与非小细胞肺癌患者对铂类化疗反应相关的基因变异:现场概要和 Meta 分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2024-02-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2024.11835
Hilary Sito, Mohamad Ayub Khan Sharzehan, Md Asiful Islam, Shing Cheng Tan
{"title":"与非小细胞肺癌患者对铂类化疗反应相关的基因变异:现场概要和 Meta 分析。","authors":"Hilary Sito, Mohamad Ayub Khan Sharzehan, Md Asiful Islam, Shing Cheng Tan","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2024.11835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Publications on the associations of genetic variants with the response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in NSCLC patients have surged over the years, but the results have been inconsistent. Here, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to combine eligible studies for a more accurate assessment of the pharmacogenetics of PBC in NSCLC patients. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant publications were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through 15 May 2021. Inclusion criteria for eligible publications include studies that reported genotype and allele frequencies of NSCLC patients treated with PBC, delineated by their treatment response (sensitive vs. resistant). Publications on cell lines or animal models, duplicate reports, and non-primary research were excluded. Epidemiological credibility of cumulative evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Venice criteria. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess publication bias. Cochran's Q-test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to calculate the odds ratio and heterogeneity value to proceed with the random effects or fixed-effects method. Venice criteria were used to assess the strength of evidence, replication methods and protection against bias in the studies. <b>Results:</b> A total of 121 publications comprising 29,478 subjects were included in this study, and meta-analyses were performed on 184 genetic variants. Twelve genetic variants from 10 candidate genes showed significant associations with PBC response in NSCLC patients with strong or moderate cumulative epidemiological evidence (increased risk: <i>ERCC1</i> rs3212986, <i>ERCC2</i> rs1799793, <i>ERCC2</i> rs1052555, and <i>CYP1A1</i> rs1048943; decreased risk: <i>GSTM1</i> rs36631, <i>XRCC1</i> rs1799782 and rs25487, <i>XRCC3</i> rs861539, <i>XPC</i> rs77907221, <i>ABCC2</i> rs717620, <i>ABCG2</i> rs2231142, and <i>CDA</i> rs1048977). Bioinformatics analysis predicted possible damaging or deleterious effects for <i>XRCC1</i> rs1799782 and possible low or medium functional impact for <i>CYP1A1</i> rs1048943. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results provide an up-to-date summary of the association between genetic variants and response to PBC in NSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Variants Associated With Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Field Synopsis and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Sito, Mohamad Ayub Khan Sharzehan, Md Asiful Islam, Shing Cheng Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/bjbs.2024.11835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Publications on the associations of genetic variants with the response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in NSCLC patients have surged over the years, but the results have been inconsistent. Here, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to combine eligible studies for a more accurate assessment of the pharmacogenetics of PBC in NSCLC patients. <b>Methods:</b> Relevant publications were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through 15 May 2021. Inclusion criteria for eligible publications include studies that reported genotype and allele frequencies of NSCLC patients treated with PBC, delineated by their treatment response (sensitive vs. resistant). Publications on cell lines or animal models, duplicate reports, and non-primary research were excluded. Epidemiological credibility of cumulative evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Venice criteria. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess publication bias. Cochran's Q-test and I<sup>2</sup> test were used to calculate the odds ratio and heterogeneity value to proceed with the random effects or fixed-effects method. Venice criteria were used to assess the strength of evidence, replication methods and protection against bias in the studies. <b>Results:</b> A total of 121 publications comprising 29,478 subjects were included in this study, and meta-analyses were performed on 184 genetic variants. Twelve genetic variants from 10 candidate genes showed significant associations with PBC response in NSCLC patients with strong or moderate cumulative epidemiological evidence (increased risk: <i>ERCC1</i> rs3212986, <i>ERCC2</i> rs1799793, <i>ERCC2</i> rs1052555, and <i>CYP1A1</i> rs1048943; decreased risk: <i>GSTM1</i> rs36631, <i>XRCC1</i> rs1799782 and rs25487, <i>XRCC3</i> rs861539, <i>XPC</i> rs77907221, <i>ABCC2</i> rs717620, <i>ABCG2</i> rs2231142, and <i>CDA</i> rs1048977). Bioinformatics analysis predicted possible damaging or deleterious effects for <i>XRCC1</i> rs1799782 and possible low or medium functional impact for <i>CYP1A1</i> rs1048943. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our results provide an up-to-date summary of the association between genetic variants and response to PBC in NSCLC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10914946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Biomedical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.11835\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.11835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多年来,关于基因变异与 NSCLC 患者铂类化疗(PBC)反应相关性的文献激增,但结果并不一致。在此,我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,以合并符合条件的研究,从而更准确地评估 NSCLC 患者 PBC 的药物遗传学。研究方法截至 2021 年 5 月 15 日,在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中检索了相关出版物。符合条件的出版物的纳入标准包括报告了接受 PBC 治疗的 NSCLC 患者的基因型和等位基因频率的研究,并根据其治疗反应(敏感与耐药)进行了划分。不包括细胞系或动物模型、重复报告和非初步研究的出版物。累积证据的流行病学可信度采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和威尼斯标准进行评估。Begg's 和 Egger's 检验用于评估发表偏倚。科克伦 Q 检验和 I2 检验用于计算随机效应法或固定效应法的几率和异质性值。采用 Venice 标准评估研究的证据强度、复制方法和防偏倚保护。研究结果本研究共收录了 121 篇文献,涉及 29 478 名受试者,并对 184 个遗传变异进行了荟萃分析。10 个候选基因中的 12 个基因变异与 NSCLC 患者的 PBC 反应有显著关联,且有较强或中等的累积流行病学证据(风险增加:ERCC1 rs3212986、ERCC2 rs1799793、ERCC2 rs1052555 和 CYP1A1 rs1048943;风险降低:GSTM1 rs36631、XRCC1 rs1799782 和 rs25487、XRCC3 rs861539、XPC rs77907221、ABCC2 rs717620、ABCG2 rs2231142 和 CDA rs1048977)。生物信息学分析预测,XRCC1 rs1799782 可能会产生破坏性或有害影响,CYP1A1 rs1048943 可能会产生低度或中度功能影响。结论我们的研究结果提供了 NSCLC 患者基因变异与 PBC 反应之间关系的最新总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic Variants Associated With Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Field Synopsis and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Publications on the associations of genetic variants with the response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in NSCLC patients have surged over the years, but the results have been inconsistent. Here, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to combine eligible studies for a more accurate assessment of the pharmacogenetics of PBC in NSCLC patients. Methods: Relevant publications were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through 15 May 2021. Inclusion criteria for eligible publications include studies that reported genotype and allele frequencies of NSCLC patients treated with PBC, delineated by their treatment response (sensitive vs. resistant). Publications on cell lines or animal models, duplicate reports, and non-primary research were excluded. Epidemiological credibility of cumulative evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Venice criteria. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to assess publication bias. Cochran's Q-test and I2 test were used to calculate the odds ratio and heterogeneity value to proceed with the random effects or fixed-effects method. Venice criteria were used to assess the strength of evidence, replication methods and protection against bias in the studies. Results: A total of 121 publications comprising 29,478 subjects were included in this study, and meta-analyses were performed on 184 genetic variants. Twelve genetic variants from 10 candidate genes showed significant associations with PBC response in NSCLC patients with strong or moderate cumulative epidemiological evidence (increased risk: ERCC1 rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793, ERCC2 rs1052555, and CYP1A1 rs1048943; decreased risk: GSTM1 rs36631, XRCC1 rs1799782 and rs25487, XRCC3 rs861539, XPC rs77907221, ABCC2 rs717620, ABCG2 rs2231142, and CDA rs1048977). Bioinformatics analysis predicted possible damaging or deleterious effects for XRCC1 rs1799782 and possible low or medium functional impact for CYP1A1 rs1048943. Conclusion: Our results provide an up-to-date summary of the association between genetic variants and response to PBC in NSCLC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信