Seyed Kourosh Mahjour, Giovanni Liguori, Salah A. Faroughi
{"title":"在气候不确定性条件下为北美西部选择具有代表性的大气环流模式","authors":"Seyed Kourosh Mahjour, Giovanni Liguori, Salah A. Faroughi","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2024.541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change research uses an ensemble of general circulation model runs (GCMs-runs) to predict future climate under uncertainties. To reduce computational costs, this study selects representative GCM-runs (RGCM-runs) for Western North America (WNA) based on their performance in replicating historical climate conditions from 1981 to 2005 and projecting future changes from 1981–2010 to 2071–2100. This evaluation is conducted under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5. By using an envelope-based selection technique and a multi-objective distance-based approach, we identify four RGCM-runs per RCP representing diverse climatic conditions, including wet-warm, wet-cold, dry-warm, and dry-cold. Compared to the full-set, these selected runs show a decreased mean absolute error (MAE) between the reference and RGCM-runs concerning the monthly average mean air temperature (<em>T̄</em>) and precipitation (<em>P̄</em>). For RCP4.5, <em>T̄</em> MAE is 0.45 (vs. 0.58 in the full-set) and <em>P̄</em> MAE is 0.31 (vs. 0.42). For RCP8.5, <em>T̄</em> MAE is 0.51 (vs. 0.75) and <em>P̄</em> MAE is 0.25 (vs. 0.36). The lower MAE values in the RGCM-run set indicate closer alignment between predicted and reference values, making the RGCM-run suitable for climate impact assessments in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":510893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water & Climate Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of representative general circulation models under climatic uncertainty for Western North America\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Kourosh Mahjour, Giovanni Liguori, Salah A. Faroughi\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wcc.2024.541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate change research uses an ensemble of general circulation model runs (GCMs-runs) to predict future climate under uncertainties. To reduce computational costs, this study selects representative GCM-runs (RGCM-runs) for Western North America (WNA) based on their performance in replicating historical climate conditions from 1981 to 2005 and projecting future changes from 1981–2010 to 2071–2100. This evaluation is conducted under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5. By using an envelope-based selection technique and a multi-objective distance-based approach, we identify four RGCM-runs per RCP representing diverse climatic conditions, including wet-warm, wet-cold, dry-warm, and dry-cold. Compared to the full-set, these selected runs show a decreased mean absolute error (MAE) between the reference and RGCM-runs concerning the monthly average mean air temperature (<em>T̄</em>) and precipitation (<em>P̄</em>). For RCP4.5, <em>T̄</em> MAE is 0.45 (vs. 0.58 in the full-set) and <em>P̄</em> MAE is 0.31 (vs. 0.42). For RCP8.5, <em>T̄</em> MAE is 0.51 (vs. 0.75) and <em>P̄</em> MAE is 0.25 (vs. 0.36). The lower MAE values in the RGCM-run set indicate closer alignment between predicted and reference values, making the RGCM-run suitable for climate impact assessments in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":510893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water & Climate Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water & Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water & Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
气候变化研究使用一系列大气环流模式运行(GCMs-runs)来预测不确定条件下的未来气候。为降低计算成本,本研究根据其在复制 1981 年至 2005 年历史气候条件以及预测 1981-2010 年至 2071-2100 年未来变化方面的表现,为北美西部(WNA)选择了具有代表性的 GCM 运行(RGCM-runs)。该评估是在耦合模式相互比较项目 5 的两种代表性浓度路径 (RCP) 情景下进行的,即 RCP4.5 和 RCP8.5。通过使用基于包络的选择技术和基于多目标距离的方法,我们为每个 RCP 确定了代表不同气候条件的四个 RGCM 运行,包括湿-暖、湿-冷、干-暖和干-冷。与全集相比,这些选定的运行表明,在月平均气温(T̄)和降水量(P̄)方面,参考运行与 RGCM 运行之间的平均绝对误差(MAE)有所减小。对于 RCP4.5,T̄ MAE 为 0.45(全集为 0.58),P̄ MAE 为 0.31(全集为 0.42)。对于 RCP8.5,T̄ MAE 为 0.51(对 0.75),P̄ MAE 为 0.25(对 0.36)。RGCM 运行集的 MAE 值较低,表明预测值与参考值更接近,因此 RGCM 运行适合该地区的气候影响评估。
Selection of representative general circulation models under climatic uncertainty for Western North America
Climate change research uses an ensemble of general circulation model runs (GCMs-runs) to predict future climate under uncertainties. To reduce computational costs, this study selects representative GCM-runs (RGCM-runs) for Western North America (WNA) based on their performance in replicating historical climate conditions from 1981 to 2005 and projecting future changes from 1981–2010 to 2071–2100. This evaluation is conducted under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5. By using an envelope-based selection technique and a multi-objective distance-based approach, we identify four RGCM-runs per RCP representing diverse climatic conditions, including wet-warm, wet-cold, dry-warm, and dry-cold. Compared to the full-set, these selected runs show a decreased mean absolute error (MAE) between the reference and RGCM-runs concerning the monthly average mean air temperature (T̄) and precipitation (P̄). For RCP4.5, T̄ MAE is 0.45 (vs. 0.58 in the full-set) and P̄ MAE is 0.31 (vs. 0.42). For RCP8.5, T̄ MAE is 0.51 (vs. 0.75) and P̄ MAE is 0.25 (vs. 0.36). The lower MAE values in the RGCM-run set indicate closer alignment between predicted and reference values, making the RGCM-run suitable for climate impact assessments in the region.