双语法定解释与英国：国内法和国际经验

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1093/slr/hmae014

Catrin Fflûr Huws

{"title":"双语法定解释与英国：国内法和国际经验","authors":"Catrin Fflûr Huws","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the emerging need for bilingual statutory interpretation within the United Kingdom and explains the significance of the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments in R (on behalf of Driver) v Rhondda Cynon Tâf County Borough Council both in terms of the process of statutory interpretation and with regard to its potential impact on the future of England and Wales as a unified jurisdiction. It draws upon the UK’s approaches to multilingual obligations under international law, and on comparative experiences of multilingualism within a domestic legal system.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilingual Statutory Interpretation and the United Kingdom: Domestic Law and International Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Catrin Fflûr Huws\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/slr/hmae014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the emerging need for bilingual statutory interpretation within the United Kingdom and explains the significance of the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments in R (on behalf of Driver) v Rhondda Cynon Tâf County Borough Council both in terms of the process of statutory interpretation and with regard to its potential impact on the future of England and Wales as a unified jurisdiction. It draws upon the UK’s approaches to multilingual obligations under international law, and on comparative experiences of multilingualism within a domestic legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了英国对双语法定解释的新需求，并解释了高等法院和上诉法院在 R（代表 Driver）诉 Rhondda Cynon Tâf 郡议会一案中的判决在法定解释程序及其对英格兰和威尔士作为统一司法管辖区的未来的潜在影响方面的意义。它借鉴了英国对国际法规定的多语言义务的处理方法，以及在国内法律体系中使用多种语言的比较经验。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bilingual Statutory Interpretation and the United Kingdom: Domestic Law and International Experiences

This article explores the emerging need for bilingual statutory interpretation within the United Kingdom and explains the significance of the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments in R (on behalf of Driver) v Rhondda Cynon Tâf County Borough Council both in terms of the process of statutory interpretation and with regard to its potential impact on the future of England and Wales as a unified jurisdiction. It draws upon the UK’s approaches to multilingual obligations under international law, and on comparative experiences of multilingualism within a domestic legal system.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Statute Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.