内侧站立高举手臂(SOAR)测试作为功能性髋关节内收运动测量方法的可靠性和有效性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1177/02692155241236600
Jason Grimes, Justin Wager, Casey DiZinno, Thomas Fogarty, Eric Hund, Brendan Rooney, Taylor Roy, Jon Goldfarb, Paul Bauer
{"title":"内侧站立高举手臂(SOAR)测试作为功能性髋关节内收运动测量方法的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Jason Grimes, Justin Wager, Casey DiZinno, Thomas Fogarty, Eric Hund, Brendan Rooney, Taylor Roy, Jon Goldfarb, Paul Bauer","doi":"10.1177/02692155241236600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Posterior Standing Overhead Arm Reach (SOAR) test has been previously reported as a reliable clinical measure of closed chain hip extension motion. The proposed Medial SOAR test expands on that testing approach to provide a similar measure of functional hip adduction motion. This was a preliminary intrarater and interrater reliability and validity study of the Medial SOAR test as a measure of functional hip adduction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University motion analysis laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty hips were assessed in 25 (22 female) asymptomatic participants (mean age = 23.4 years, SD = 0.8).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Maximum hip adduction during the Medial SOAR test was measured with a standard goniometer independently by two examiners. The test was also performed using three-dimensional motion capture. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the goniometric measure was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, and the relationship between measures obtained via goniometry and three-dimensional motion capture was assessed with Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrarater reliability (ICC<sub>2,3</sub>) was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.92) for Examiner 1 and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79-0.92) for Examiner 2. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were less than 3.0°. Interrater reliability demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62 (95% CI = 0.28-0.79). Pearson correlations were significant with low-to-moderate associations (r = 0.49, <i>P </i>< 0.001; r = 0.24, <i>P </i>= 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to the previously reported Posterior SOAR test, the Medial SOAR test demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability, along with low-to-moderate associations with three-dimensional motion capture. The Medial SOAR test has the potential to provide a reliable and accurate assessment of closed chain hip adduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"955-964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the medial standing overhead arm reach (SOAR) test as a measure of functional hip adduction motion.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Grimes, Justin Wager, Casey DiZinno, Thomas Fogarty, Eric Hund, Brendan Rooney, Taylor Roy, Jon Goldfarb, Paul Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241236600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Posterior Standing Overhead Arm Reach (SOAR) test has been previously reported as a reliable clinical measure of closed chain hip extension motion. The proposed Medial SOAR test expands on that testing approach to provide a similar measure of functional hip adduction motion. This was a preliminary intrarater and interrater reliability and validity study of the Medial SOAR test as a measure of functional hip adduction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University motion analysis laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty hips were assessed in 25 (22 female) asymptomatic participants (mean age = 23.4 years, SD = 0.8).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Maximum hip adduction during the Medial SOAR test was measured with a standard goniometer independently by two examiners. The test was also performed using three-dimensional motion capture. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the goniometric measure was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, and the relationship between measures obtained via goniometry and three-dimensional motion capture was assessed with Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intrarater reliability (ICC<sub>2,3</sub>) was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.92) for Examiner 1 and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79-0.92) for Examiner 2. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were less than 3.0°. Interrater reliability demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62 (95% CI = 0.28-0.79). Pearson correlations were significant with low-to-moderate associations (r = 0.49, <i>P </i>< 0.001; r = 0.24, <i>P </i>= 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to the previously reported Posterior SOAR test, the Medial SOAR test demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability, along with low-to-moderate associations with three-dimensional motion capture. The Medial SOAR test has the potential to provide a reliable and accurate assessment of closed chain hip adduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"955-964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241236600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,后方站立高举手臂(SOAR)测试是一种可靠的闭合链髋关节伸展运动临床测量方法。拟议中的内侧 SOAR 测试在该测试方法的基础上进行了扩展,提供了类似的髋关节功能性内收运动测量方法。这是对内侧SOAR测试作为功能性髋关节内收运动测量方法的内部和内部可靠性和有效性的初步研究:设计:横断面:研究地点:大学运动分析实验室:对 25 名(22 名女性)无症状参与者(平均年龄 = 23.4 岁,SD = 0.8)的 50 个髋关节进行评估:内侧 SOAR 测试中的最大髋关节内收由两名检查员使用标准测角器独立测量。测试还使用了三维运动捕捉技术。使用类内相关系数确定动态关节角度测量的内部和内部可靠性,使用皮尔逊相关性和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析评估通过动态关节角度测量和三维运动捕捉获得的测量结果之间的关系:考官 1 和考官 2 的内部可靠性(ICC2,3)分别为 0.88(95% CI = 0.80-0.92)和 0.87(95% CI = 0.79-0.92)。测量标准误差和最小可检测变化均小于 3.0°。类内相关系数为 0.62(95% CI = 0.28-0.79)。皮尔逊相关性在中低度相关性中具有显著性(r = 0.49,P P = 0.045):结论:与之前报道的后方SOAR测试类似,内侧SOAR测试也表现出了可接受的研究者内部和研究者之间的可靠性,以及与三维运动捕捉的中低度相关性。内侧 SOAR 测试有可能为闭链髋关节内收提供可靠而准确的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of the medial standing overhead arm reach (SOAR) test as a measure of functional hip adduction motion.

Objective: The Posterior Standing Overhead Arm Reach (SOAR) test has been previously reported as a reliable clinical measure of closed chain hip extension motion. The proposed Medial SOAR test expands on that testing approach to provide a similar measure of functional hip adduction motion. This was a preliminary intrarater and interrater reliability and validity study of the Medial SOAR test as a measure of functional hip adduction.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: University motion analysis laboratory.

Participants: Fifty hips were assessed in 25 (22 female) asymptomatic participants (mean age = 23.4 years, SD = 0.8).

Main measures: Maximum hip adduction during the Medial SOAR test was measured with a standard goniometer independently by two examiners. The test was also performed using three-dimensional motion capture. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the goniometric measure was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients, and the relationship between measures obtained via goniometry and three-dimensional motion capture was assessed with Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Intrarater reliability (ICC2,3) was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.92) for Examiner 1 and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79-0.92) for Examiner 2. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were less than 3.0°. Interrater reliability demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.62 (95% CI = 0.28-0.79). Pearson correlations were significant with low-to-moderate associations (r = 0.49, P < 0.001; r = 0.24, P = 0.045).

Conclusions: Similar to the previously reported Posterior SOAR test, the Medial SOAR test demonstrated acceptable intrarater and interrater reliability, along with low-to-moderate associations with three-dimensional motion capture. The Medial SOAR test has the potential to provide a reliable and accurate assessment of closed chain hip adduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信