在参与性市场环境中展示事实上的负责任研究与创新 (rri) 的深度制度化：玻利维亚和荷兰的实例

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365

Sally Randles, Allison Loconto, Marc Steen

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的论文重新提出了负责任创新的深度制度化概念，考虑了添加 "深度 "这一形容词的原因和方式。我们将事实上的负责任研究与负责任创新区分开来。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands

Our paper reprises the concept deep institutionalisation of responsible innovation considering why and how it matters to add the adjective ‘deep’. We distinguish de facto responsible research and i...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.