护士对住院病人自我管理的支持概念化--一项经过修改的德尔菲研究》。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-03 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17066
Caroline E M Otter, Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel, Joost C Keers, Jakobus Smit, Lisette Schoonhoven
{"title":"护士对住院病人自我管理的支持概念化--一项经过修改的德尔菲研究》。","authors":"Caroline E M Otter, Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel, Joost C Keers, Jakobus Smit, Lisette Schoonhoven","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine patients', nurses' and researchers' opinions on the appropriateness and completeness of the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-round Delphi survey. The panel group consisted of patients, nurses and researchers. The conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management presented in the first Delphi round was based on previous research, including a scoping review of the literature. Data was analysed between both rounds and after the second round. Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first round all activities of the proposed conceptualization were considered appropriate to support the patients' self-management. Panel members' comments led to the textual adjustment of 19 activities, the development of 15 new activities, and three general questions related to self-management support during hospitalisation. In the second round the modified and the newly added activities were also deemed appropriate. The clarification statements raised in the first Delphi round were accepted, although questions remained about the wording of the activities and about what is and what is not self-management support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After textual adjustments and the addition of some activities, the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support in patients' self-management while hospitalised have been considered appropriate and complete. Nevertheless, questions about the scope of this concept still remains. The results provide a starting point for further discussion and the development of self-management programs aimed at the hospitalised patient.</p><p><strong>Implication for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The results can be considered as a starting point for practice to discuss the concept of nurses' support for hospitalised patients' self-management and develop, implement and research self-management programs specific for their patient population.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved as expert panellist in this Delphi study. Impact statement What problem did the study address? Self-management support during hospitalisation is understudied, which undermines the development of evidence-based interventions. What were the main findings? A panel, consisting of patients, nurses and researchers, agreed on the appropriateness of a conceptualization of nurses' support of inpatients' self-management, and identified some points for discussion, mainly related to the boundaries of the concept self-management. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study is crucial for generating conceptual understanding of how nurses support patients' self-management during hospitalisation. This is necessary for policy, clinical practice, education, and research on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline E M Otter, Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel, Joost C Keers, Jakobus Smit, Lisette Schoonhoven\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine patients', nurses' and researchers' opinions on the appropriateness and completeness of the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-round Delphi survey. The panel group consisted of patients, nurses and researchers. The conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management presented in the first Delphi round was based on previous research, including a scoping review of the literature. Data was analysed between both rounds and after the second round. Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first round all activities of the proposed conceptualization were considered appropriate to support the patients' self-management. Panel members' comments led to the textual adjustment of 19 activities, the development of 15 new activities, and three general questions related to self-management support during hospitalisation. In the second round the modified and the newly added activities were also deemed appropriate. The clarification statements raised in the first Delphi round were accepted, although questions remained about the wording of the activities and about what is and what is not self-management support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After textual adjustments and the addition of some activities, the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support in patients' self-management while hospitalised have been considered appropriate and complete. Nevertheless, questions about the scope of this concept still remains. The results provide a starting point for further discussion and the development of self-management programs aimed at the hospitalised patient.</p><p><strong>Implication for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The results can be considered as a starting point for practice to discuss the concept of nurses' support for hospitalised patients' self-management and develop, implement and research self-management programs specific for their patient population.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved as expert panellist in this Delphi study. Impact statement What problem did the study address? Self-management support during hospitalisation is understudied, which undermines the development of evidence-based interventions. What were the main findings? A panel, consisting of patients, nurses and researchers, agreed on the appropriateness of a conceptualization of nurses' support of inpatients' self-management, and identified some points for discussion, mainly related to the boundaries of the concept self-management. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study is crucial for generating conceptual understanding of how nurses support patients' self-management during hospitalisation. This is necessary for policy, clinical practice, education, and research on this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定病人、护士和研究人员对护士支持住院病人自我管理的拟议概念的适当性和完整性的意见:改良德尔菲研究:我们进行了两轮德尔菲调查。小组成员包括患者、护士和研究人员。第一轮德尔菲调查中提出的护士对住院患者自我管理的支持概念是基于之前的研究,包括对文献的范围界定。在两轮讨论之间和第二轮讨论之后对数据进行了分析。结果按照德尔菲研究的开展和报告指南(CREDES)进行报告:结果:在第一轮研究中,建议概念化的所有活动都被认为适合支持患者的自我管理。小组成员的意见导致对 19 项活动的文字进行了调整,开发了 15 项新活动,并提出了 3 个与住院期间自我管理支持相关的一般性问题。在第二轮讨论中,修改过的活动和新增加的活动也被认为是合适的。第一轮德尔菲讨论中提出的澄清声明得到了接受,但对活动的措辞以及什么是自我管理支持、什么不是自我管理支持仍有疑问:在对文字进行调整并增加了一些活动之后,我们认为护士在患者住院期间为其自我管理提供支持的概念化建议是恰当和完整的。然而,关于这一概念的范围仍然存在疑问。研究结果为进一步讨论和制定针对住院患者的自我管理计划提供了一个起点:研究结果可作为实践的起点,以讨论护士支持住院患者自我管理的概念,并针对患者群体制定、实施和研究自我管理计划:报告方法:根据德尔菲研究的开展和报告指南(CREDES)报告结果:患者或公众的贡献:患者作为专家小组成员参与了此次德尔菲研究。影响声明 研究解决了什么问题?对住院期间自我管理支持的研究不足,影响了循证干预措施的发展。主要发现是什么?由患者、护士和研究人员组成的小组就护士支持住院患者自我管理的概念化是否恰当达成了一致,并确定了一些讨论要点,主要涉及自我管理概念的界限。这项研究将对哪些地方和哪些人产生影响?这项研究对于从概念上理解护士如何在住院期间支持患者进行自我管理至关重要。这对有关该主题的政策、临床实践、教育和研究都是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'.

Aim: To determine patients', nurses' and researchers' opinions on the appropriateness and completeness of the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management.

Design: A modified Delphi study.

Methods: We conducted a two-round Delphi survey. The panel group consisted of patients, nurses and researchers. The conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management presented in the first Delphi round was based on previous research, including a scoping review of the literature. Data was analysed between both rounds and after the second round. Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).

Results: In the first round all activities of the proposed conceptualization were considered appropriate to support the patients' self-management. Panel members' comments led to the textual adjustment of 19 activities, the development of 15 new activities, and three general questions related to self-management support during hospitalisation. In the second round the modified and the newly added activities were also deemed appropriate. The clarification statements raised in the first Delphi round were accepted, although questions remained about the wording of the activities and about what is and what is not self-management support.

Conclusion: After textual adjustments and the addition of some activities, the proposed conceptualization of nurses' support in patients' self-management while hospitalised have been considered appropriate and complete. Nevertheless, questions about the scope of this concept still remains. The results provide a starting point for further discussion and the development of self-management programs aimed at the hospitalised patient.

Implication for the profession and/or patient care: The results can be considered as a starting point for practice to discuss the concept of nurses' support for hospitalised patients' self-management and develop, implement and research self-management programs specific for their patient population.

Reporting method: Results are reported in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES).

Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved as expert panellist in this Delphi study. Impact statement What problem did the study address? Self-management support during hospitalisation is understudied, which undermines the development of evidence-based interventions. What were the main findings? A panel, consisting of patients, nurses and researchers, agreed on the appropriateness of a conceptualization of nurses' support of inpatients' self-management, and identified some points for discussion, mainly related to the boundaries of the concept self-management. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study is crucial for generating conceptual understanding of how nurses support patients' self-management during hospitalisation. This is necessary for policy, clinical practice, education, and research on this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信