swaps. The pool manager can
exclusively capture some arbitrage by trading against the pool in response to
small price movements, and also can set swap fees incorporating price
sensitivity of retail orderflow and adapting to changing market conditions,
with the benefits from both ultimately accruing to liquidity providers.
Liquidity providers can enter and exit the pool freely in response to changing
rent, though they must pay a small fee on withdrawal. We prove that under
certain assumptions, this AMM should have higher liquidity in equilibrium than
any standard, fixed-fee AMM.