存活率不因中心每年的移植量而异--儿科心脏移植协会注册研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
A Marion Ybarra, Alicia M Kamsheh, Matthew J O'Connor, Seth A Hollander, Maria Bano, Michelle Ploutz, Gabrielle Vaughn, Andrea Lambert, Michael Wallendorf, James Kirklin, Charles E Canter
{"title":"存活率不因中心每年的移植量而异--儿科心脏移植协会注册研究。","authors":"A Marion Ybarra, Alicia M Kamsheh, Matthew J O'Connor, Seth A Hollander, Maria Bano, Michelle Ploutz, Gabrielle Vaughn, Andrea Lambert, Michael Wallendorf, James Kirklin, Charles E Canter","doi":"10.1111/petr.14720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between center volume and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Previous studies have not fully accounted for differences in case mix, particularly in high-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) groups. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between center volume and outcomes using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry and explore how case mix may affect outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients in the PHTS Registry who received a heart transplant from 2009 to 2018 was performed. Centers were divided into 5 groups based on average yearly transplant volume. The primary outcome was time to death or graft loss and outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 4583 cases among 55 centers included. There was no difference in time to death or graft loss by center volume in the entire cohort (p = .75), in patients with CHD (p = .79) or in patients with cardiomyopathy (p = .23). There was also no difference in time to death or graft loss by center size in patients undergoing transplant after Norwood, Glenn or Fontan (log rank p = .17, p = .31, and p = .10 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in outcomes by center size in the positive crossmatch group (p < .0001), though no discernible pattern related to high or low center volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes are similar among transplant centers of all sizes, including for high-risk patient groups with CHD. Future work is needed to understand how patient-specific risk factors may vary among centers of various sizes and whether this influences patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20038,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival does not differ by annual center transplant volume-A Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Registry study.\",\"authors\":\"A Marion Ybarra, Alicia M Kamsheh, Matthew J O'Connor, Seth A Hollander, Maria Bano, Michelle Ploutz, Gabrielle Vaughn, Andrea Lambert, Michael Wallendorf, James Kirklin, Charles E Canter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/petr.14720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between center volume and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Previous studies have not fully accounted for differences in case mix, particularly in high-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) groups. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between center volume and outcomes using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry and explore how case mix may affect outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients in the PHTS Registry who received a heart transplant from 2009 to 2018 was performed. Centers were divided into 5 groups based on average yearly transplant volume. The primary outcome was time to death or graft loss and outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 4583 cases among 55 centers included. There was no difference in time to death or graft loss by center volume in the entire cohort (p = .75), in patients with CHD (p = .79) or in patients with cardiomyopathy (p = .23). There was also no difference in time to death or graft loss by center size in patients undergoing transplant after Norwood, Glenn or Fontan (log rank p = .17, p = .31, and p = .10 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in outcomes by center size in the positive crossmatch group (p < .0001), though no discernible pattern related to high or low center volume.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes are similar among transplant centers of all sizes, including for high-risk patient groups with CHD. Future work is needed to understand how patient-specific risk factors may vary among centers of various sizes and whether this influences patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于中心规模与小儿心脏移植手术结果之间的关系,存在相互矛盾的数据。以往的研究没有充分考虑病例组合的差异,尤其是高风险先天性心脏病(CHD)组。我们的目的是利用小儿心脏移植协会(PHTS)登记册评估中心规模与疗效之间的关系,并探讨病例组合如何影响疗效:我们对PHTS注册中心2009年至2018年接受心脏移植的所有儿科患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据年平均移植量将中心分为 5 组。主要结果是死亡或移植物丢失的时间,并使用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析法对结果进行比较:结果:55个中心共纳入4583个病例。在整个队列中,死亡或移植物丢失的时间在中心数量(P = .75)、心脏病患者(P = .79)或心肌病患者(P = .23)中没有差异。诺伍德、格伦或丰坦移植患者的死亡时间或移植物损失也没有因中心大小而异(对数秩分别为 p = .17、p = .31 和 p = .10)。在交叉配型阳性组中,不同中心规模的移植结果差异有统计学意义(p 结论:不同中心规模的移植结果相似:各种规模的移植中心,包括患有心脏病的高风险患者群体,其结果都是相似的。今后需要开展工作,以了解患者的特定风险因素在不同规模的移植中心之间有何差异,以及这是否会影响患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival does not differ by annual center transplant volume-A Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Registry study.

Background: There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between center volume and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Previous studies have not fully accounted for differences in case mix, particularly in high-risk congenital heart disease (CHD) groups. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between center volume and outcomes using the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) Registry and explore how case mix may affect outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients in the PHTS Registry who received a heart transplant from 2009 to 2018 was performed. Centers were divided into 5 groups based on average yearly transplant volume. The primary outcome was time to death or graft loss and outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: There were 4583 cases among 55 centers included. There was no difference in time to death or graft loss by center volume in the entire cohort (p = .75), in patients with CHD (p = .79) or in patients with cardiomyopathy (p = .23). There was also no difference in time to death or graft loss by center size in patients undergoing transplant after Norwood, Glenn or Fontan (log rank p = .17, p = .31, and p = .10 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in outcomes by center size in the positive crossmatch group (p < .0001), though no discernible pattern related to high or low center volume.

Conclusions: Outcomes are similar among transplant centers of all sizes, including for high-risk patient groups with CHD. Future work is needed to understand how patient-specific risk factors may vary among centers of various sizes and whether this influences patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Transplantation
Pediatric Transplantation 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
216
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Pediatric Transplantation is to publish original articles of the highest quality on clinical experience and basic research in transplantation of tissues and solid organs in infants, children and adolescents. The journal seeks to disseminate the latest information widely to all individuals involved in kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestine and stem cell (bone-marrow) transplantation. In addition, the journal publishes focused reviews on topics relevant to pediatric transplantation as well as timely editorial comment on controversial issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信