{"title":"[通过平均计算机断层扫描图像中的多条倾斜导线,验证切片灵敏度轮廓测量方法的准确性]。","authors":"Takeshi Fukaya, Katsuhiko Murakami, Masaki Saito, Toshihiko Katakura","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":" ","pages":"390-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Accuracy Verification for Slice Sensitivity Profile Measurement Method by Averaging the Multiple Tilted Wires in Computed Tomography Image].\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Fukaya, Katsuhiko Murakami, Masaki Saito, Toshihiko Katakura\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"390-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Accuracy Verification for Slice Sensitivity Profile Measurement Method by Averaging the Multiple Tilted Wires in Computed Tomography Image].
Purpose: Several studies present the unsuitability of the tilted-wire method for slice sensitivity profile (SSP) in helical scan. We compared the accuracy for SSP by the tilted-wire averaging method using multiple wire profiles and by the conventional micro-coin method.
Methods: A micro-coin phantom positioned at the center or the off-center was scanned using a 64-detector row CT scanner in different positions where an X-ray tube starts scanning. In the same way, tilted-wire averaging phantoms, approximately 70 mm in diameter, in the shape of a donut, 8 wires tilted from the circumference toward the center, were scanned. Images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm.
Results: The relative errors of full width at half maximum (FWHM) by the tilted-wire averaging method were -0.015 mm to -0.004 mm (-1.98% to -0.56%) at the center compared to those by the micro-coin method, and it is almost the same value regardless of the number of wires. Relative errors were 0.001 mm to 0.029 mm (0.11% to 3.74%) at the upper 8 cm from the center, and 0.014 mm to 0.078 mm (1.86% to 10.25%) at the upper 16 cm, and the value of relative errors increased as it got farther from the center and as the number of wires went fewer.
Conclusion: This study indicated that accurate measurement of SSP may be achieved by using 4 (arranged every 90 degrees) or more averaging wires.