阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利生物仿制药定价的跨国比较。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes
{"title":"阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利生物仿制药定价的跨国比较。","authors":"Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Martín Cañás, Martín A Urtasun, Gustavo H Marín, Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque, Lisa Pont, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Marco Tuccori, Ursula Kirchmayer, Luciane Cruz Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00623-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物仿制药是指与已获许可的生物制品(RP)高度相似的生物制品。生物仿制药进入市场有望降低生物治疗的成本:本研究旨在评估生物仿制药价格与四个国家批准的相应生物制品 RP 之间的差异范围:本研究对阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西和意大利的生物仿制药定价进行了跨国比较。研究考察了调查国家的国家主管部门提供的在线价格数据库。生物仿制药价格差异的计算方法是将生物仿制药的单价减去研究用药的单价,再除以研究用药的单价。结果以百分比表示:结果:巴西的生物仿制药价格下降中位数最高(-36.3%),其次是意大利(-20.0%)和阿根廷(-18.6%)。意大利所有生物仿制药的价格都低于零售价,最低降幅为 6.3%,而在澳大利亚,大多数生物仿制药的价格都与零售价持平。在阿根廷,一种英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的价格高于参考值(40.7%),而价格较低的品牌则降低了 14.4%。巴西有四种生物仿制药的价格高于各自的零售价,包括异芬胰岛素(1)、格列奈胰岛素(1)和索马托品(2):这项研究表明,在所研究的国家中,生物仿制药与原研药之间的价格差异非常明显。各国政府应评估其政策是否成功地提高了生物疗法的可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.

A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy.

Background: Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.

Method: This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.

Results: Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).

Conclusion: The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信