英国医护人员在 COVID-19 期间的调动经历:来自全国性 UK-REACH 研究的数据

Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani S Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek
{"title":"英国医护人员在 COVID-19 期间的调动经历:来自全国性 UK-REACH 研究的数据","authors":"Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani S Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.03.24303615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nIncreasing demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system necessitated redeployment of HCWs outside their routine specialties. Previous studies, highlighting ethnic and occupational inequalities in redeployment, are limited by small cohorts with limited ethnic diversity.\nAims\nTo assess how ethnicity, migration status, and occupation are associated with HCWs redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.\nMethods\nWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study. We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs, including provision of training and supervision, patient contact during redeployment and interaction with COVID-19 patients.\nResults\nOf the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.42, p=0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.49, p=0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p=0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.57, p=0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.66, p=0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.48, p<0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs. Conclusions\nOur findings highlight disparities in HCWs redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequities in healthcare. For future emergencies, redeployment should be contingent upon risk assessments, accompanied by training and supervision tailored to individual HCWs experience and skillset.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redeployment Experiences of Healthcare Workers in the UK during COVID-19: data from the nationwide UK-REACH study\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani S Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.03.24303615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nIncreasing demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system necessitated redeployment of HCWs outside their routine specialties. Previous studies, highlighting ethnic and occupational inequalities in redeployment, are limited by small cohorts with limited ethnic diversity.\\nAims\\nTo assess how ethnicity, migration status, and occupation are associated with HCWs redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.\\nMethods\\nWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study. We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs, including provision of training and supervision, patient contact during redeployment and interaction with COVID-19 patients.\\nResults\\nOf the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.42, p=0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.49, p=0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p=0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.57, p=0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.66, p=0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.48, p<0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs. Conclusions\\nOur findings highlight disparities in HCWs redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequities in healthcare. For future emergencies, redeployment should be contingent upon risk assessments, accompanied by training and supervision tailored to individual HCWs experience and skillset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.03.24303615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.03.24303615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19对医疗保健系统的要求越来越高,因此有必要将医护人员重新部署到其常规专业之外。方法我们利用英国全国范围内的 "医护人员种族与 COVID-19 结果研究"(UK-REACH)队列研究的数据进行了横断面分析。我们使用逻辑回归法研究了种族、移民身份和职业与医护人员重新部署经历的相关性,包括提供培训和监督、重新部署期间与患者的接触以及与 COVID-19 患者的互动。结果在纳入的 10,889 名医护人员中,有 20.4% 的人报告在 2020 年 3 月英国首次全国封锁期间被重新部署。与医务人员相比,从事护理工作的人员被重新部署的可能性更高(比值比 (OR) 1.22,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.04 至 1.42,p=0.009);与在英国出生的人员相比,从事移民工作的人员被重新部署的可能性更高(比值比 1.26,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.06 至 1.49,p=0.01)。与白人同事相比,亚裔医护人员报告接受培训的可能性较低(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.50 至 0.88,p=0.005),黑人医护人员报告接受监督的可能性较高(OR 2.02,95% CI 1.14 至 3.57,p=0.02)。最后,重新部署的黑人(OR 1.33,95% CI 1.07 至 1.66,p=0.009)和亚裔医护人员(OR 1.30,95% CI 1.14 至 1.48,p<0.001)比白人医护人员更有可能报告与 COVID-19 患者进行面对面交流。结论我们的研究结果突显了不同种族、移民和工作角色的医护人员在重新部署经验方面的差异,这可能与医疗保健领域的结构性不平等有关。在未来的紧急情况下,重新部署应取决于风险评估,同时还应根据医护人员的经验和技能进行培训和监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redeployment Experiences of Healthcare Workers in the UK during COVID-19: data from the nationwide UK-REACH study
Background Increasing demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system necessitated redeployment of HCWs outside their routine specialties. Previous studies, highlighting ethnic and occupational inequalities in redeployment, are limited by small cohorts with limited ethnic diversity. Aims To assess how ethnicity, migration status, and occupation are associated with HCWs redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study. We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs, including provision of training and supervision, patient contact during redeployment and interaction with COVID-19 patients. Results Of the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.42, p=0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.49, p=0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p=0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.57, p=0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.66, p=0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.48, p<0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs. Conclusions Our findings highlight disparities in HCWs redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequities in healthcare. For future emergencies, redeployment should be contingent upon risk assessments, accompanied by training and supervision tailored to individual HCWs experience and skillset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信