麻醉剂选择对经颅运动电位诱发口腔创伤发生率的影响。

Q3 Health Professions
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.1080/21646821.2024.2319508
Marcia-Ruth Ndege, Anthony Clanton, Tammy Lacy, Adam Doan
{"title":"麻醉剂选择对经颅运动电位诱发口腔创伤发生率的影响。","authors":"Marcia-Ruth Ndege, Anthony Clanton, Tammy Lacy, Adam Doan","doi":"10.1080/21646821.2024.2319508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22816,"journal":{"name":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Anesthetic Choice on the Incidence of Transcranial-Motor Potential-Induced Oral Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Marcia-Ruth Ndege, Anthony Clanton, Tammy Lacy, Adam Doan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21646821.2024.2319508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Neurodiagnostic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2024.2319508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2024.2319508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅运动诱发电位(TcMEPs)在评估运动功能有风险的外科手术中的运动束功能方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。然而,经颅刺激会造成口腔创伤的风险。有几项研究报告了影响 TcMEP 引起口腔创伤率的不同因素,但对麻醉方案如何影响这一比率却知之甚少。在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了 2019 年至 2021 年期间 66,166 个病例在全静脉麻醉(TIVA)和平衡麻醉下的口腔损伤发生率。我们的样本中有 295 例口腔损伤,发生率为 0.45%,与文献报道的范围一致。受伤患者中共有 222 人使用了平衡麻醉镇静剂,其余 73 人使用了 TIVA 麻醉剂。这种分布差异在统计学上有显著意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Anesthetic Choice on the Incidence of Transcranial-Motor Potential-Induced Oral Trauma.

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Neurodiagnostic Journal
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Neurodiagnostic Journal is the official journal of ASET - The Neurodiagnostic Society. It serves as an educational resource for Neurodiagnostic professionals, a vehicle for introducing new techniques and innovative technologies in the field, patient safety and advocacy, and an avenue for sharing best practices within the Neurodiagnostic Technology profession. The journal features original articles about electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), nerve conduction (NC), polysomnography (PSG), autonomic testing, and long-term monitoring (LTM) in the intensive care (ICU) and epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). Subject matter also includes education, training, lab management, legislative and licensure needs, guidelines for standards of care, and the impact of our profession in healthcare and society. The journal seeks to foster ideas, commentary, and news from technologists, physicians, clinicians, managers/leaders, and professional organizations, and to introduce trends and the latest developments in the field of neurodiagnostics. Media reviews, case studies, ASET Annual Conference proceedings, review articles, and quizzes for ASET-CEUs are also published in The Neurodiagnostic Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信