非隐静脉氰基丙烯酸酯栓塞术的伦理考虑和不良事件:病例报告。

IF 0.8 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Insoo Park
{"title":"非隐静脉氰基丙烯酸酯栓塞术的伦理考虑和不良事件:病例报告。","authors":"Insoo Park","doi":"10.5758/vsi.230102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) technique for chronic venous disease treatment is less painful and leads to a faster recovery than conventional endovenous thermal treatment. According to the instructions for use (IFU) of the VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic), a representative CAE product, it has only been approved for treating saphenous veins, not non-saphenous veins. Here, we report a case of ignoring the VenaSeal IFU for treating testicular pain using CAE for non-saphenous veins within the abdominal wall, which is a baseless and non-scientific approach nearing malpractice. Hence, it is imperative for physicians to rigorously adhere to the IFU and abstain from experimenting with new treatment methods solely based on personal experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":52311,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Specialist International","volume":"40 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Considerations and Adverse Events in Cyanoacrylate Embolization for Non-Saphenous Veins: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Insoo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5758/vsi.230102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) technique for chronic venous disease treatment is less painful and leads to a faster recovery than conventional endovenous thermal treatment. According to the instructions for use (IFU) of the VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic), a representative CAE product, it has only been approved for treating saphenous veins, not non-saphenous veins. Here, we report a case of ignoring the VenaSeal IFU for treating testicular pain using CAE for non-saphenous veins within the abdominal wall, which is a baseless and non-scientific approach nearing malpractice. Hence, it is imperative for physicians to rigorously adhere to the IFU and abstain from experimenting with new treatment methods solely based on personal experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Specialist International\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Specialist International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.230102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Specialist International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.230102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与传统的静脉腔内热疗相比,用于治疗慢性静脉疾病的氰基丙烯酸酯栓塞(CAE)技术痛苦更小,恢复更快。根据 CAE 的代表产品 VenaSeal 封闭系统(美敦力公司)的使用说明(IFU),该产品仅获准用于治疗隐静脉,而非非隐静脉。在此,我们报告了一例无视 VenaSeal IFU 用于治疗睾丸疼痛的病例,使用 CAE 治疗腹壁内的非隐静脉,这种毫无根据、不科学的做法近乎渎职。因此,医生必须严格遵守 IFU,避免仅凭个人经验尝试新的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Considerations and Adverse Events in Cyanoacrylate Embolization for Non-Saphenous Veins: A Case Report.

The cyanoacrylate embolization (CAE) technique for chronic venous disease treatment is less painful and leads to a faster recovery than conventional endovenous thermal treatment. According to the instructions for use (IFU) of the VenaSeal closure system (Medtronic), a representative CAE product, it has only been approved for treating saphenous veins, not non-saphenous veins. Here, we report a case of ignoring the VenaSeal IFU for treating testicular pain using CAE for non-saphenous veins within the abdominal wall, which is a baseless and non-scientific approach nearing malpractice. Hence, it is imperative for physicians to rigorously adhere to the IFU and abstain from experimenting with new treatment methods solely based on personal experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信