同行评审是否已经成熟，可以进行修改并重新提交？- 学术界可能不是回答这个问题的一方

IF 1 2区历史学 Q4 BUSINESS

Business History Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1080/00076791.2024.2318464

Dirk Lindebaum

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇短文是对 Lubinski、Decker 和 MacKenzie（本期）社论的回应，作者在社论中强调了科学同行评审的必要性，但也对其进行了仔细的审查。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is peer review ripe for a revise and resubmit? – Academics might be less the party answering that question

This is a short essay in response to the editorial by Lubinski, Decker, and MacKenzie (this issue), in which the authors emphasise the need for scientific peer-review, but also scrutinise it for it...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Business History Multiple-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Business History is an international journal concerned with the long-run evolution and contemporary operation of business systems and enterprises. Its primary purpose is to make available the findings of advanced research, empirical and conceptual, into matters of global significance, such as corporate organization and growth, multinational enterprise, business efficiency, entrepreneurship, technological change, finance, marketing, human resource management, professionalization and business culture. The journal has won a reputation for academic excellence and has a wide readership amongst management specialists, economists and other social scientists and economic, social, labour and business historians.