Mirette Dubé, Jessica Martel, Jason Kumagai, Michael Suddes, Janice Cullen, Jason Laberge
{"title":"应用人为因素和系统仿真方法为价值数百万美元的医疗保健决策提供信息。","authors":"Mirette Dubé, Jessica Martel, Jason Kumagai, Michael Suddes, Janice Cullen, Jason Laberge","doi":"10.1177/19375867241229078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article describes a case study of a collaborative human factors (HF) and systems-focused simulation (SFS) project to evaluate potential patient and staff safety risks associated with a multimillion-dollar design and construction decision.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined integration of HF and SFS methods in healthcare related to testing and informing the design of new environments and processes is underutilized. Few realize the effectiveness of this integration in healthcare to reduce risk and improve decision-making, safety, design, efficiency, patient experience, and outcomes. This project showcases how the combined use of HF and SFS methods can provide objective evidence to help inform decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project was initiated by a healthcare executive team looking for an objective, user informed analysis of a current connector passageway between two existing buildings. The goal was to understand the implications of keeping the current route for simultaneous use for public and patients service flow versus building and financing a new passageway for separate flow and transport. An interprofessional team of intensive care unit professionals participated in two simulations designed to test the current connector. A failure mode and effects analysis and qualitative debrief feedback was used to evaluate risks and potential failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation resulted in data that enabled informed executive decision making for the most effective, efficient, and safest option for public, staff, and patient transport between two buildings. This evaluation resulted in the decision to go forward with building a multimillion-dollar new connector passageway to improve integrated care and transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"209-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Human Factors and Systems Simulation Methods to Inform a Multimillion-Dollar Healthcare Decision.\",\"authors\":\"Mirette Dubé, Jessica Martel, Jason Kumagai, Michael Suddes, Janice Cullen, Jason Laberge\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867241229078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article describes a case study of a collaborative human factors (HF) and systems-focused simulation (SFS) project to evaluate potential patient and staff safety risks associated with a multimillion-dollar design and construction decision.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined integration of HF and SFS methods in healthcare related to testing and informing the design of new environments and processes is underutilized. Few realize the effectiveness of this integration in healthcare to reduce risk and improve decision-making, safety, design, efficiency, patient experience, and outcomes. This project showcases how the combined use of HF and SFS methods can provide objective evidence to help inform decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project was initiated by a healthcare executive team looking for an objective, user informed analysis of a current connector passageway between two existing buildings. The goal was to understand the implications of keeping the current route for simultaneous use for public and patients service flow versus building and financing a new passageway for separate flow and transport. An interprofessional team of intensive care unit professionals participated in two simulations designed to test the current connector. A failure mode and effects analysis and qualitative debrief feedback was used to evaluate risks and potential failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation resulted in data that enabled informed executive decision making for the most effective, efficient, and safest option for public, staff, and patient transport between two buildings. This evaluation resulted in the decision to go forward with building a multimillion-dollar new connector passageway to improve integrated care and transport.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"209-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241229078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241229078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applying Human Factors and Systems Simulation Methods to Inform a Multimillion-Dollar Healthcare Decision.
Purpose: This article describes a case study of a collaborative human factors (HF) and systems-focused simulation (SFS) project to evaluate potential patient and staff safety risks associated with a multimillion-dollar design and construction decision.
Background: The combined integration of HF and SFS methods in healthcare related to testing and informing the design of new environments and processes is underutilized. Few realize the effectiveness of this integration in healthcare to reduce risk and improve decision-making, safety, design, efficiency, patient experience, and outcomes. This project showcases how the combined use of HF and SFS methods can provide objective evidence to help inform decisions.
Methods: The project was initiated by a healthcare executive team looking for an objective, user informed analysis of a current connector passageway between two existing buildings. The goal was to understand the implications of keeping the current route for simultaneous use for public and patients service flow versus building and financing a new passageway for separate flow and transport. An interprofessional team of intensive care unit professionals participated in two simulations designed to test the current connector. A failure mode and effects analysis and qualitative debrief feedback was used to evaluate risks and potential failures.
Results: The evaluation resulted in data that enabled informed executive decision making for the most effective, efficient, and safest option for public, staff, and patient transport between two buildings. This evaluation resulted in the decision to go forward with building a multimillion-dollar new connector passageway to improve integrated care and transport.