钢筋混凝土板柱连接剪切强度预测模型的比较分析

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sarmed Wahab, Nasim Shakouri Mahmoudabadi, Sarmad Waqas, Nouman Herl, Muhammad Iqbal, Khurshid Alam, Afaq Ahmad
{"title":"钢筋混凝土板柱连接剪切强度预测模型的比较分析","authors":"Sarmed Wahab, Nasim Shakouri Mahmoudabadi, Sarmad Waqas, Nouman Herl, Muhammad Iqbal, Khurshid Alam, Afaq Ahmad","doi":"10.1155/2024/1784088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (<i>d</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), column dimension (<i>c</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), shear span ratio (<i>a</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>/<i>d</i>), yield strength of longitudinal steel (<i>f</i><sub><i>y</i></sub>), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>l</i></sub>), ultimate load-carrying capacity (<i>V</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>), and concrete compressive strength (<i>f</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections\",\"authors\":\"Sarmed Wahab, Nasim Shakouri Mahmoudabadi, Sarmad Waqas, Nouman Herl, Muhammad Iqbal, Khurshid Alam, Afaq Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1784088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (<i>d</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), column dimension (<i>c</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>), shear span ratio (<i>a</i><sub><i>v</i></sub>/<i>d</i>), yield strength of longitudinal steel (<i>f</i><sub><i>y</i></sub>), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>l</i></sub>), ultimate load-carrying capacity (<i>V</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>), and concrete compressive strength (<i>f</i><sub><i>c</i></sub>). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1784088\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1784088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是结合机器学习、设计规范和有限元分析(FEA),对板柱连接中的抗剪强度预测进行综合比较分析。现有的经验模型缺乏影响参数,从而降低了预测精度。本文采用美国混凝土协会 318-19 (ACI 318-19) 和欧洲规范 2 (EC2) 等现行设计规范,以及压缩力路径法和机器学习模型等创新方法,利用包含 610 个样本的综合数据库预测冲切强度。该数据库包含七个关键参数,包括板深度 (ds)、柱尺寸 (cs)、剪跨比 (av/d)、纵向钢筋屈服强度 (fy)、纵向配筋率 (ρl)、极限承载力 (Vu) 和混凝土抗压强度 (fc)。与设计规范和其他机器学习模型相比,基于粒子群优化的前馈神经网络(PSOFNN)的预测效果最好。PSOFNN 预测平板冲切剪力的准确度最高,R2 值为 99.37%,最小 MSE 值和 MAE 值分别为 0.0275% 和 1.214%。研究结果通过板的有限元分析进行了验证,以确认实验结果和机器学习预测与 PSOFNN 预测的极佳一致性。研究还深入探讨了元启发式模型与 ANN 的应用,揭示了并非所有元启发式模型都能像通常认为的那样优于 ANN。该研究还强调了 EC2 对冲剪力值的预测能力优于 ACI 318-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength Prediction Models for Reinforced Concrete Slab–Column Connections
This research focuses on a comprehensive comparative analysis of shear strength prediction in slab–column connections, integrating machine learning, design codes, and finite element analysis (FEA). The existing empirical models lack the influencing parameters that decrease their prediction accuracy. In this paper, current design codes of American Concrete Institute 318-19 (ACI 318-19) and Eurocode 2 (EC2), as well as innovative approaches like the compressive force path method and machine learning models are employed to predict the punching shear strength using a comprehensive database of 610 samples. The database consists of seven key parameters including slab depth (ds), column dimension (cs), shear span ratio (av/d), yield strength of longitudinal steel (fy), longitudinal reinforcement ratio (ρl), ultimate load-carrying capacity (Vu), and concrete compressive strength (fc). Compared with the design codes and other machine learning models, the particle swarm optimization-based feedforward neural network (PSOFNN) performed the best predictions. PSOFNN predicted the punching shear of flat slab with maximum accuracy with R2 value of 99.37% and least MSE and MAE values of 0.0275% and 1.214%, respectively. The findings of the study are validated through FEA of slabs to confirm experimental results and machine learning predictions that showed excellent agreement with PSOFNN predictions. The research also provides insight into the application of metaheuristic models along with ANN, revealing that not all metaheuristic models can outperform ANN as usually perceived. The study also highlights superior predictive capabilities of EC2 over ACI 318-19 for punching shear values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信