评估全科医生对不同依赖程度的老年人的处方:横断面研究

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Tânia Coelho, Inês Rosendo, Carlos Seiça Cardoso
{"title":"评估全科医生对不同依赖程度的老年人的处方:横断面研究","authors":"Tânia Coelho, Inês Rosendo, Carlos Seiça Cardoso","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02299-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polypharmacy is easily achieved in elderly patients with multimorbidity and it is associated with a higher risk of potentially inappropriate medication use and worse health outcomes. Studies have shown that deprescription is safe, however, some barriers have been identified. The aim of this study was to analyse Portuguese General Practitioners (GP) deprescription’s attitudes using clinical vignettes. Cross-sectional study using an online survey with 3 sections: demographic and professional characterization; two clinical vignettes with an elderly patient with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in which the dependency level varies; barriers and factors influencing deprescription. Frequencies, means, and standard deviations were calculated to describe the GPs. Analysis of the deprescription attitude, globally and for each drug, for each clinical vignette applying the McNeemar’s test. A sample of 396 GP was obtained with a mean age of 38 years, most of them female. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in deprescribing according to the patient dependency level, with more GPs (80.4% versus 75.3%) deprescribing in the most dependent patient. A statistically significant difference was found for all drugs except for antihypertensive drugs. All medications were deprescribed more often in dependent patients except for anti-dementia drugs. More than 70% of the participants considered life expectancy and quality of life as “very important” factors for deprescription and more than 90% classified the existence of guidelines and the risks and benefits of medication as “very important” or “important”. In the open question, the factors most reported by the GP were those related to the patient (52,9%). This is the largest study on this topic carried out in Portugal using clinical vignettes, with a representative sample of Portuguese GP. The level of dependence significatively influenced the deprescription attitude of Portuguese GPs. The majority of the GPs classified the quality of life, life expectancies, potential negative effects and the existence of guidelines as “very important” or “important” while deprescribing. It is important to develop and test deprescribing in real life studies to analyze if these attitudes are the same in daily practice.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of deprescription by general practitioners in elderly people with different levels of dependence: cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Tânia Coelho, Inês Rosendo, Carlos Seiça Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-024-02299-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polypharmacy is easily achieved in elderly patients with multimorbidity and it is associated with a higher risk of potentially inappropriate medication use and worse health outcomes. Studies have shown that deprescription is safe, however, some barriers have been identified. The aim of this study was to analyse Portuguese General Practitioners (GP) deprescription’s attitudes using clinical vignettes. Cross-sectional study using an online survey with 3 sections: demographic and professional characterization; two clinical vignettes with an elderly patient with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in which the dependency level varies; barriers and factors influencing deprescription. Frequencies, means, and standard deviations were calculated to describe the GPs. Analysis of the deprescription attitude, globally and for each drug, for each clinical vignette applying the McNeemar’s test. A sample of 396 GP was obtained with a mean age of 38 years, most of them female. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in deprescribing according to the patient dependency level, with more GPs (80.4% versus 75.3%) deprescribing in the most dependent patient. A statistically significant difference was found for all drugs except for antihypertensive drugs. All medications were deprescribed more often in dependent patients except for anti-dementia drugs. More than 70% of the participants considered life expectancy and quality of life as “very important” factors for deprescription and more than 90% classified the existence of guidelines and the risks and benefits of medication as “very important” or “important”. In the open question, the factors most reported by the GP were those related to the patient (52,9%). This is the largest study on this topic carried out in Portugal using clinical vignettes, with a representative sample of Portuguese GP. The level of dependence significatively influenced the deprescription attitude of Portuguese GPs. The majority of the GPs classified the quality of life, life expectancies, potential negative effects and the existence of guidelines as “very important” or “important” while deprescribing. It is important to develop and test deprescribing in real life studies to analyze if these attitudes are the same in daily practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02299-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02299-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有多病的老年患者很容易出现多重用药的情况,而这与潜在的用药不当风险较高和健康状况较差有关。研究表明,取消处方是安全的,但也发现了一些障碍。本研究旨在通过临床案例分析葡萄牙全科医生(GP)对开具处方的态度。横断面研究采用在线调查的方式,包括三个部分:人口统计学和专业特征;两个临床案例,案例中的老年患者患有多种疾病和多种药物,对药物的依赖程度各不相同;影响处方的障碍和因素。通过计算频率、平均值和标准差来描述全科医生。采用麦克尼玛检验法对每个临床案例的总体和每种药物的处方态度进行分析。样本中有 396 名全科医生,平均年龄为 38 岁,大部分为女性。根据患者依赖程度的不同,全科医生开出的处方存在明显差异(P < 0.01),依赖程度最高的患者开出的处方更多(80.4% 对 75.3%)。除抗高血压药物外,其他所有药物的处方量在统计学上都存在明显差异。除抗痴呆药物外,所有药物在依赖性患者中的处方率都较高。超过 70% 的参与者认为预期寿命和生活质量是 "非常重要 "的停药因素,超过 90% 的参与者将是否存在指导方针以及药物的风险和益处列为 "非常重要 "或 "重要 "的因素。在开放性问题中,全科医生报告最多的因素是与病人有关的因素(52.9%)。这是葡萄牙就这一主题开展的规模最大的研究,该研究使用了临床小故事,对葡萄牙全科医生进行了代表性抽样调查。依赖程度对葡萄牙全科医生的处方态度有显著影响。大多数全科医生在开处方时将生活质量、预期寿命、潜在负面影响和是否存在指南列为 "非常重要 "或 "重要"。重要的是要在现实生活中开展和测试去处方化研究,以分析这些态度在日常实践中是否相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of deprescription by general practitioners in elderly people with different levels of dependence: cross-sectional study
Polypharmacy is easily achieved in elderly patients with multimorbidity and it is associated with a higher risk of potentially inappropriate medication use and worse health outcomes. Studies have shown that deprescription is safe, however, some barriers have been identified. The aim of this study was to analyse Portuguese General Practitioners (GP) deprescription’s attitudes using clinical vignettes. Cross-sectional study using an online survey with 3 sections: demographic and professional characterization; two clinical vignettes with an elderly patient with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in which the dependency level varies; barriers and factors influencing deprescription. Frequencies, means, and standard deviations were calculated to describe the GPs. Analysis of the deprescription attitude, globally and for each drug, for each clinical vignette applying the McNeemar’s test. A sample of 396 GP was obtained with a mean age of 38 years, most of them female. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in deprescribing according to the patient dependency level, with more GPs (80.4% versus 75.3%) deprescribing in the most dependent patient. A statistically significant difference was found for all drugs except for antihypertensive drugs. All medications were deprescribed more often in dependent patients except for anti-dementia drugs. More than 70% of the participants considered life expectancy and quality of life as “very important” factors for deprescription and more than 90% classified the existence of guidelines and the risks and benefits of medication as “very important” or “important”. In the open question, the factors most reported by the GP were those related to the patient (52,9%). This is the largest study on this topic carried out in Portugal using clinical vignettes, with a representative sample of Portuguese GP. The level of dependence significatively influenced the deprescription attitude of Portuguese GPs. The majority of the GPs classified the quality of life, life expectancies, potential negative effects and the existence of guidelines as “very important” or “important” while deprescribing. It is important to develop and test deprescribing in real life studies to analyze if these attitudes are the same in daily practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信