学术付费者模式:护理与保险。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Population Health Management Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1089/pop.2023.0300
Erika D Harness, Zachary N Goldberg, Yash B Shah, Akshay S Krishnan, Varun Jayanti, David B Nash
{"title":"学术付费者模式:护理与保险。","authors":"Erika D Harness, Zachary N Goldberg, Yash B Shah, Akshay S Krishnan, Varun Jayanti, David B Nash","doi":"10.1089/pop.2023.0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US health care system has significant room for growth to achieve the Quintuple Aim. Reforming the relationship between payers and providers is pivotal to enhancing value-based care (VBC). The Payvider model, a joint approach to care and coverage rooted in vertical integration, is a potential solution. The authors aimed to investigate academic medical institutions adopting this model, termed <i>Academic Payviders</i>. All Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)-member allopathic medical schools were evaluated to identify programs meeting the inclusion criteria of offering both medical care and insurance coverage to patients via partnership with a payer or ownership of, or by, a payer. Twenty-five Academic Payvider systems were identified from 171 total AAMC-member programs. Most programs were founded after 2009 (<i>n</i> = 20), utilized a provider-dominant structural model (<i>n</i> = 17), and offered health plans to patients via Medicare Advantage (<i>n</i> = 23). Passage of the Affordable Care Act, recent trends in health care consolidation, and increased political and financial prioritization of social determinants of health (SDOH) may help to explain the rise of this care and coverage model. The Academic Payvider movement could advance academic medicine toward greater acceptance of VBC via innovations in medical education, resource stewardship in residency, and the establishment of innovative leadership positions at the administrative level.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"160-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Academic Payvider Model: Care and Coverage.\",\"authors\":\"Erika D Harness, Zachary N Goldberg, Yash B Shah, Akshay S Krishnan, Varun Jayanti, David B Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pop.2023.0300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US health care system has significant room for growth to achieve the Quintuple Aim. Reforming the relationship between payers and providers is pivotal to enhancing value-based care (VBC). The Payvider model, a joint approach to care and coverage rooted in vertical integration, is a potential solution. The authors aimed to investigate academic medical institutions adopting this model, termed <i>Academic Payviders</i>. All Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)-member allopathic medical schools were evaluated to identify programs meeting the inclusion criteria of offering both medical care and insurance coverage to patients via partnership with a payer or ownership of, or by, a payer. Twenty-five Academic Payvider systems were identified from 171 total AAMC-member programs. Most programs were founded after 2009 (<i>n</i> = 20), utilized a provider-dominant structural model (<i>n</i> = 17), and offered health plans to patients via Medicare Advantage (<i>n</i> = 23). Passage of the Affordable Care Act, recent trends in health care consolidation, and increased political and financial prioritization of social determinants of health (SDOH) may help to explain the rise of this care and coverage model. The Academic Payvider movement could advance academic medicine toward greater acceptance of VBC via innovations in medical education, resource stewardship in residency, and the establishment of innovative leadership positions at the administrative level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2023.0300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国医疗保健系统在实现 "五重目标"(Quintuple Aim)方面还有很大的发展空间。改革支付方和提供方之间的关系,是提升价值医疗(VBC)的关键。支付方模式是一种植根于纵向整合的医疗和保险联合方法,是一种潜在的解决方案。作者旨在调查采用这种模式的学术医疗机构,并将其称为 "学术支付方"。作者对所有美国医学院协会(AAMC)成员的全科医学院进行了评估,以确定哪些项目符合纳入标准,即通过与支付方合作或拥有支付方或支付方为患者提供医疗和保险服务。在全部 171 个 AAMC 成员项目中,确定了 25 个学术支付方系统。大多数项目成立于 2009 年之后(20 个),采用医疗提供方主导的结构模式(17 个),并通过医疗保险优势项目(23 个)向患者提供医疗计划。平价医疗法案》的通过、近期医疗保健整合的趋势以及政治和财政对健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的优先考虑可能有助于解释这种医疗和保险模式的兴起。学术付费者运动可以通过医学教育的创新、住院医师培训中的资源管理以及在行政层面设立创新领导职位,推动学术医学朝着更大程度地接受 VBC 的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Academic Payvider Model: Care and Coverage.

The US health care system has significant room for growth to achieve the Quintuple Aim. Reforming the relationship between payers and providers is pivotal to enhancing value-based care (VBC). The Payvider model, a joint approach to care and coverage rooted in vertical integration, is a potential solution. The authors aimed to investigate academic medical institutions adopting this model, termed Academic Payviders. All Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)-member allopathic medical schools were evaluated to identify programs meeting the inclusion criteria of offering both medical care and insurance coverage to patients via partnership with a payer or ownership of, or by, a payer. Twenty-five Academic Payvider systems were identified from 171 total AAMC-member programs. Most programs were founded after 2009 (n = 20), utilized a provider-dominant structural model (n = 17), and offered health plans to patients via Medicare Advantage (n = 23). Passage of the Affordable Care Act, recent trends in health care consolidation, and increased political and financial prioritization of social determinants of health (SDOH) may help to explain the rise of this care and coverage model. The Academic Payvider movement could advance academic medicine toward greater acceptance of VBC via innovations in medical education, resource stewardship in residency, and the establishment of innovative leadership positions at the administrative level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信