在美国原住民和拉丁裔农村社区开展的家庭 COVID-19 检测实用随机试验的重要启示。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eliza Webber MPH, Sonia Bishop BS, Paul K. Drain MD, MPH, Virgil Dupuis BS, Lorenzo Garza  , Charlie Gregor MPH, Laurie Hassell BS, Geno Ibarra  , Larry Kessler ScD, Linda Ko PhD, Alison Lambert MD, Victoria Lyon MPH, Carly Rowe MSW, Michael Singleton PhD, Matthew Thompson MD, MHS, Teresa Warne MSc, Wendy Westbroek PhD, Alexandra Adams MD, PhD
{"title":"在美国原住民和拉丁裔农村社区开展的家庭 COVID-19 检测实用随机试验的重要启示。","authors":"Eliza Webber MPH,&nbsp;Sonia Bishop BS,&nbsp;Paul K. Drain MD, MPH,&nbsp;Virgil Dupuis BS,&nbsp;Lorenzo Garza  ,&nbsp;Charlie Gregor MPH,&nbsp;Laurie Hassell BS,&nbsp;Geno Ibarra  ,&nbsp;Larry Kessler ScD,&nbsp;Linda Ko PhD,&nbsp;Alison Lambert MD,&nbsp;Victoria Lyon MPH,&nbsp;Carly Rowe MSW,&nbsp;Michael Singleton PhD,&nbsp;Matthew Thompson MD, MHS,&nbsp;Teresa Warne MSc,&nbsp;Wendy Westbroek PhD,&nbsp;Alexandra Adams MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Native Americans and Latinos have higher COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and may have limited access to diagnostic testing. Home-based testing may improve access to care in rural and underserved populations. This study tests the effect of community health worker (CHW) support on accessibility, feasibility, and completion of COVID-19 home testing among Native American and Latino adults living on the Flathead Reservation in Montana and in Yakima Valley, Washington.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A two-arm, multisite, pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted using block randomization stratified by site and participant age. Active arm participants received CHW assistance with online COVID-19 test kit registration and virtual swabbing support. The passive arm participants received standard-of-care support from the kit vendor. Logistic regression modeled the association between study arm and test completion (primary outcome) and between study arm and test completion with return of valid test results (secondary outcome). Responses to posttest surveys and interviews were summarized using deductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 63% of participants (<i>n</i> = 268) completed COVID-19 tests, and 50% completed tests yielding a valid result. Active arm participants had higher odds of test completion (odds ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 2.75]). Differences were most pronounced among adults ≥60 years. Participants cited ease of use and not having to leave home as positive aspects, and transportation and mailing issues as negative aspects of home-based testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CHW support led to higher COVID-19 test completion rates, particularly among older adults. Significant testing barriers included language, educational level, rurality, and test kit issues.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12830","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical lessons from a pragmatic randomized trial of home-based COVID-19 testing in rural Native American and Latino communities\",\"authors\":\"Eliza Webber MPH,&nbsp;Sonia Bishop BS,&nbsp;Paul K. Drain MD, MPH,&nbsp;Virgil Dupuis BS,&nbsp;Lorenzo Garza  ,&nbsp;Charlie Gregor MPH,&nbsp;Laurie Hassell BS,&nbsp;Geno Ibarra  ,&nbsp;Larry Kessler ScD,&nbsp;Linda Ko PhD,&nbsp;Alison Lambert MD,&nbsp;Victoria Lyon MPH,&nbsp;Carly Rowe MSW,&nbsp;Michael Singleton PhD,&nbsp;Matthew Thompson MD, MHS,&nbsp;Teresa Warne MSc,&nbsp;Wendy Westbroek PhD,&nbsp;Alexandra Adams MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native Americans and Latinos have higher COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and may have limited access to diagnostic testing. Home-based testing may improve access to care in rural and underserved populations. This study tests the effect of community health worker (CHW) support on accessibility, feasibility, and completion of COVID-19 home testing among Native American and Latino adults living on the Flathead Reservation in Montana and in Yakima Valley, Washington.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A two-arm, multisite, pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted using block randomization stratified by site and participant age. Active arm participants received CHW assistance with online COVID-19 test kit registration and virtual swabbing support. The passive arm participants received standard-of-care support from the kit vendor. Logistic regression modeled the association between study arm and test completion (primary outcome) and between study arm and test completion with return of valid test results (secondary outcome). Responses to posttest surveys and interviews were summarized using deductive thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 63% of participants (<i>n</i> = 268) completed COVID-19 tests, and 50% completed tests yielding a valid result. Active arm participants had higher odds of test completion (odds ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 2.75]). Differences were most pronounced among adults ≥60 years. Participants cited ease of use and not having to leave home as positive aspects, and transportation and mailing issues as negative aspects of home-based testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>CHW support led to higher COVID-19 test completion rates, particularly among older adults. Significant testing barriers included language, educational level, rurality, and test kit issues.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12830\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12830\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国原住民和拉美人的 COVID-19 感染率和死亡率较高,而且获得诊断检测的机会可能有限。家庭检测可改善农村和服务不足人群的医疗服务。本研究测试了社区健康工作者(CHW)的支持对居住在蒙大拿州平头保留地和华盛顿州雅基玛山谷的美国原住民和拉丁裔成年人进行 COVID-19 家庭检测的可及性、可行性和完成率的影响:采用按地点和参与者年龄分层的整群随机化方法,进行了一项双臂、多地点、务实的随机对照试验。主动研究组的参与者在在线 COVID-19 检测试剂盒注册和虚拟拭抹支持方面接受社区保健工作者的协助。被动组参与者则接受试剂盒供应商提供的标准护理支持。逻辑回归模拟了研究臂与完成测试(主要结果)之间的关系,以及研究臂与完成测试和返回有效测试结果(次要结果)之间的关系。采用演绎主题分析法对测试后调查和访谈的回复进行了总结:总体而言,63% 的参与者(n = 268)完成了 COVID-19 测试,50% 的参与者完成了测试并获得了有效结果。积极治疗组参与者完成测试的几率更高(几率比:1.66,95% 置信区间[1.01, 2.75])。在年龄≥60 岁的成年人中,差异最为明显。参与者认为家庭检测的积极方面是使用方便和无需离家,消极方面是交通和邮寄问题:CHW的支持提高了COVID-19检测的完成率,尤其是在老年人中。重要的检测障碍包括语言、教育水平、农村地区和检测包问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Critical lessons from a pragmatic randomized trial of home-based COVID-19 testing in rural Native American and Latino communities

Critical lessons from a pragmatic randomized trial of home-based COVID-19 testing in rural Native American and Latino communities

Purpose

Native Americans and Latinos have higher COVID-19 infection and mortality rates and may have limited access to diagnostic testing. Home-based testing may improve access to care in rural and underserved populations. This study tests the effect of community health worker (CHW) support on accessibility, feasibility, and completion of COVID-19 home testing among Native American and Latino adults living on the Flathead Reservation in Montana and in Yakima Valley, Washington.

Methods

A two-arm, multisite, pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted using block randomization stratified by site and participant age. Active arm participants received CHW assistance with online COVID-19 test kit registration and virtual swabbing support. The passive arm participants received standard-of-care support from the kit vendor. Logistic regression modeled the association between study arm and test completion (primary outcome) and between study arm and test completion with return of valid test results (secondary outcome). Responses to posttest surveys and interviews were summarized using deductive thematic analysis.

Findings

Overall, 63% of participants (n = 268) completed COVID-19 tests, and 50% completed tests yielding a valid result. Active arm participants had higher odds of test completion (odds ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.01, 2.75]). Differences were most pronounced among adults ≥60 years. Participants cited ease of use and not having to leave home as positive aspects, and transportation and mailing issues as negative aspects of home-based testing.

Conclusions

CHW support led to higher COVID-19 test completion rates, particularly among older adults. Significant testing barriers included language, educational level, rurality, and test kit issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信