对慢性病成人的家庭照顾者使用生态瞬间评估:系统综述。

IF 2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.93907
Areum Han, Laurie A Malone, Hee Yun Lee, Jiaqi Gong, Ryan Henry, Xishi Zhu, Hon K Yuen
{"title":"对慢性病成人的家庭照顾者使用生态瞬间评估:系统综述。","authors":"Areum Han, Laurie A Malone, Hee Yun Lee, Jiaqi Gong, Ryan Henry, Xishi Zhu, Hon K Yuen","doi":"10.52965/001c.93907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a real-time data collection method can provide insight into the daily experiences of family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted within six databases for articles published from the inception of the database through September 2023. We extracted the characteristics of the included studies and data on EMA-specific methods to determine the quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions were identified, with almost all studies focused on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's or dementia-related conditions. The average compliance rate across the included studies was 75%, below the recommended rate. In addition, most of the included studies did not collect the family caregivers' daily activities and care contexts in their responses (i.e., affect, stress, well-being, care demand, and fatigue) to the EMA prompts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review showed that using EMA to collect information on family caregivers of adults with chronic health conditions appeared feasible and acceptable. However, the methodology or design of using EMA to collect caregiver information in this population is still preliminary. The limited number of existing studies that have used EMA to capture the daily experiences of family caregivers does not provide key information that could improve understanding of caregivers' emotional experiences and well-being in real-life situations. We identified gaps in the literature that warrant additional EMA studies for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51865,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"93907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of ecological momentary assessment for family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Areum Han, Laurie A Malone, Hee Yun Lee, Jiaqi Gong, Ryan Henry, Xishi Zhu, Hon K Yuen\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.93907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a real-time data collection method can provide insight into the daily experiences of family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted within six databases for articles published from the inception of the database through September 2023. We extracted the characteristics of the included studies and data on EMA-specific methods to determine the quality of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions were identified, with almost all studies focused on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's or dementia-related conditions. The average compliance rate across the included studies was 75%, below the recommended rate. In addition, most of the included studies did not collect the family caregivers' daily activities and care contexts in their responses (i.e., affect, stress, well-being, care demand, and fatigue) to the EMA prompts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review showed that using EMA to collect information on family caregivers of adults with chronic health conditions appeared feasible and acceptable. However, the methodology or design of using EMA to collect caregiver information in this population is still preliminary. The limited number of existing studies that have used EMA to capture the daily experiences of family caregivers does not provide key information that could improve understanding of caregivers' emotional experiences and well-being in real-life situations. We identified gaps in the literature that warrant additional EMA studies for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"93907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.93907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.93907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生态瞬间评估(EMA)作为一种实时数据收集方法,可以让人们深入了解家庭照顾者的日常经历。目的:本系统性综述旨在对涉及慢性病成人家庭照顾者完成的生态瞬间评估的研究进行综述:我们在六个数据库中对从数据库建立之初到 2023 年 9 月期间发表的文章进行了系统检索。我们提取了所纳入研究的特征和 EMA 特定方法的数据,以确定所纳入研究的质量:共发现了 12 项涉及慢性病成人家庭照顾者完成 EMA 的研究,几乎所有的研究都侧重于阿尔茨海默氏症或痴呆症相关疾病患者的照顾者。所纳入研究的平均达标率为 75%,低于建议达标率。此外,所纳入的大多数研究都没有收集家庭照顾者对 EMA 提示的反应(即情感、压力、幸福感、照顾需求和疲劳)中的日常活动和照顾背景:本综述显示,使用 EMA 收集慢性病成人家庭照顾者的信息似乎是可行且可接受的。然而,在这一人群中使用 EMA 收集照顾者信息的方法或设计仍是初步的。使用 EMA 收集家庭照顾者日常经历的现有研究数量有限,无法提供关键信息,从而无法更好地了解照顾者在现实生活中的情感经历和幸福感。我们发现了文献中的不足之处,需要针对这一人群开展更多的 EMA 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of ecological momentary assessment for family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review.

Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a real-time data collection method can provide insight into the daily experiences of family caregivers.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted within six databases for articles published from the inception of the database through September 2023. We extracted the characteristics of the included studies and data on EMA-specific methods to determine the quality of the included studies.

Results: A total of 12 studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions were identified, with almost all studies focused on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's or dementia-related conditions. The average compliance rate across the included studies was 75%, below the recommended rate. In addition, most of the included studies did not collect the family caregivers' daily activities and care contexts in their responses (i.e., affect, stress, well-being, care demand, and fatigue) to the EMA prompts.

Discussion: This review showed that using EMA to collect information on family caregivers of adults with chronic health conditions appeared feasible and acceptable. However, the methodology or design of using EMA to collect caregiver information in this population is still preliminary. The limited number of existing studies that have used EMA to capture the daily experiences of family caregivers does not provide key information that could improve understanding of caregivers' emotional experiences and well-being in real-life situations. We identified gaps in the literature that warrant additional EMA studies for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Research
Health Psychology Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信