慢性阻塞性肺病和 ILD 肺移植候选者的肺血管压力呼吸波动:大而不同

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Juan C. Grignola, Alvaro Calabuig, Pedro Trujillo, Carles Bravo, Fernando Azpiroz, Manuel López Messeguer, Enric Domingo
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病和 ILD 肺移植候选者的肺血管压力呼吸波动:大而不同","authors":"Juan C. Grignola, Alvaro Calabuig, Pedro Trujillo, Carles Bravo, Fernando Azpiroz, Manuel López Messeguer, Enric Domingo","doi":"10.1002/pul2.12348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed the effect of respiratory swings on interpreting intravascular pulmonary vascular pressures (PVPs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) candidates for lung transplantation (LTx) and the role of the alterations in pulmonary function tests on the dynamic respiratory variations. Twenty-eight consecutive patients were included. All patients underwent a complete hemodynamic study (right atrial, mean pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressures [RAP, mPAP, and PAOP]-) and pulmonary function testing (force vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], and residual volume [RV]). A subgroup of 10 patients underwent simultaneous esophageal pressure (PES). All hemodynamic parameters and PES were collected during apnea after an unforced expiration (ee) and during spontaneous breathing averaging five respiratory cycles (mrc). The respiratory swing (osc) was estimated as the difference between maximum–minimum values of pressures during the respiratory cycle. Intravascular RAPee, mPAPee, and PAOPee were higher than mrc values (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), leading to 11% of pulmonary hypertension (PH) misdiagnosis and 37% of postcapillary PH misclassification. PAOPosc of COPD was higher than ILD patients and RAPosc (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Only PAOPosc correlated with FVC, FEV1, and RV (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). ILD PESmrc was lower than COPD (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and it was associated with a significantly higher transmural than intravascular RAPmrc, mPAPmrc, and PAOPmrc. PESmrc was significantly correlated with FVC. Transmural mPAPmrc and PAOPmrc readings determined around 20% of reclassification of the patients compared to ee measurements. Candidates for LTx showed large respiratory swings in PVP, which were correlated with pulmonary function alterations. mrc PVP would be more closely approximated to the true transmural PVP leading to PH reclassification. Adjusting PVP for PES should be considered in COPD and ILD candidates of LTx with severe alterations in pulmonary functional tests and suspicion of a PESmrc far from 0. PES respiratory swings could be different in ILD to COPD patients.","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary vascular pressure respiratory swings in COPD and ILD candidates for lung transplantation: Large but different\",\"authors\":\"Juan C. Grignola, Alvaro Calabuig, Pedro Trujillo, Carles Bravo, Fernando Azpiroz, Manuel López Messeguer, Enric Domingo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.12348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyzed the effect of respiratory swings on interpreting intravascular pulmonary vascular pressures (PVPs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) candidates for lung transplantation (LTx) and the role of the alterations in pulmonary function tests on the dynamic respiratory variations. Twenty-eight consecutive patients were included. All patients underwent a complete hemodynamic study (right atrial, mean pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressures [RAP, mPAP, and PAOP]-) and pulmonary function testing (force vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], and residual volume [RV]). A subgroup of 10 patients underwent simultaneous esophageal pressure (PES). All hemodynamic parameters and PES were collected during apnea after an unforced expiration (ee) and during spontaneous breathing averaging five respiratory cycles (mrc). The respiratory swing (osc) was estimated as the difference between maximum–minimum values of pressures during the respiratory cycle. Intravascular RAPee, mPAPee, and PAOPee were higher than mrc values (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), leading to 11% of pulmonary hypertension (PH) misdiagnosis and 37% of postcapillary PH misclassification. PAOPosc of COPD was higher than ILD patients and RAPosc (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Only PAOPosc correlated with FVC, FEV1, and RV (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). ILD PESmrc was lower than COPD (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and it was associated with a significantly higher transmural than intravascular RAPmrc, mPAPmrc, and PAOPmrc. PESmrc was significantly correlated with FVC. Transmural mPAPmrc and PAOPmrc readings determined around 20% of reclassification of the patients compared to ee measurements. Candidates for LTx showed large respiratory swings in PVP, which were correlated with pulmonary function alterations. mrc PVP would be more closely approximated to the true transmural PVP leading to PH reclassification. Adjusting PVP for PES should be considered in COPD and ILD candidates of LTx with severe alterations in pulmonary functional tests and suspicion of a PESmrc far from 0. PES respiratory swings could be different in ILD to COPD patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了呼吸摆动对解释慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和间质性肺疾病(ILD)肺移植(LTx)候选者血管内肺血管压(PVPs)的影响,以及肺功能测试改变对动态呼吸变化的作用。该研究连续纳入了 28 名患者。所有患者均接受了完整的血液动力学检查(右心房压、平均肺动脉压和肺动脉闭塞压[RAP, mPAP, and PAOP]-)和肺功能测试(肺活量[FVC]、第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]和残气量[RV])。10名患者组成的子组同时接受了食管压力(PES)检查。所有血液动力学参数和 PES 都是在非强制呼气(ee)后的呼吸暂停期间和平均五个呼吸周期(mrc)的自主呼吸期间采集的。呼吸摆动(osc)是根据呼吸周期内压力最大值与最小值之差估算的。血管内 RAPee、mPAPee 和 PAOPee 均高于 mrc 值(p < 0.05),导致 11% 的肺动脉高压(PH)误诊和 37% 的毛细血管后 PH 误诊。COPD 患者的 PAOPosc 值高于 ILD 患者和 RAPosc 值(P < 0.05)。只有 PAOPosc 与 FVC、FEV1 和 RV 相关(p < 0.05)。ILD 的 PESmrc 低于 COPD(p <0.05),且其与跨膜 RAPmrc、mPAPmrc 和 PAOPmrc 的相关性显著高于血管内 RAPmrc、mPAPmrc 和 PAOPmrc。PESmrc 与 FVC 显著相关。与ee测量值相比,经壁mPAPmrc和PAOPmrc读数决定了约20%的患者重新分类。mrc PVP 更接近真实的经壁式 PVP,可对 PH 进行重新分类。如果 COPD 和 ILD 患者的肺功能检查出现严重变化,并怀疑 PESmrc 远远低于 0,则应考虑根据 PES 调整 PVP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary vascular pressure respiratory swings in COPD and ILD candidates for lung transplantation: Large but different
We analyzed the effect of respiratory swings on interpreting intravascular pulmonary vascular pressures (PVPs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) candidates for lung transplantation (LTx) and the role of the alterations in pulmonary function tests on the dynamic respiratory variations. Twenty-eight consecutive patients were included. All patients underwent a complete hemodynamic study (right atrial, mean pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressures [RAP, mPAP, and PAOP]-) and pulmonary function testing (force vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], and residual volume [RV]). A subgroup of 10 patients underwent simultaneous esophageal pressure (PES). All hemodynamic parameters and PES were collected during apnea after an unforced expiration (ee) and during spontaneous breathing averaging five respiratory cycles (mrc). The respiratory swing (osc) was estimated as the difference between maximum–minimum values of pressures during the respiratory cycle. Intravascular RAPee, mPAPee, and PAOPee were higher than mrc values (p < 0.05), leading to 11% of pulmonary hypertension (PH) misdiagnosis and 37% of postcapillary PH misclassification. PAOPosc of COPD was higher than ILD patients and RAPosc (p < 0.05). Only PAOPosc correlated with FVC, FEV1, and RV (p < 0.05). ILD PESmrc was lower than COPD (p < 0.05), and it was associated with a significantly higher transmural than intravascular RAPmrc, mPAPmrc, and PAOPmrc. PESmrc was significantly correlated with FVC. Transmural mPAPmrc and PAOPmrc readings determined around 20% of reclassification of the patients compared to ee measurements. Candidates for LTx showed large respiratory swings in PVP, which were correlated with pulmonary function alterations. mrc PVP would be more closely approximated to the true transmural PVP leading to PH reclassification. Adjusting PVP for PES should be considered in COPD and ILD candidates of LTx with severe alterations in pulmonary functional tests and suspicion of a PESmrc far from 0. PES respiratory swings could be different in ILD to COPD patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信