{"title":"通过超声监测改善胆管癌的生存结果:多中心回顾性队列","authors":"Nittaya Chamadol, Vallop Laopaiboon, Apiwat Jareanrat, Vasin Thanasukarn, Tharatip Srisuk, Vor Luvira, Poowanai Sarkhampee, Winai Ungpinitpong, Phummarat Khamvijite, Yutthapong Chumnanua, Nipath Nethuwakul, Passakorn Sodarat, Samrit Thammarit, Anchalee Techasen, Jaruwan Thuanman, Chaiwat Tawarungruang, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Watcharin Loilome, Piya Prajumwongs, Attapol Titapun","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.29.24303543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nMost cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients present with late stage of disease because of the difficulty to diagnosis at an early stage, resulting in poor survival of CCA patients. The Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program showed that ultrasound screening was an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA. This study aims to evaluate the survival outcome of patients diagnosed by ultrasound screening (US) compared to walk-in symptomatic patients.\nMethods\n5-year survival rates (5-YSR) and median survival time (MST) of CCA were calculated using Log-Rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed for significant factors from univariate analyses.\nResults\nA total of 711 histologically proven CCA cases were examined including ultrasound screening and walk-in groups. The screening group having 5-YSR was 53.9%, and MST was of 67.2 months, while walk-in group, the 5-YSR was 21.9% and MST was 15.6 months (p<0.001). In addition, multivariate analyses revealed that screening program was an independent factor to predict a good outcome of CCA patients when compared with walk-in group (p = 0.014).\nConclusion\nUS is an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA leading to improve clinical outcome of CCA patients. Practically, US should be considered as a first tool for screening CCA in risk populations.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Cholangiocarcinoma by Ultrasonography Surveillance: Multicenter Retrospective Cohorts\",\"authors\":\"Nittaya Chamadol, Vallop Laopaiboon, Apiwat Jareanrat, Vasin Thanasukarn, Tharatip Srisuk, Vor Luvira, Poowanai Sarkhampee, Winai Ungpinitpong, Phummarat Khamvijite, Yutthapong Chumnanua, Nipath Nethuwakul, Passakorn Sodarat, Samrit Thammarit, Anchalee Techasen, Jaruwan Thuanman, Chaiwat Tawarungruang, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Watcharin Loilome, Piya Prajumwongs, Attapol Titapun\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.29.24303543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction\\nMost cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients present with late stage of disease because of the difficulty to diagnosis at an early stage, resulting in poor survival of CCA patients. The Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program showed that ultrasound screening was an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA. This study aims to evaluate the survival outcome of patients diagnosed by ultrasound screening (US) compared to walk-in symptomatic patients.\\nMethods\\n5-year survival rates (5-YSR) and median survival time (MST) of CCA were calculated using Log-Rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed for significant factors from univariate analyses.\\nResults\\nA total of 711 histologically proven CCA cases were examined including ultrasound screening and walk-in groups. The screening group having 5-YSR was 53.9%, and MST was of 67.2 months, while walk-in group, the 5-YSR was 21.9% and MST was 15.6 months (p<0.001). In addition, multivariate analyses revealed that screening program was an independent factor to predict a good outcome of CCA patients when compared with walk-in group (p = 0.014).\\nConclusion\\nUS is an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA leading to improve clinical outcome of CCA patients. Practically, US should be considered as a first tool for screening CCA in risk populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.29.24303543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.29.24303543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:由于难以早期诊断,大多数胆管癌(CCA)患者都是晚期,导致 CCA 患者的生存率很低。胆管癌筛查和护理计划显示,超声筛查是发现早期 CCA 的有效工具。本研究旨在评估通过超声筛查(US)确诊的患者与无症状患者的生存结果。方法采用 Log-Rank 检验计算 CCA 的 5 年生存率(5-YSR)和中位生存时间(MST)。结果 共检查了 711 例经组织学证实的 CCA 病例,包括超声筛查组和无症患者组。筛查组的 5-YSR 为 53.9%,MST 为 67.2 个月,而就诊组的 5-YSR 为 21.9%,MST 为 15.6 个月(p<0.001)。此外,多变量分析显示,与步行组相比,筛查项目是预测 CCA 患者良好预后的独立因素(p = 0.014)。实际上,US 应被视为高危人群筛查 CCA 的首选工具。
Improvement of Survival Outcomes of Cholangiocarcinoma by Ultrasonography Surveillance: Multicenter Retrospective Cohorts
Introduction
Most cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients present with late stage of disease because of the difficulty to diagnosis at an early stage, resulting in poor survival of CCA patients. The Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program showed that ultrasound screening was an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA. This study aims to evaluate the survival outcome of patients diagnosed by ultrasound screening (US) compared to walk-in symptomatic patients.
Methods
5-year survival rates (5-YSR) and median survival time (MST) of CCA were calculated using Log-Rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed for significant factors from univariate analyses.
Results
A total of 711 histologically proven CCA cases were examined including ultrasound screening and walk-in groups. The screening group having 5-YSR was 53.9%, and MST was of 67.2 months, while walk-in group, the 5-YSR was 21.9% and MST was 15.6 months (p<0.001). In addition, multivariate analyses revealed that screening program was an independent factor to predict a good outcome of CCA patients when compared with walk-in group (p = 0.014).
Conclusion
US is an effective tool for detecting early stage CCA leading to improve clinical outcome of CCA patients. Practically, US should be considered as a first tool for screening CCA in risk populations.