贝类水产养殖场作为近岸鱼类和蟹类的觅食栖息地

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Karl B. Veggerby, Mark D. Scheuerell, Beth L. Sanderson, Peter M. Kiffney, Bridget E. Ferriss
{"title":"贝类水产养殖场作为近岸鱼类和蟹类的觅食栖息地","authors":"Karl B. Veggerby,&nbsp;Mark D. Scheuerell,&nbsp;Beth L. Sanderson,&nbsp;Peter M. Kiffney,&nbsp;Bridget E. Ferriss","doi":"10.1002/mcf2.10282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Oyster reefs across North America have declined precipitously over the past 140 years. In Washington State, Olympia oyster <i>Ostrea lurida</i> reefs historically provided water filtration and nearshore structural habitat for fishes and invertebrates, but this species is now functionally extinct across its historical range. In place of these naturally occurring reefs, shellfish farms consisting mainly of nonnative Pacific oysters <i>Magallana gigas</i> now occupy patches of nearshore habitat across Washington. These farms modify intertidal substrate by adding structural habitat via suspended oyster grow bags, predator exclusion nets, loose oyster beds, and other shellfish grow-out gear. As interest and investment in shellfish aquaculture have expanded both locally and globally, so has interest in how these farms modify intertidal habitat and whether the complex structure created by the shellfish and shellfish growing gear provides ecosystem services that are comparable to those of unfarmed areas, such as mudflats and eelgrass meadows.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we sought to quantify how shellfish farms are used as foraging habitat for several common nearshore species of fish and crabs in Puget Sound, Washington. We used direct observations of species-specific behaviors from underwater video to model how habitat type affected observed foraging rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>We obtained a total of 393 crab observations, 431 demersal fish observations, and 1856 pelagic fish observations across all seven farm sites. Several common species of pelagic fish (e.g., surfperch [Embiotocidae]) used aquaculture-growing gear more frequently than unfarmed areas as foraging habitat, but <i>Metacarcinus</i> spp. crabs displayed higher foraging frequency in unfarmed mudflats. Species groups such as sculpins (Cottidae) and small flatfish (Pleuronectidae) clearly used specific aquaculture-growing gear and mudflats in roughly equal proportion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicate that shellfish farms within a larger nearshore habitat mosaic of eelgrass meadows, mudflats, bivalve aquaculture gear, and edge habitat can provide foraging habitat for several species of nearshore fish.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51257,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcf2.10282","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shellfish aquaculture farms as foraging habitat for nearshore fishes and crabs\",\"authors\":\"Karl B. Veggerby,&nbsp;Mark D. Scheuerell,&nbsp;Beth L. Sanderson,&nbsp;Peter M. Kiffney,&nbsp;Bridget E. Ferriss\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcf2.10282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oyster reefs across North America have declined precipitously over the past 140 years. In Washington State, Olympia oyster <i>Ostrea lurida</i> reefs historically provided water filtration and nearshore structural habitat for fishes and invertebrates, but this species is now functionally extinct across its historical range. In place of these naturally occurring reefs, shellfish farms consisting mainly of nonnative Pacific oysters <i>Magallana gigas</i> now occupy patches of nearshore habitat across Washington. These farms modify intertidal substrate by adding structural habitat via suspended oyster grow bags, predator exclusion nets, loose oyster beds, and other shellfish grow-out gear. As interest and investment in shellfish aquaculture have expanded both locally and globally, so has interest in how these farms modify intertidal habitat and whether the complex structure created by the shellfish and shellfish growing gear provides ecosystem services that are comparable to those of unfarmed areas, such as mudflats and eelgrass meadows.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, we sought to quantify how shellfish farms are used as foraging habitat for several common nearshore species of fish and crabs in Puget Sound, Washington. We used direct observations of species-specific behaviors from underwater video to model how habitat type affected observed foraging rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>We obtained a total of 393 crab observations, 431 demersal fish observations, and 1856 pelagic fish observations across all seven farm sites. Several common species of pelagic fish (e.g., surfperch [Embiotocidae]) used aquaculture-growing gear more frequently than unfarmed areas as foraging habitat, but <i>Metacarcinus</i> spp. crabs displayed higher foraging frequency in unfarmed mudflats. Species groups such as sculpins (Cottidae) and small flatfish (Pleuronectidae) clearly used specific aquaculture-growing gear and mudflats in roughly equal proportion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results indicate that shellfish farms within a larger nearshore habitat mosaic of eelgrass meadows, mudflats, bivalve aquaculture gear, and edge habitat can provide foraging habitat for several species of nearshore fish.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Coastal Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mcf2.10282\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Coastal Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcf2.10282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Coastal Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcf2.10282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 北美各地的牡蛎礁在过去 140 年中急剧减少。在华盛顿州,奥林匹亚牡蛎(Ostrea lurida)礁在历史上曾为鱼类和无脊椎动物提供水过滤和近岸结构栖息地,但现在该物种已在其历史范围内灭绝。现在,主要由非本地太平洋牡蛎(Magallana gigas)组成的贝类养殖场取代了这些自然形成的礁石,占据了整个华盛顿州的近岸栖息地。这些养殖场通过悬挂牡蛎生长袋、捕食者排除网、松散牡蛎床和其他贝类生长工具增加结构性生境,从而改变潮间带底质。随着当地和全球对贝类养殖的兴趣和投资不断扩大,人们对这些养殖场如何改变潮间带生境以及贝类和贝类养殖工具所形成的复杂结构是否能提供与泥滩和鳗草草甸等非养殖区相当的生态系统服务也产生了兴趣。 方法 在这项研究中,我们试图量化贝类养殖场如何被华盛顿州普吉特湾的几种常见近岸鱼类和蟹类用作觅食栖息地。我们利用水下视频对物种特定行为的直接观察来模拟栖息地类型如何影响观察到的觅食率。 结果 我们在所有七个养殖场共观察到 393 只螃蟹、431 条底层鱼类和 1856 条中上层鱼类。几种常见的中上层鱼类(如胭脂鱼[Embiotocidae])使用水产养殖生长网箱作为觅食栖息地的频率高于未养殖区域,但Metacarcinus属螃蟹在未养殖泥滩的觅食频率较高。鳞栉水母(Cottidae)和小型比目鱼(Pleuronectidae)等物种群明显以大致相同的比例使用特定的水产养殖渔具和泥滩。 结论 我们的研究结果表明,在由鳗草草甸、泥滩、双壳类水产养殖渔具和边缘生境组成的更大近岸生境马赛克中,贝类养殖场可为多种近岸鱼类提供觅食生境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Shellfish aquaculture farms as foraging habitat for nearshore fishes and crabs

Shellfish aquaculture farms as foraging habitat for nearshore fishes and crabs

Objective

Oyster reefs across North America have declined precipitously over the past 140 years. In Washington State, Olympia oyster Ostrea lurida reefs historically provided water filtration and nearshore structural habitat for fishes and invertebrates, but this species is now functionally extinct across its historical range. In place of these naturally occurring reefs, shellfish farms consisting mainly of nonnative Pacific oysters Magallana gigas now occupy patches of nearshore habitat across Washington. These farms modify intertidal substrate by adding structural habitat via suspended oyster grow bags, predator exclusion nets, loose oyster beds, and other shellfish grow-out gear. As interest and investment in shellfish aquaculture have expanded both locally and globally, so has interest in how these farms modify intertidal habitat and whether the complex structure created by the shellfish and shellfish growing gear provides ecosystem services that are comparable to those of unfarmed areas, such as mudflats and eelgrass meadows.

Methods

In this study, we sought to quantify how shellfish farms are used as foraging habitat for several common nearshore species of fish and crabs in Puget Sound, Washington. We used direct observations of species-specific behaviors from underwater video to model how habitat type affected observed foraging rates.

Result

We obtained a total of 393 crab observations, 431 demersal fish observations, and 1856 pelagic fish observations across all seven farm sites. Several common species of pelagic fish (e.g., surfperch [Embiotocidae]) used aquaculture-growing gear more frequently than unfarmed areas as foraging habitat, but Metacarcinus spp. crabs displayed higher foraging frequency in unfarmed mudflats. Species groups such as sculpins (Cottidae) and small flatfish (Pleuronectidae) clearly used specific aquaculture-growing gear and mudflats in roughly equal proportion.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that shellfish farms within a larger nearshore habitat mosaic of eelgrass meadows, mudflats, bivalve aquaculture gear, and edge habitat can provide foraging habitat for several species of nearshore fish.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Marine and Coastal Fisheries FISHERIES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science publishes original and innovative research that synthesizes information on biological organization across spatial and temporal scales to promote ecologically sound fisheries science and management. This open-access, online journal published by the American Fisheries Society provides an international venue for studies of marine, coastal, and estuarine fisheries, with emphasis on species'' performance and responses to perturbations in their environment, and promotes the development of ecosystem-based fisheries science and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信