手术患者使用留置装置的相关不良事件。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-01
H Wain, S Wall, D L Clarke
{"title":"手术患者使用留置装置的相关不良事件。","authors":"H Wain, S Wall, D L Clarke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events associated with the use of indwelling devices in surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"H Wain, S Wall, D L Clarke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:留置装置(IDs)在现代医疗保健中无处不在,但往往与发病率有关。本文调查了与外科手术患者体内留置装置有关的不良事件,留置装置通常是为了给患者进行治疗、管理输出量或获得特定的治疗效果:方法:2012 年 12 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,对所有与 ID 相关的不良事件进行了基于电子数据库的回顾性评估。所有事件均按设备类型、事件类型和事件严重程度进行分类:结果:研究期间共记录了11 130起发病事件。其中,2 195 个条目与 ID 有关,报告了 2 402 起不良事件,影响了 1 592 名患者。三分之二的患者为男性,受伤患者的年龄从 8 天到 93 岁不等,平均年龄为 36 岁。最常涉及的器械是手术引流管(包括肋间胸腔引流管),占不良事件的 491 例(20.44%)。中心静脉导管(CVC)和静脉插管分别占 374 例(15.57%)和 332 例(13.83%)。最常见的错误类型是意外移除(346 例,13.91%)、未测量输出量(319 例,12.82%)、损伤(314 例,12.62%)和堵塞(279 例,11.21%)。大多数不良事件被认为是轻微的,但有27名(1.1%)患者因与ID相关的不良事件而出现器官功能障碍,7名(0.3%)患者死亡:结论:外科手术患者与ID相关的发病率相对较高。ID插入和护理的标准化、员工教育和沟通的改善已被确定为最重要的策略,我们可以通过这些策略来限制ID患者中与错误相关的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse events associated with the use of indwelling devices in surgical patients.

Background: Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.

Methods: A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.

Results: A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.

Conclusions: Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信