让暴力无所遁形:用台下暴力表现压迫制度

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Richard Gilbert
{"title":"让暴力无所遁形:用台下暴力表现压迫制度","authors":"Richard Gilbert","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a920789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Keeping the Violence Out of Sight:<span>Representing Systems of Oppression with Offstage Violence</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Gilbert (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Sometimes what we don't see with our own eyes can hit harder than what we do, and for those who create theatre that challenges the potent imbedded systems of violence by which our society oppresses so many of its people, hitting hard is crucial. Contemporary theatremakers are often deeply interested in telling stories that thematize institutional or systemic violence. Many contemporary plays thematize the violent structures under which we live in an attempt to come to terms with them, while many older plays are re-imagined by directors and producers in ways that inject the theme of systemic violence where it might have been only latent in or even absent from the source text. In drama, it is hard to directly represent mass violence. Generally a play will focus on a few characters, some of whom will represent systems of oppression by enacting violence on others who represent the oppressed. When violence is represented mimetically on stage in this way, there is always the danger that the audience will receive it as specific violence against a specific character rather than as part of a broader societal issue.<sup>1</sup></p> <p>Anyone involved in public discourse, whether on social media or in the mainstream news, will be sadly familiar with the experience of trying to talk about a system but inevitably ending up in a discussion of the specific. All too often, for example, discussions of police violence get derailed by interlocutors treating every example as a singular event rather than as evidence of a systemic problem that needs solving. The problem is that focus on a specific incident obfuscates the systemic issue and can end up being misread as an argument that the problem itself is specific <strong>[End Page 131]</strong> rather than systemic. That is, no matter how many examples there are of police murder, some people will insist on referring to each as \"one bad apple.\" Representing systemic violence onstage through direct mimetic illusions of specific acts of violence (so, for example, showing a cop killing a person of color or a homophobe brutalizing a queer character) can generate a similar cognitive challenge for an audience because we are used to identifying with individual characters. The shock of violence can exacerbate the problem as it tends to increase our empathic response, making it harder for even a critically engaged audience to focus out to the systemic issues at play.</p> <p>Offstage violence can be a potent solution to the problem of representing systemic and institutional violence. I will argue that there are three primary qualities of offstage violence that make it so effective in this regard. The first is that there are metaphorical links between offstage violence and systemic violence. Like systems of oppression, offstage violence works \"behind the scenes.\" Further, because we do not see the perpetrator enact the violence, there is a faceless quality that again suggests a system rather than an instance. The other two qualities which I want to discuss are a bit more theoretical, but no less effective for all that. Of these, the first is offstage violence's capacity to create tension and the other is its capacity to limit the collapse of aesthetic distance.</p> <p>There are many contemporary plays and productions which have used offstage violence to solve this problem, from the activist, like Sarah Shourd's <em>The Box</em> or Belarus Free Theatre's <em>Time of Women</em>, to the more philosophical, like Jennifer Haley's <em>The Nether</em>. In this article I will start by discussing a 2013 production of Lee Blessing's <em>Lonesome Hollow</em>, which deals with the American prison industrial complex, and a 2008 production of Marlowe's <em>Edward II</em>, which used offstage violence to effectively focus attention on systemic violence against LGBTQ people. It was in discussing these two plays that I first noticed the connections between institutional and offstage violence, and my preference is always to discuss specific productions when I am making an argument about how things might be staged. But my argument can be extended to scripts, not just productions; I will present a reading of Martin McDonagh's <em>The Pillowman</em> that demonstrates...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping the Violence Out of Sight: Representing Systems of Oppression with Offstage Violence\",\"authors\":\"Richard Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cdr.2024.a920789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Keeping the Violence Out of Sight:<span>Representing Systems of Oppression with Offstage Violence</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Gilbert (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Sometimes what we don't see with our own eyes can hit harder than what we do, and for those who create theatre that challenges the potent imbedded systems of violence by which our society oppresses so many of its people, hitting hard is crucial. Contemporary theatremakers are often deeply interested in telling stories that thematize institutional or systemic violence. Many contemporary plays thematize the violent structures under which we live in an attempt to come to terms with them, while many older plays are re-imagined by directors and producers in ways that inject the theme of systemic violence where it might have been only latent in or even absent from the source text. In drama, it is hard to directly represent mass violence. Generally a play will focus on a few characters, some of whom will represent systems of oppression by enacting violence on others who represent the oppressed. When violence is represented mimetically on stage in this way, there is always the danger that the audience will receive it as specific violence against a specific character rather than as part of a broader societal issue.<sup>1</sup></p> <p>Anyone involved in public discourse, whether on social media or in the mainstream news, will be sadly familiar with the experience of trying to talk about a system but inevitably ending up in a discussion of the specific. All too often, for example, discussions of police violence get derailed by interlocutors treating every example as a singular event rather than as evidence of a systemic problem that needs solving. The problem is that focus on a specific incident obfuscates the systemic issue and can end up being misread as an argument that the problem itself is specific <strong>[End Page 131]</strong> rather than systemic. That is, no matter how many examples there are of police murder, some people will insist on referring to each as \\\"one bad apple.\\\" Representing systemic violence onstage through direct mimetic illusions of specific acts of violence (so, for example, showing a cop killing a person of color or a homophobe brutalizing a queer character) can generate a similar cognitive challenge for an audience because we are used to identifying with individual characters. The shock of violence can exacerbate the problem as it tends to increase our empathic response, making it harder for even a critically engaged audience to focus out to the systemic issues at play.</p> <p>Offstage violence can be a potent solution to the problem of representing systemic and institutional violence. I will argue that there are three primary qualities of offstage violence that make it so effective in this regard. The first is that there are metaphorical links between offstage violence and systemic violence. Like systems of oppression, offstage violence works \\\"behind the scenes.\\\" Further, because we do not see the perpetrator enact the violence, there is a faceless quality that again suggests a system rather than an instance. The other two qualities which I want to discuss are a bit more theoretical, but no less effective for all that. Of these, the first is offstage violence's capacity to create tension and the other is its capacity to limit the collapse of aesthetic distance.</p> <p>There are many contemporary plays and productions which have used offstage violence to solve this problem, from the activist, like Sarah Shourd's <em>The Box</em> or Belarus Free Theatre's <em>Time of Women</em>, to the more philosophical, like Jennifer Haley's <em>The Nether</em>. In this article I will start by discussing a 2013 production of Lee Blessing's <em>Lonesome Hollow</em>, which deals with the American prison industrial complex, and a 2008 production of Marlowe's <em>Edward II</em>, which used offstage violence to effectively focus attention on systemic violence against LGBTQ people. It was in discussing these two plays that I first noticed the connections between institutional and offstage violence, and my preference is always to discuss specific productions when I am making an argument about how things might be staged. But my argument can be extended to scripts, not just productions; I will present a reading of Martin McDonagh's <em>The Pillowman</em> that demonstrates...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a920789\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a920789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 让暴力远离我们的视线:用台下的暴力表现压迫制度 理查德-吉尔伯特(Richard Gilbert)(简历) 有时候,我们没有亲眼看到的东西会比我们亲眼看到的东西更有冲击力,而对于那些创作戏剧挑战我们社会压迫众多人的根深蒂固的暴力制度的人来说,冲击力是至关重要的。当代剧作家往往对讲述将制度性或系统性暴力主题化的故事深感兴趣。许多当代戏剧将我们生活在其中的暴力结构主题化,试图与之和解,而许多老戏剧则被导演和制片人重新想象,注入了系统性暴力的主题,而这一主题在原始文本中可能只是潜在的,甚至是不存在的。在戏剧中,很难直接表现大规模暴力。一般来说,一部戏剧会集中在几个人物身上,其中一些人通过对其他代表被压迫者的人实施暴力来代表压迫制度。1 任何参与公共讨论的人,无论是在社交媒体上还是在主流新闻中,都会对这样的经历深有体会:试图讨论一个系统,但最终却不可避免地陷入对具体问题的讨论。例如,关于警察暴力的讨论常常因为对话者将每一个事例都视为单一事件而非需要解决的系统性问题的证据而偏离正轨。问题在于,对具体事件的关注混淆了系统性问题,最终可能被误读为问题本身是具体的 [第 131 页完] 而不是系统性的。也就是说,无论有多少警察谋杀的例子,有些人都会坚持把每个例子都说成是 "一个坏苹果"。在舞台上通过直接模仿具体的暴力行为来表现系统性暴力(例如,展示警察杀害有色人种或同性恋者残害同性恋角色),会给观众带来类似的认知挑战,因为我们习惯于认同单个角色。暴力带来的震撼会加剧这一问题,因为它往往会增强我们的移情反应,即使是具有批判精神的观众也很难关注到正在发生的系统性问题。台下暴力可以有效解决系统性和制度性暴力的问题。我认为,台下暴力有三个主要特质使其在这方面如此有效。首先,台下暴力与制度暴力之间存在隐喻联系。与压迫制度一样,台下暴力也是在 "幕后 "运作。此外,由于我们看不到施暴者实施暴力,因此有一种不露面的特质,再次表明这是一个系统,而不是一个实例。我想讨论的另外两个特质更理论化一些,但效果并不差。其中,第一种是台下暴力制造紧张气氛的能力,另一种是限制审美距离崩溃的能力。当代有许多戏剧和作品都利用台下暴力来解决这一问题,其中既有激进的,如莎拉-舒德(Sarah Shourd)的《盒子》(The Box)或白俄罗斯自由剧院(Belarus Free Theatre)的《女人时代》(Time of Women),也有更具哲学意味的,如詹妮弗-海利(Jennifer Haley)的《何方》(The Nether)。在本文中,我将首先讨论 2013 年李-布莱辛(Lee Blessing)的《寂寞空谷》(Lonesome Hollow)和 2008 年马洛(Marlowe)的《爱德华二世》(Edward II),前者涉及美国监狱工业综合体问题,后者则利用台下暴力有效地关注针对 LGBTQ 的系统性暴力。在讨论这两部戏剧时,我第一次注意到制度性暴力与台下暴力之间的联系,而我在论证如何上演时,总是倾向于讨论具体的作品。但我的论点可以延伸到剧本,而不仅仅是作品;我将对马丁-麦克唐纳的《枕头人》进行解读,以证明......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keeping the Violence Out of Sight: Representing Systems of Oppression with Offstage Violence
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Keeping the Violence Out of Sight:Representing Systems of Oppression with Offstage Violence
  • Richard Gilbert (bio)

Sometimes what we don't see with our own eyes can hit harder than what we do, and for those who create theatre that challenges the potent imbedded systems of violence by which our society oppresses so many of its people, hitting hard is crucial. Contemporary theatremakers are often deeply interested in telling stories that thematize institutional or systemic violence. Many contemporary plays thematize the violent structures under which we live in an attempt to come to terms with them, while many older plays are re-imagined by directors and producers in ways that inject the theme of systemic violence where it might have been only latent in or even absent from the source text. In drama, it is hard to directly represent mass violence. Generally a play will focus on a few characters, some of whom will represent systems of oppression by enacting violence on others who represent the oppressed. When violence is represented mimetically on stage in this way, there is always the danger that the audience will receive it as specific violence against a specific character rather than as part of a broader societal issue.1

Anyone involved in public discourse, whether on social media or in the mainstream news, will be sadly familiar with the experience of trying to talk about a system but inevitably ending up in a discussion of the specific. All too often, for example, discussions of police violence get derailed by interlocutors treating every example as a singular event rather than as evidence of a systemic problem that needs solving. The problem is that focus on a specific incident obfuscates the systemic issue and can end up being misread as an argument that the problem itself is specific [End Page 131] rather than systemic. That is, no matter how many examples there are of police murder, some people will insist on referring to each as "one bad apple." Representing systemic violence onstage through direct mimetic illusions of specific acts of violence (so, for example, showing a cop killing a person of color or a homophobe brutalizing a queer character) can generate a similar cognitive challenge for an audience because we are used to identifying with individual characters. The shock of violence can exacerbate the problem as it tends to increase our empathic response, making it harder for even a critically engaged audience to focus out to the systemic issues at play.

Offstage violence can be a potent solution to the problem of representing systemic and institutional violence. I will argue that there are three primary qualities of offstage violence that make it so effective in this regard. The first is that there are metaphorical links between offstage violence and systemic violence. Like systems of oppression, offstage violence works "behind the scenes." Further, because we do not see the perpetrator enact the violence, there is a faceless quality that again suggests a system rather than an instance. The other two qualities which I want to discuss are a bit more theoretical, but no less effective for all that. Of these, the first is offstage violence's capacity to create tension and the other is its capacity to limit the collapse of aesthetic distance.

There are many contemporary plays and productions which have used offstage violence to solve this problem, from the activist, like Sarah Shourd's The Box or Belarus Free Theatre's Time of Women, to the more philosophical, like Jennifer Haley's The Nether. In this article I will start by discussing a 2013 production of Lee Blessing's Lonesome Hollow, which deals with the American prison industrial complex, and a 2008 production of Marlowe's Edward II, which used offstage violence to effectively focus attention on systemic violence against LGBTQ people. It was in discussing these two plays that I first noticed the connections between institutional and offstage violence, and my preference is always to discuss specific productions when I am making an argument about how things might be staged. But my argument can be extended to scripts, not just productions; I will present a reading of Martin McDonagh's The Pillowman that demonstrates...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信