正式和非正式的家庭正念练习数量与疗效相关吗?为期四周的慢性疼痛管理正念干预试点研究结果。

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-02-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241236775
Carrie E Brintz, Geneva Polser, Rogelio A Coronado, Benjamin French, Keturah R Faurot, Susan A Gaylord
{"title":"正式和非正式的家庭正念练习数量与疗效相关吗?为期四周的慢性疼痛管理正念干预试点研究结果。","authors":"Carrie E Brintz, Geneva Polser, Rogelio A Coronado, Benjamin French, Keturah R Faurot, Susan A Gaylord","doi":"10.1177/27536130241236775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between home mindfulness practice quantity in standard length mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and chronic pain outcomes is variable. Few studies focus on abbreviated MBIs (< 8 weeks) and distinguish between formal guided practices and informal practices in daily life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize home mindfulness practice and explore associations between home practice quantity and pre-to-post-outcome changes after an MBI for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-arm study, 21 adults with chronic pain (mean age = 54 years, 81% White, mean pain duration = 7 years) completed an MBI with four weekly group sessions. Pre and post self-report measures of pain intensity/interference, physical function, depression, anxiety, positive affect, sleep disturbance (all PROMIS measures), and pain acceptance, catastrophizing, perceived stress and mindfulness were completed, along with daily surveys of formal (mindfulness of breath, body scan) and informal (breathing space, mindfulness of daily activities) practice. Bivariate correlations and multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between days and minutes of practice and change in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, formal practice was completed on 4.3 days per week and 13.5 minutes per day. Informal practice was completed on 3.5 days per week and 8.6 minutes per day. Formal practice was not significantly correlated with outcomes (Spearman's ρ = |.01|-|.32|), whereas informal practice was correlated with multiple outcomes (ρ = |.04|-|.66|). Number of days practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and catastrophizing (<i>p</i>'s ≤ .05). Number of minutes practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, anxiety, positive affect, and catastrophizing (<i>p</i>'s ≤ .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informal home practice quantity, but not formal practice quantity, is associated with improved outcomes during an abbreviated MBI for chronic pain. For these MBIs, it is important to evaluate the distinct roles of formal and informal practice.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrialsgov registration: </strong>NCT03495856.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Formal and Informal Home Mindfulness Practice Quantities Associated With Outcomes? Results From a Pilot Study of a Four-Week Mindfulness Intervention for Chronic Pain Management.\",\"authors\":\"Carrie E Brintz, Geneva Polser, Rogelio A Coronado, Benjamin French, Keturah R Faurot, Susan A Gaylord\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536130241236775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between home mindfulness practice quantity in standard length mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and chronic pain outcomes is variable. Few studies focus on abbreviated MBIs (< 8 weeks) and distinguish between formal guided practices and informal practices in daily life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize home mindfulness practice and explore associations between home practice quantity and pre-to-post-outcome changes after an MBI for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-arm study, 21 adults with chronic pain (mean age = 54 years, 81% White, mean pain duration = 7 years) completed an MBI with four weekly group sessions. Pre and post self-report measures of pain intensity/interference, physical function, depression, anxiety, positive affect, sleep disturbance (all PROMIS measures), and pain acceptance, catastrophizing, perceived stress and mindfulness were completed, along with daily surveys of formal (mindfulness of breath, body scan) and informal (breathing space, mindfulness of daily activities) practice. Bivariate correlations and multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between days and minutes of practice and change in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, formal practice was completed on 4.3 days per week and 13.5 minutes per day. Informal practice was completed on 3.5 days per week and 8.6 minutes per day. Formal practice was not significantly correlated with outcomes (Spearman's ρ = |.01|-|.32|), whereas informal practice was correlated with multiple outcomes (ρ = |.04|-|.66|). Number of days practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and catastrophizing (<i>p</i>'s ≤ .05). Number of minutes practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, anxiety, positive affect, and catastrophizing (<i>p</i>'s ≤ .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informal home practice quantity, but not formal practice quantity, is associated with improved outcomes during an abbreviated MBI for chronic pain. For these MBIs, it is important to evaluate the distinct roles of formal and informal practice.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrialsgov registration: </strong>NCT03495856.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10906052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241236775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241236775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在标准长度的正念干预(MBIs)中,居家正念练习的数量与慢性疼痛结果之间的关系不尽相同。很少有研究关注简短的正念干预(小于8周),也很少有研究区分正式的指导性练习和日常生活中的非正式练习:目的:描述居家正念练习的特点,并探索居家正念练习的数量与MBI治疗慢性疼痛后的前后结果变化之间的关联:在这项单臂研究中,21 名患有慢性疼痛的成年人(平均年龄为 54 岁,81% 为白人,平均疼痛持续时间为 7 年)完成了每周四节小组课程的 MBI。研究人员完成了对疼痛强度/干扰、身体功能、抑郁、焦虑、积极情绪、睡眠障碍(所有 PROMIS 测量)、疼痛接受度、灾难化、感知压力和正念的前后自我报告测量,以及对正式(正念呼吸、身体扫描)和非正式(呼吸空间、正念日常活动)练习的日常调查。双变量相关性和多变量回归模型用于评估练习天数和分钟数与结果变化之间的关联:结果:平均每周有 4.3 天完成正式练习,每天练习 13.5 分钟。非正式练习每周完成 3.5 天,每天 8.6 分钟。正式练习与结果无明显相关性(Spearman's ρ = |.01|-|.32|),而非正式练习与多种结果相关(ρ = |.04|-|.66|)。非正式练习的天数与疼痛干扰、身体功能、睡眠障碍和灾难化的改善相关(P's ≤ .05)。非正式练习的分钟数与疼痛干扰、焦虑、积极情绪和灾难化的改善有关(P's ≤ .05):结论:在针对慢性疼痛的简短 MBI 中,家庭非正式练习的数量(而非正式练习的数量)与治疗效果的改善有关。对于这些 MBI,评估正式和非正式练习的不同作用非常重要:NCT03495856。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Formal and Informal Home Mindfulness Practice Quantities Associated With Outcomes? Results From a Pilot Study of a Four-Week Mindfulness Intervention for Chronic Pain Management.

Background: The association between home mindfulness practice quantity in standard length mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) and chronic pain outcomes is variable. Few studies focus on abbreviated MBIs (< 8 weeks) and distinguish between formal guided practices and informal practices in daily life.

Objectives: To characterize home mindfulness practice and explore associations between home practice quantity and pre-to-post-outcome changes after an MBI for chronic pain.

Methods: In this single-arm study, 21 adults with chronic pain (mean age = 54 years, 81% White, mean pain duration = 7 years) completed an MBI with four weekly group sessions. Pre and post self-report measures of pain intensity/interference, physical function, depression, anxiety, positive affect, sleep disturbance (all PROMIS measures), and pain acceptance, catastrophizing, perceived stress and mindfulness were completed, along with daily surveys of formal (mindfulness of breath, body scan) and informal (breathing space, mindfulness of daily activities) practice. Bivariate correlations and multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between days and minutes of practice and change in outcomes.

Results: On average, formal practice was completed on 4.3 days per week and 13.5 minutes per day. Informal practice was completed on 3.5 days per week and 8.6 minutes per day. Formal practice was not significantly correlated with outcomes (Spearman's ρ = |.01|-|.32|), whereas informal practice was correlated with multiple outcomes (ρ = |.04|-|.66|). Number of days practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and catastrophizing (p's ≤ .05). Number of minutes practiced informally was associated with improved pain interference, anxiety, positive affect, and catastrophizing (p's ≤ .05).

Conclusion: Informal home practice quantity, but not formal practice quantity, is associated with improved outcomes during an abbreviated MBI for chronic pain. For these MBIs, it is important to evaluate the distinct roles of formal and informal practice.

Clinicaltrialsgov registration: NCT03495856.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信