回收的阿波罗 F-1 发动机涡轮叶片的冶金分析与保存

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2303891

Adam Creuziger, Claudia Chemello, Paul Mardikian, Jerrad Alexander

引用次数: 0

摘要

对从阿波罗土星五号火箭 F-1 发动机上回收的涡轮叶片进行了检查，以确定适当的保护方案。在涡轮叶片上观察到了严重的腐蚀损坏...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Metallurgical Analysis and Conservation of Turbine Blades from Recovered Apollo F-1 Engines

Turbine blades recovered from the Apollo Saturn V rocket F-1 engines were examined to determine an appropriate conservation protocol. Significant corrosion damage was observed in the turbine blades...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.