教育质量至关重要时的学费和学券

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Alessandro Balestrino, Lisa Grazzini, Annalisa Luporini
{"title":"教育质量至关重要时的学费和学券","authors":"Alessandro Balestrino, Lisa Grazzini, Annalisa Luporini","doi":"10.1515/ger-2023-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to analyse the role that quantity and quality of education may play in the design of public policies. In our model, educated people enjoy a premium on their incomes, and education generates a positive externality for the society. Households live in two areas with different socio-economic characteristics. Altruistic parents choose both the amount and the quality of schooling they want for their children, ignoring the external effect. The latter is, instead, taken into account by the government, which is assumed to provide a composite education service that has a quantity as well as a quality dimension, and is financed mainly via taxes on the income of the parents. We investigate the effects on welfare of balanced-budget policy reforms aimed at introducing or raising i) school fees, and ii) vouchers meant to compensate the costs of attending high-quality schools. We show that, if the external effects are not considered, school fees improve <jats:italic>private</jats:italic> parental welfare while vouchers do not. Parental altruism is not enough to support high levels of quantity and quality of education. The consideration of <jats:italic>social</jats:italic> welfare, i.e. inclusive of the impact of the externality, somewhat mitigates the above results, by favouring lower (albeit positive) fees and allowing vouchers to increase social welfare under some circumstances.","PeriodicalId":46476,"journal":{"name":"German Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Fees and Vouchers when Quality of Education Matters\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Balestrino, Lisa Grazzini, Annalisa Luporini\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ger-2023-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to analyse the role that quantity and quality of education may play in the design of public policies. In our model, educated people enjoy a premium on their incomes, and education generates a positive externality for the society. Households live in two areas with different socio-economic characteristics. Altruistic parents choose both the amount and the quality of schooling they want for their children, ignoring the external effect. The latter is, instead, taken into account by the government, which is assumed to provide a composite education service that has a quantity as well as a quality dimension, and is financed mainly via taxes on the income of the parents. We investigate the effects on welfare of balanced-budget policy reforms aimed at introducing or raising i) school fees, and ii) vouchers meant to compensate the costs of attending high-quality schools. We show that, if the external effects are not considered, school fees improve <jats:italic>private</jats:italic> parental welfare while vouchers do not. Parental altruism is not enough to support high levels of quantity and quality of education. The consideration of <jats:italic>social</jats:italic> welfare, i.e. inclusive of the impact of the externality, somewhat mitigates the above results, by favouring lower (albeit positive) fees and allowing vouchers to increase social welfare under some circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2023-0058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2023-0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析教育的数量和质量在公共政策设计中可能发挥的作用。在我们的模型中,受过教育的人享有收入溢价,教育对社会产生积极的外部效应。家庭生活在两个具有不同社会经济特征的地区。利他主义的父母会为子女选择学校教育的数量和质量,而忽略外部效应。后者则由政府考虑,假定政府提供的综合教育服务既有数量方面的,也有质量方面的,其资金来源主要是对父母的收入征税。我们研究了平衡预算政策改革对福利的影响,这些改革旨在引入或提高 i) 学费,以及 ii) 用于补偿就读优质学校成本的代金券。我们的研究表明,如果不考虑外部效应,学费会改善家长的私人福利,而代金券则不会。家长的利他主义不足以支持高水平的教育数量和质量。对社会福利的考虑,即包括外部效应的影响,在一定程度上缓解了上述结果,有利于降低学费(尽管是正数),并允许学券在某些情况下增加社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School Fees and Vouchers when Quality of Education Matters
The aim of this paper is to analyse the role that quantity and quality of education may play in the design of public policies. In our model, educated people enjoy a premium on their incomes, and education generates a positive externality for the society. Households live in two areas with different socio-economic characteristics. Altruistic parents choose both the amount and the quality of schooling they want for their children, ignoring the external effect. The latter is, instead, taken into account by the government, which is assumed to provide a composite education service that has a quantity as well as a quality dimension, and is financed mainly via taxes on the income of the parents. We investigate the effects on welfare of balanced-budget policy reforms aimed at introducing or raising i) school fees, and ii) vouchers meant to compensate the costs of attending high-quality schools. We show that, if the external effects are not considered, school fees improve private parental welfare while vouchers do not. Parental altruism is not enough to support high levels of quantity and quality of education. The consideration of social welfare, i.e. inclusive of the impact of the externality, somewhat mitigates the above results, by favouring lower (albeit positive) fees and allowing vouchers to increase social welfare under some circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: German Economic Review, the official publication of the German Economic Association (Verein für Socialpolitik), is an international journal publishing original and rigorous research of general interest in a broad range of economic disciplines, including: - macro- and microeconomics - economic policy - international economics - public economics - finance - business administration The scope of research approaches includes theoretical, empirical and experimental work. Innovative and thought-provoking contributions, in particular from younger authors, are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信