Pamela Scarlett Espinoza Loyola , Diana Laura Muratalla Bautista , Karen Adela Hernández Bautista , Elizabeth Gil White , José Antonio González Moreno , Daniel Angel Torres del Real , Víctor Manuel Páez Zayas , Carla Escorza-Molina , Fernando Mondragón Rodríguez , Omar Vásquez Gómez , Luis Jorge Fernández López , Paul Santiago Mogrovejo Vázquez , Isidoro Aczel Sánchez-Cedillo , Víctor Jose Visag Castillo
{"title":"肝细胞癌患者肝移植选择标准的预后作用:综述和文献计量学","authors":"Pamela Scarlett Espinoza Loyola , Diana Laura Muratalla Bautista , Karen Adela Hernández Bautista , Elizabeth Gil White , José Antonio González Moreno , Daniel Angel Torres del Real , Víctor Manuel Páez Zayas , Carla Escorza-Molina , Fernando Mondragón Rodríguez , Omar Vásquez Gómez , Luis Jorge Fernández López , Paul Santiago Mogrovejo Vázquez , Isidoro Aczel Sánchez-Cedillo , Víctor Jose Visag Castillo","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2024.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world and is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation, liver transplantation is the gold standard treatment for end stage liver disease. Diagnosis is based up on radiological characteristics and rarely biopsy results. However treatment must be individualized to each patient to improve recurrences and outcomes. In this article, we focus on the different selection criteria for liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the distribution laws and research frontiers of international literature, so as to present holistic bibliometric evaluation of the studies on 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence in 5 years, according to hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. The paper aims to review and analyze 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence based on hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. It systematically examines and summarizes distribution characteristics and research frontiers through bibliometric analysis. A bibliographic search was implemented in PubMed/Medline, Clinical Key, Science Direct and Index Medicus with MESH terms, from the year 1996–2022. Patients selected for transplantation using the Metroticket 2.0 (MT2) criteria had the highest overall survival along with patients selected for transplantation using the Milan Criteria had the best 5-year disease-free recurrence. The Metroticket 2.0 criteria (MT2) and Milan Criteria (MC) have shown the most favorable post-transplant outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, MC demonstrated the best 5-year disease-free recurrence rate, underscoring the significance of taking into account tumor morphology and biology when determining the eligibility of HCC patients for liver transplantation. The distribution characteristics and research frontiers by bibliometrics concerning prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma the collaborations are sufficient to reach a consensus that the Milan criteria are the best criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000021/pdfft?md5=9a6497898d12245cd13ea8b00292d9d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772947824000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Review and bibliometric\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Scarlett Espinoza Loyola , Diana Laura Muratalla Bautista , Karen Adela Hernández Bautista , Elizabeth Gil White , José Antonio González Moreno , Daniel Angel Torres del Real , Víctor Manuel Páez Zayas , Carla Escorza-Molina , Fernando Mondragón Rodríguez , Omar Vásquez Gómez , Luis Jorge Fernández López , Paul Santiago Mogrovejo Vázquez , Isidoro Aczel Sánchez-Cedillo , Víctor Jose Visag Castillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iliver.2024.100077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world and is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation, liver transplantation is the gold standard treatment for end stage liver disease. Diagnosis is based up on radiological characteristics and rarely biopsy results. However treatment must be individualized to each patient to improve recurrences and outcomes. In this article, we focus on the different selection criteria for liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the distribution laws and research frontiers of international literature, so as to present holistic bibliometric evaluation of the studies on 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence in 5 years, according to hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. The paper aims to review and analyze 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence based on hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. It systematically examines and summarizes distribution characteristics and research frontiers through bibliometric analysis. A bibliographic search was implemented in PubMed/Medline, Clinical Key, Science Direct and Index Medicus with MESH terms, from the year 1996–2022. Patients selected for transplantation using the Metroticket 2.0 (MT2) criteria had the highest overall survival along with patients selected for transplantation using the Milan Criteria had the best 5-year disease-free recurrence. The Metroticket 2.0 criteria (MT2) and Milan Criteria (MC) have shown the most favorable post-transplant outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, MC demonstrated the best 5-year disease-free recurrence rate, underscoring the significance of taking into account tumor morphology and biology when determining the eligibility of HCC patients for liver transplantation. The distribution characteristics and research frontiers by bibliometrics concerning prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma the collaborations are sufficient to reach a consensus that the Milan criteria are the best criteria.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iLIVER\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000021/pdfft?md5=9a6497898d12245cd13ea8b00292d9d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772947824000021-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iLIVER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947824000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肝细胞癌(HCC)是世界上最常见的癌症之一,也是肝移植的主要适应症之一,肝移植是治疗终末期肝病的金标准。诊断主要基于放射学特征,很少有活检结果。然而,治疗必须因人而异,以改善复发率和治疗效果。本文将重点讨论肝移植的不同选择标准。本研究旨在探究国际文献的分布规律和研究前沿,从而根据肝癌的肝移植标准,对5年生存率和5年无病复发率的研究进行整体文献计量学评价。本文旨在回顾和分析根据肝癌标准进行肝移植的 5 年生存率和无病复发率。它通过文献计量分析系统地研究和总结了分布特点和研究前沿。研究人员使用 MESH 术语在 PubMed/Medline、Clinical Key、Science Direct 和 Index Medicus 中进行了文献检索,时间跨度为 1996-2022 年。采用 Metroticket 2.0 (MT2) 标准选择移植的患者总生存率最高,而采用米兰标准选择移植的患者 5 年无疾病复发率最高。Metroticket 2.0 标准(MT2)和米兰标准(MC)对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的移植后疗效最为有利。然而,MC 的 5 年无病复发率最高,这说明在确定 HCC 患者是否符合肝移植条件时,考虑肿瘤形态学和生物学因素具有重要意义。通过文献计量学对肝细胞癌患者肝移植选择标准的预后作用的分布特点和研究前沿进行分析,足以达成米兰标准是最佳标准的共识。
Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Review and bibliometric
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world and is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation, liver transplantation is the gold standard treatment for end stage liver disease. Diagnosis is based up on radiological characteristics and rarely biopsy results. However treatment must be individualized to each patient to improve recurrences and outcomes. In this article, we focus on the different selection criteria for liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the distribution laws and research frontiers of international literature, so as to present holistic bibliometric evaluation of the studies on 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence in 5 years, according to hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. The paper aims to review and analyze 5-year survival and disease-free recurrence based on hepatocarcinoma criteria for liver transplantation. It systematically examines and summarizes distribution characteristics and research frontiers through bibliometric analysis. A bibliographic search was implemented in PubMed/Medline, Clinical Key, Science Direct and Index Medicus with MESH terms, from the year 1996–2022. Patients selected for transplantation using the Metroticket 2.0 (MT2) criteria had the highest overall survival along with patients selected for transplantation using the Milan Criteria had the best 5-year disease-free recurrence. The Metroticket 2.0 criteria (MT2) and Milan Criteria (MC) have shown the most favorable post-transplant outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, MC demonstrated the best 5-year disease-free recurrence rate, underscoring the significance of taking into account tumor morphology and biology when determining the eligibility of HCC patients for liver transplantation. The distribution characteristics and research frontiers by bibliometrics concerning prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma the collaborations are sufficient to reach a consensus that the Milan criteria are the best criteria.