粘连性囊炎皮质类固醇和扩张(ACCorD)随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Livio Di Mascio, Thomas Hamborg, Borislava Mihaylova, Jamila Kassam, Bina Shah, Beth Stuart, Xavier L Griffin
{"title":"粘连性囊炎皮质类固醇和扩张(ACCorD)随机对照试验。","authors":"Livio Di Mascio, Thomas Hamborg, Borislava Mihaylova, Jamila Kassam, Bina Shah, Beth Stuart, Xavier L Griffin","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Is it feasible to conduct a definitive multicentre trial in community settings of corticosteroid injections (CSI) and hydrodilation (HD) compared to CSI for patients with frozen shoulder? An adequately powered definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) delivered in primary care will inform clinicians and the public whether hydrodilation is a clinically and cost-effective intervention. In this study, prior to a full RCT, we propose a feasibility trial to evaluate recruitment and retention by patient and clinician willingness of randomization; rates of withdrawal, crossover and attrition; and feasibility of outcome data collection from routine primary and secondary care data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises that prompt early management of frozen shoulder is initiated in primary care settings with analgesia, physiotherapy, and joint injections; most people can be managed without an operation. Currently, there is variation in the type of joint injection: 1) CSI, thought to reduce the inflammation of the capsule reducing pain; and 2) HD, where a small volume of fluid is injected into the shoulder joint along with the steroid, aiming to stretch the capsule of the shoulder to improve pain, but also allowing greater movement. The creation of musculoskeletal hubs nationwide provides infrastructure for the early and effective management of frozen shoulder. This potentially reduces costs to individuals and the wider NHS perhaps negating the need for a secondary care referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We will conduct a multicentre RCT comparing CSI and HD in combination with CSI alone. Patients aged 18 years and over with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder will be randomized and blinded to receive either CSI and HD in combination, or CSI alone. Feasibility outcomes include the rate of randomization as a proportion of eligible patients and the ability to use routinely collected data for outcome evaluation. This study has involved patients and the public in the trial design, dissemination methods, and how to include groups who are underserved by research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We will disseminate findings among musculoskeletal clinicians via the British Orthopaedic Association, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, the Royal College of Radiologists, and the Royal College of General Practitioners. To ensure wide reach we will communicate findings through our established network of charities and organizations, in addition to preparing dissemination findings in Bangla and Urdu (commonly spoken languages in northeast London). If a full trial is shown to be feasible, we will seek additional National Institute for Health and Care Research funding for a definitive RCT. This definitive study will inform NICE guidelines for the management of frozen shoulder.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 3","pages":"162-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adhesive Capsulitis Corticosteroid and Dilation (ACCorD) randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Livio Di Mascio, Thomas Hamborg, Borislava Mihaylova, Jamila Kassam, Bina Shah, Beth Stuart, Xavier L Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Is it feasible to conduct a definitive multicentre trial in community settings of corticosteroid injections (CSI) and hydrodilation (HD) compared to CSI for patients with frozen shoulder? An adequately powered definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) delivered in primary care will inform clinicians and the public whether hydrodilation is a clinically and cost-effective intervention. In this study, prior to a full RCT, we propose a feasibility trial to evaluate recruitment and retention by patient and clinician willingness of randomization; rates of withdrawal, crossover and attrition; and feasibility of outcome data collection from routine primary and secondary care data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises that prompt early management of frozen shoulder is initiated in primary care settings with analgesia, physiotherapy, and joint injections; most people can be managed without an operation. Currently, there is variation in the type of joint injection: 1) CSI, thought to reduce the inflammation of the capsule reducing pain; and 2) HD, where a small volume of fluid is injected into the shoulder joint along with the steroid, aiming to stretch the capsule of the shoulder to improve pain, but also allowing greater movement. The creation of musculoskeletal hubs nationwide provides infrastructure for the early and effective management of frozen shoulder. This potentially reduces costs to individuals and the wider NHS perhaps negating the need for a secondary care referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We will conduct a multicentre RCT comparing CSI and HD in combination with CSI alone. Patients aged 18 years and over with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder will be randomized and blinded to receive either CSI and HD in combination, or CSI alone. Feasibility outcomes include the rate of randomization as a proportion of eligible patients and the ability to use routinely collected data for outcome evaluation. This study has involved patients and the public in the trial design, dissemination methods, and how to include groups who are underserved by research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We will disseminate findings among musculoskeletal clinicians via the British Orthopaedic Association, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, the Royal College of Radiologists, and the Royal College of General Practitioners. To ensure wide reach we will communicate findings through our established network of charities and organizations, in addition to preparing dissemination findings in Bangla and Urdu (commonly spoken languages in northeast London). If a full trial is shown to be feasible, we will seek additional National Institute for Health and Care Research funding for a definitive RCT. This definitive study will inform NICE guidelines for the management of frozen shoulder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"162-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在社区环境中对肩周炎患者进行皮质类固醇注射(CSI)和肩关节水压扩张(HD)的多中心试验,并与 CSI 进行比较,是否可行?在基层医疗机构开展充分有效的确定性随机对照试验(RCT)将为临床医生和公众提供信息,说明水压扩张在临床上是否是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。在本研究中,在进行全面的随机对照试验之前,我们建议进行一项可行性试验,通过患者和临床医生的随机意愿来评估招募和保留情况;退出、交叉和自然减员率;以及从常规初级和二级护理数据中收集结果数据的可行性:在英国,国家健康与护理优化研究所(NICE)建议在初级医疗机构对肩周炎进行及时的早期治疗,包括镇痛、理疗和关节注射;大多数患者无需手术即可治愈。目前,关节注射的类型存在差异:1)CSI,被认为能减轻关节囊的炎症,从而减轻疼痛;2)HD,将少量液体与类固醇一起注入肩关节,目的是拉伸肩关节囊,从而改善疼痛,同时也能增加活动度。在全国范围内建立肌肉骨骼中心可为肩周炎的早期有效治疗提供基础设施。这可能会降低个人和整个国家医疗服务体系的成本,也许就不需要二次转诊了:我们将进行一项多中心 RCT 研究,对 CSI 和 HD 联合治疗与单独 CSI 进行比较。年龄在 18 岁及以上、临床诊断为肩周炎的患者将被随机盲法分配,接受 CSI 和 HD 联合治疗或单独 CSI 治疗。可行性结果包括符合条件的患者的随机率,以及使用常规收集的数据进行结果评估的能力。这项研究让患者和公众参与了试验设计、传播方法以及如何将研究服务不足的群体纳入其中:我们将通过英国矫形协会、英国特许物理治疗学会、英国皇家放射医师学会和英国皇家全科医师学会向肌肉骨骼临床医师传播研究结果。为确保广泛传播,我们将通过我们已建立的慈善机构和组织网络传播研究结果,此外,我们还准备用孟加拉语和乌尔都语(伦敦东北部常用语言)传播研究结果。如果证明全面试验是可行的,我们将寻求国家健康与护理研究所的额外资助,以进行最终的 RCT 研究。这项最终研究将为 NICE 的肩周炎治疗指南提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Adhesive Capsulitis Corticosteroid and Dilation (ACCorD) randomized controlled trial.

Aims: Is it feasible to conduct a definitive multicentre trial in community settings of corticosteroid injections (CSI) and hydrodilation (HD) compared to CSI for patients with frozen shoulder? An adequately powered definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) delivered in primary care will inform clinicians and the public whether hydrodilation is a clinically and cost-effective intervention. In this study, prior to a full RCT, we propose a feasibility trial to evaluate recruitment and retention by patient and clinician willingness of randomization; rates of withdrawal, crossover and attrition; and feasibility of outcome data collection from routine primary and secondary care data.

Methods: In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises that prompt early management of frozen shoulder is initiated in primary care settings with analgesia, physiotherapy, and joint injections; most people can be managed without an operation. Currently, there is variation in the type of joint injection: 1) CSI, thought to reduce the inflammation of the capsule reducing pain; and 2) HD, where a small volume of fluid is injected into the shoulder joint along with the steroid, aiming to stretch the capsule of the shoulder to improve pain, but also allowing greater movement. The creation of musculoskeletal hubs nationwide provides infrastructure for the early and effective management of frozen shoulder. This potentially reduces costs to individuals and the wider NHS perhaps negating the need for a secondary care referral.

Results: We will conduct a multicentre RCT comparing CSI and HD in combination with CSI alone. Patients aged 18 years and over with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder will be randomized and blinded to receive either CSI and HD in combination, or CSI alone. Feasibility outcomes include the rate of randomization as a proportion of eligible patients and the ability to use routinely collected data for outcome evaluation. This study has involved patients and the public in the trial design, dissemination methods, and how to include groups who are underserved by research.

Conclusion: We will disseminate findings among musculoskeletal clinicians via the British Orthopaedic Association, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, the Royal College of Radiologists, and the Royal College of General Practitioners. To ensure wide reach we will communicate findings through our established network of charities and organizations, in addition to preparing dissemination findings in Bangla and Urdu (commonly spoken languages in northeast London). If a full trial is shown to be feasible, we will seek additional National Institute for Health and Care Research funding for a definitive RCT. This definitive study will inform NICE guidelines for the management of frozen shoulder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信