两种繁殖的北极岸鸟--小杓鹬和红杓鹬--的食物网相互作用受其海拔分布的影响

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
{"title":"两种繁殖的北极岸鸟--小杓鹬和红杓鹬--的食物网相互作用受其海拔分布的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00300-024-03227-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Birds often have to choose their nest site location along a food safety axis, balancing nest predation danger with the food requirements of themselves and their offspring. This is probably most important for precocial species, such as most shorebirds, in which both chicks and parents need access to food resources in the surroundings of the nest, at least during the first days of life of the chicks. In many Arctic ecosystems, shorebird nests are typically prone to predation by both avian and terrestrial predators, especially in lemming-poor years. Among other factors, the strength of the trophic interactions between shorebirds, their prey, and their predators depend on how all of these are distributed across space. During two breeding seasons in northern Taimyr, North-Central Russia, we investigated how the spatial distribution of red knot <em>Calidris canutus</em> and little stint <em>Calidris minuta</em> nests and broods overlaps with the local food landscape and also with the distribution of avian predators and their main prey, lemmings. We found that the two shorebird species use different habitats that vary in arthropod community structure in accordance with the birds’ diet: while little stints selected lower elevations where chironomid midges Chironomidae are more abundant, red knots selected higher elevations where crane flies Tipulidae are more abundant. Furthermore, little stints share low-elevation habitats with lemmings and predators, while red knots inhabit higher elevations averted by both lemmings and avian predators. We found higher nest predation for little stint nests than for red knots nests, especially in a low-lemming year. Our results thus support the idea that food web interactions are driven by landscape and community aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20362,"journal":{"name":"Polar Biology","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food web interactions of two breeding Arctic shorebird species, little stint Calidris minuta and red knot Calidris canutus, are shaped by their elevational distribution\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00300-024-03227-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Birds often have to choose their nest site location along a food safety axis, balancing nest predation danger with the food requirements of themselves and their offspring. This is probably most important for precocial species, such as most shorebirds, in which both chicks and parents need access to food resources in the surroundings of the nest, at least during the first days of life of the chicks. In many Arctic ecosystems, shorebird nests are typically prone to predation by both avian and terrestrial predators, especially in lemming-poor years. Among other factors, the strength of the trophic interactions between shorebirds, their prey, and their predators depend on how all of these are distributed across space. During two breeding seasons in northern Taimyr, North-Central Russia, we investigated how the spatial distribution of red knot <em>Calidris canutus</em> and little stint <em>Calidris minuta</em> nests and broods overlaps with the local food landscape and also with the distribution of avian predators and their main prey, lemmings. We found that the two shorebird species use different habitats that vary in arthropod community structure in accordance with the birds’ diet: while little stints selected lower elevations where chironomid midges Chironomidae are more abundant, red knots selected higher elevations where crane flies Tipulidae are more abundant. Furthermore, little stints share low-elevation habitats with lemmings and predators, while red knots inhabit higher elevations averted by both lemmings and avian predators. We found higher nest predation for little stint nests than for red knots nests, especially in a low-lemming year. Our results thus support the idea that food web interactions are driven by landscape and community aspects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Biology\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-024-03227-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-024-03227-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 鸟类经常需要根据食物安全轴来选择巢址,在巢被捕食的危险和自身及其后代对食物的需求之间取得平衡。这对于大多数海岸鸟类等前社会性物种来说可能最为重要,因为雏鸟和父母都需要获得巢周围的食物资源,至少在雏鸟出生后的最初几天是这样。在许多北极生态系统中,岸鸟巢通常容易遭到鸟类和陆地捕食者的捕食,尤其是在旅鼠稀少的年份。除其他因素外,岸鸟、其猎物和捕食者之间的营养相互作用的强度取决于所有这些因素在空间上的分布情况。在俄罗斯中北部塔伊米尔北部的两个繁殖季节里,我们研究了红喉舌鹬(Calidris canutus)和小杓鹬(Calidris minuta)的巢和育雏空间分布与当地食物景观的重叠情况,以及与鸟类捕食者及其主要猎物旅鼠分布的重叠情况。我们发现,这两种岸鸟使用不同的栖息地,而这些栖息地的节肢动物群落结构也因鸟的食性而异:小杓鹬选择海拔较低的地方,那里摇蚊蠓(Chironomidae)较多,而红节鹬则选择海拔较高的地方,那里鹤蝇(Tipulidae)较多。此外,小短尾雉与旅鼠和捕食者共享低海拔栖息地,而红节雉则栖息在旅鼠和鸟类捕食者都避开的较高海拔地区。我们发现,小短尾鸲巢的捕食率比红节鸲巢的捕食率高,尤其是在旅鼠较少的年份。因此,我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即食物网的相互作用是由景观和群落因素驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food web interactions of two breeding Arctic shorebird species, little stint Calidris minuta and red knot Calidris canutus, are shaped by their elevational distribution

Abstract

Birds often have to choose their nest site location along a food safety axis, balancing nest predation danger with the food requirements of themselves and their offspring. This is probably most important for precocial species, such as most shorebirds, in which both chicks and parents need access to food resources in the surroundings of the nest, at least during the first days of life of the chicks. In many Arctic ecosystems, shorebird nests are typically prone to predation by both avian and terrestrial predators, especially in lemming-poor years. Among other factors, the strength of the trophic interactions between shorebirds, their prey, and their predators depend on how all of these are distributed across space. During two breeding seasons in northern Taimyr, North-Central Russia, we investigated how the spatial distribution of red knot Calidris canutus and little stint Calidris minuta nests and broods overlaps with the local food landscape and also with the distribution of avian predators and their main prey, lemmings. We found that the two shorebird species use different habitats that vary in arthropod community structure in accordance with the birds’ diet: while little stints selected lower elevations where chironomid midges Chironomidae are more abundant, red knots selected higher elevations where crane flies Tipulidae are more abundant. Furthermore, little stints share low-elevation habitats with lemmings and predators, while red knots inhabit higher elevations averted by both lemmings and avian predators. We found higher nest predation for little stint nests than for red knots nests, especially in a low-lemming year. Our results thus support the idea that food web interactions are driven by landscape and community aspects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Biology
Polar Biology 生物-生态学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
116
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Polar Biology publishes Original Papers, Reviews, and Short Notes and is the focal point for biologists working in polar regions. It is also of interest to scientists working in biology in general, ecology and physiology, as well as in oceanography and climatology related to polar life. Polar Biology presents results of studies in plants, animals, and micro-organisms of marine, limnic and terrestrial habitats in polar and subpolar regions of both hemispheres. Taxonomy/ Biogeography Life History Spatio-temporal Patterns in Abundance and Diversity Ecological Interactions Trophic Ecology Ecophysiology/ Biochemistry of Adaptation Biogeochemical Pathways and Cycles Ecological Models Human Impact/ Climate Change/ Conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信