{"title":"手术患者使用留置装置的相关不良事件。","authors":"H Wain, S Wall, D L Clarke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events associated with the use of indwelling devices in surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"H Wain, S Wall, D L Clarke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adverse events associated with the use of indwelling devices in surgical patients.
Background: Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit.
Methods: A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity.
Results: A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died.
Conclusions: Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.
期刊介绍:
The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.