Bin Shi , Kevin Zhang , David J. Fleet , Robert A. McLeod , R.J. Dwayne Miller , Jane Y. Howe
{"title":"根据低温电子显微镜投影进行生物分子三维异质重建的深度生成先验。","authors":"Bin Shi , Kevin Zhang , David J. Fleet , Robert A. McLeod , R.J. Dwayne Miller , Jane Y. Howe","doi":"10.1016/j.jsb.2024.108073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cryo-electron microscopy has become a powerful tool to determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of rigid biological macromolecules from noisy micrographs with single-particle reconstruction. Recently, deep neural networks, e.g., CryoDRGN, have demonstrated conformational and compositional heterogeneity of complexes. However, the lack of ground-truth conformations poses a challenge to assess the performance of heterogeneity analysis methods. In this work, variational autoencoders (VAE) with three types of deep generative priors were learned for latent variable inference and heterogeneous 3D reconstruction via Bayesian inference. More specifically, VAEs with “Variational Mixture of Posteriors” priors (VampPrior-SPR), non-parametric exemplar-based priors (ExemplarPrior-SPR) and priors from latent score-based generative models (LSGM-SPR) were quantitatively compared with CryoDRGN. We built four simulated datasets composed of hypothetical continuous conformation or discrete states of the hERG K + channel. Empirical and quantitative comparisons of inferred latent representations were performed with affine-transformation-based metrics. These models with more informative priors gave better regularized, interpretable factorized latent representations with better conserved pairwise distances, less deformed latent distributions and lower within-cluster variances. They were also tested on experimental datasets to resolve compositional and conformational heterogeneity (50S ribosome assembly, cowpea chlorotic mottle virus, and pre-catalytic spliceosome) with comparable high resolution. Codes and data are available: https://github.com/benjamin3344/DGP-SPR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of structural biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847724000133/pdfft?md5=3206ac69857bd12de4ee871dac621d47&pid=1-s2.0-S1047847724000133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep generative priors for biomolecular 3D heterogeneous reconstruction from cryo-EM projections\",\"authors\":\"Bin Shi , Kevin Zhang , David J. Fleet , Robert A. McLeod , R.J. Dwayne Miller , Jane Y. Howe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsb.2024.108073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cryo-electron microscopy has become a powerful tool to determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of rigid biological macromolecules from noisy micrographs with single-particle reconstruction. Recently, deep neural networks, e.g., CryoDRGN, have demonstrated conformational and compositional heterogeneity of complexes. However, the lack of ground-truth conformations poses a challenge to assess the performance of heterogeneity analysis methods. In this work, variational autoencoders (VAE) with three types of deep generative priors were learned for latent variable inference and heterogeneous 3D reconstruction via Bayesian inference. More specifically, VAEs with “Variational Mixture of Posteriors” priors (VampPrior-SPR), non-parametric exemplar-based priors (ExemplarPrior-SPR) and priors from latent score-based generative models (LSGM-SPR) were quantitatively compared with CryoDRGN. We built four simulated datasets composed of hypothetical continuous conformation or discrete states of the hERG K + channel. Empirical and quantitative comparisons of inferred latent representations were performed with affine-transformation-based metrics. These models with more informative priors gave better regularized, interpretable factorized latent representations with better conserved pairwise distances, less deformed latent distributions and lower within-cluster variances. They were also tested on experimental datasets to resolve compositional and conformational heterogeneity (50S ribosome assembly, cowpea chlorotic mottle virus, and pre-catalytic spliceosome) with comparable high resolution. Codes and data are available: https://github.com/benjamin3344/DGP-SPR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of structural biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847724000133/pdfft?md5=3206ac69857bd12de4ee871dac621d47&pid=1-s2.0-S1047847724000133-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of structural biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847724000133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847724000133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep generative priors for biomolecular 3D heterogeneous reconstruction from cryo-EM projections
Cryo-electron microscopy has become a powerful tool to determine three-dimensional (3D) structures of rigid biological macromolecules from noisy micrographs with single-particle reconstruction. Recently, deep neural networks, e.g., CryoDRGN, have demonstrated conformational and compositional heterogeneity of complexes. However, the lack of ground-truth conformations poses a challenge to assess the performance of heterogeneity analysis methods. In this work, variational autoencoders (VAE) with three types of deep generative priors were learned for latent variable inference and heterogeneous 3D reconstruction via Bayesian inference. More specifically, VAEs with “Variational Mixture of Posteriors” priors (VampPrior-SPR), non-parametric exemplar-based priors (ExemplarPrior-SPR) and priors from latent score-based generative models (LSGM-SPR) were quantitatively compared with CryoDRGN. We built four simulated datasets composed of hypothetical continuous conformation or discrete states of the hERG K + channel. Empirical and quantitative comparisons of inferred latent representations were performed with affine-transformation-based metrics. These models with more informative priors gave better regularized, interpretable factorized latent representations with better conserved pairwise distances, less deformed latent distributions and lower within-cluster variances. They were also tested on experimental datasets to resolve compositional and conformational heterogeneity (50S ribosome assembly, cowpea chlorotic mottle virus, and pre-catalytic spliceosome) with comparable high resolution. Codes and data are available: https://github.com/benjamin3344/DGP-SPR.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Structural Biology (JSB) has an open access mirror journal, the Journal of Structural Biology: X (JSBX), sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Since both journals share the same editorial system, you may submit your manuscript via either journal homepage. You will be prompted during submission (and revision) to choose in which to publish your article. The editors and reviewers are not aware of the choice you made until the article has been published online. JSB and JSBX publish papers dealing with the structural analysis of living material at every level of organization by all methods that lead to an understanding of biological function in terms of molecular and supermolecular structure.
Techniques covered include:
• Light microscopy including confocal microscopy
• All types of electron microscopy
• X-ray diffraction
• Nuclear magnetic resonance
• Scanning force microscopy, scanning probe microscopy, and tunneling microscopy
• Digital image processing
• Computational insights into structure