司法委员会作为第四分支机构的理由

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1017/s1574019624000038

David Kosař, Katarína Šipulová, Ondřej Kadlec

引用次数: 0

摘要

司法委员会--三权分立--第四分支机构--司法独立--司法委员会的四种理想类型--法官控制型、政治家控制型、跨分支机构型和第四分支机构型司法委员会--司法机构政治化和公司化的危险

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Case for Judicial Councils as Fourth-Branch Institutions

Judicial councils – separation of powers – fourth-branch institutions – judicial independence – four ideal types of judicial councils – a judge-controlled, politician-controlled, inter-branch and fourth-branch judicial council – danger of politicisation and corporativism of the judiciary

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.