2011-20 年,医疗保险 D 部分计划大幅提高了对处方药的使用限制。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Geoffrey Joyce, Barbara Blaylock, Jiafan Chen, Karen Van Nuys
{"title":"2011-20 年,医疗保险 D 部分计划大幅提高了对处方药的使用限制。","authors":"Geoffrey Joyce, Barbara Blaylock, Jiafan Chen, Karen Van Nuys","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug utilization management tools can be employed to ensure that medicines are prescribed cost-effectively, but they can also be implemented in ways that reduce adherence and harm patient health. We examined trends in the prevalence of utilization restrictions on non-protected-class compounds in Medicare Part D plans during the period 2011-20, including prior authorization and step therapy requirements as well as formulary exclusions. Part D plans became significantly more restrictive over time, rising from an average of 31.9 percent of compounds restricted in 2011 to 44.4 percent restricted in 2020. The prevalence of formulary exclusions grew particularly fast: By 2020, plan formularies excluded an average of 44.7 percent of brand-name-only compounds. Formulary restrictions were more common among brand-name-only compared with generic-available compounds, among more expensive compounds, and in stand-alone compared with Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50411,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs","volume":"43 3","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare Part D Plans Greatly Increased Utilization Restrictions On Prescription Drugs, 2011-20.\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Joyce, Barbara Blaylock, Jiafan Chen, Karen Van Nuys\",\"doi\":\"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug utilization management tools can be employed to ensure that medicines are prescribed cost-effectively, but they can also be implemented in ways that reduce adherence and harm patient health. We examined trends in the prevalence of utilization restrictions on non-protected-class compounds in Medicare Part D plans during the period 2011-20, including prior authorization and step therapy requirements as well as formulary exclusions. Part D plans became significantly more restrictive over time, rising from an average of 31.9 percent of compounds restricted in 2011 to 44.4 percent restricted in 2020. The prevalence of formulary exclusions grew particularly fast: By 2020, plan formularies excluded an average of 44.7 percent of brand-name-only compounds. Formulary restrictions were more common among brand-name-only compared with generic-available compounds, among more expensive compounds, and in stand-alone compared with Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"391-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00999\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物使用管理工具可用于确保处方药具有成本效益,但其实施方式也可能降低依从性并损害患者健康。我们研究了 2011-20 年间医疗保险 D 部分计划中对非保护类复方药物使用限制的流行趋势,包括事先授权和阶梯治疗要求以及处方排除。随着时间的推移,D 部分计划的限制性明显增加,从 2011 年平均 31.9% 的化合物受限增加到 2020 年的 44.4%。处方排除的普遍性增长尤为迅速:到 2020 年,计划处方中平均有 44.7% 的纯品牌化合物被排除在外。与可获得仿制药的复方制剂相比,处方集限制在纯品牌复方制剂中更为常见,在更昂贵的复方制剂中更为常见,在独立处方药计划中也比在医疗保险优势处方药计划中更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicare Part D Plans Greatly Increased Utilization Restrictions On Prescription Drugs, 2011-20.

Drug utilization management tools can be employed to ensure that medicines are prescribed cost-effectively, but they can also be implemented in ways that reduce adherence and harm patient health. We examined trends in the prevalence of utilization restrictions on non-protected-class compounds in Medicare Part D plans during the period 2011-20, including prior authorization and step therapy requirements as well as formulary exclusions. Part D plans became significantly more restrictive over time, rising from an average of 31.9 percent of compounds restricted in 2011 to 44.4 percent restricted in 2020. The prevalence of formulary exclusions grew particularly fast: By 2020, plan formularies excluded an average of 44.7 percent of brand-name-only compounds. Formulary restrictions were more common among brand-name-only compared with generic-available compounds, among more expensive compounds, and in stand-alone compared with Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Affairs
Health Affairs 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Affairs is a prestigious journal that aims to thoroughly examine significant health policy matters both domestically and globally. Our publication is committed to addressing issues that are relevant to both the private and public sectors. We are enthusiastic about inviting private and public decision-makers to contribute their innovative ideas in a publishable format. Health Affairs seeks to incorporate various perspectives from industry, labor, government, and academia, ensuring that our readers benefit from the diverse viewpoints within the healthcare field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信