Mehraneh D. Jafari , Andrea Mesiti , Julianna Brouwer , Chelsea McKinney , Lari B. Wenzel , Alessio Pigazzi , Jason A. Zell
{"title":"医生和患者对结肠癌术中即时化疗的态度","authors":"Mehraneh D. Jafari , Andrea Mesiti , Julianna Brouwer , Chelsea McKinney , Lari B. Wenzel , Alessio Pigazzi , Jason A. Zell","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients’ and providers’ responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (<em>p</em> = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (<em>p</em> < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (<em>p</em> = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (<em>p</em> = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (<em>p</em> = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (<em>p</em> = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (<em>p</em> = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108/pdfft?md5=8ca70afb2272b954ac368cf708081f3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer\",\"authors\":\"Mehraneh D. Jafari , Andrea Mesiti , Julianna Brouwer , Chelsea McKinney , Lari B. Wenzel , Alessio Pigazzi , Jason A. Zell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients’ and providers’ responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (<em>p</em> = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (<em>p</em> < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (<em>p</em> = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (<em>p</em> = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (<em>p</em> = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (<em>p</em> = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (<em>p</em> = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108/pdfft?md5=8ca70afb2272b954ac368cf708081f3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000108-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer
Introduction
We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.
Methods
Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients’ and providers’ responses.
Results
Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (p = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (p < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (p = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (p = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (p = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (p = 0.003).
Conclusions
We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.