促进医疗保健利益相关者跨专业对话和行动的创新模式:ASAHP 利益相关者合作参与模式。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Sabina Kupershmidt, Kathryn Bell, Amber Boyd, Genevieve Zipp, Anthony Breitbach
{"title":"促进医疗保健利益相关者跨专业对话和行动的创新模式:ASAHP 利益相关者合作参与模式。","authors":"Sabina Kupershmidt, Kathryn Bell, Amber Boyd, Genevieve Zipp, Anthony Breitbach","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ASAHP established the Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) in 2017 to identify strategies for clinical education. Implementing the CETF recommendations requires continuous collaboration between healthcare industry and academic partners.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>ASAHP Regional Summits were planned and implemented to offer an active learning environment for stakeholders, strengthen translational skills, identify gaps in interprofessional collaborative practice (IPC), and create lasting networking opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Regional Summits were organized in a standard format across three hub sites. During a virtual \"Harvest\" session all sites were video linked to continue the local dialogue on a national level. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed methods, including pre- and post-session surveys quantitative methods. Notes from table discussions were analyzed using a qualitative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative results offered a rich dataset from the industry and academic perspective to provide a better understanding how the CETF recommendations are being understood. Ideas for future action and partnerships were identified. Various regions contributed insights that reflect unique environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model offers a robust and reproducible active adult learning model for IPC that can lead to change and continued engagement. These findings identify opportunities for deepening the connections made through regional hubs.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Model for Promoting Interprofessional Dialogue and Action Across Healthcare Stakeholders: The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model.\",\"authors\":\"Sabina Kupershmidt, Kathryn Bell, Amber Boyd, Genevieve Zipp, Anthony Breitbach\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ASAHP established the Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) in 2017 to identify strategies for clinical education. Implementing the CETF recommendations requires continuous collaboration between healthcare industry and academic partners.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>ASAHP Regional Summits were planned and implemented to offer an active learning environment for stakeholders, strengthen translational skills, identify gaps in interprofessional collaborative practice (IPC), and create lasting networking opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Regional Summits were organized in a standard format across three hub sites. During a virtual \\\"Harvest\\\" session all sites were video linked to continue the local dialogue on a national level. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed methods, including pre- and post-session surveys quantitative methods. Notes from table discussions were analyzed using a qualitative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative results offered a rich dataset from the industry and academic perspective to provide a better understanding how the CETF recommendations are being understood. Ideas for future action and partnerships were identified. Various regions contributed insights that reflect unique environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model offers a robust and reproducible active adult learning model for IPC that can lead to change and continued engagement. These findings identify opportunities for deepening the connections made through regional hubs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"3-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2017年,ASAHP成立了临床教育工作组(CETF),以确定临床教育战略。实施 CETF 的建议需要医疗保健行业和学术合作伙伴之间的持续合作。目标:计划并实施 ASAHP 区域峰会,为利益相关者提供一个积极的学习环境,加强转化技能,找出专业间合作实践(IPC)中的差距,并创造持久的交流机会:方法:地区峰会以标准形式在三个中心地点举行。在虚拟的 "收获 "会议上,所有地点都进行了视频连接,以便在全国范围内继续当地的对话。成果分析采用混合方法,包括会前和会后调查定量方法。此外,还采用定性方法对会议讨论记录进行了分析:定性结果从行业和学术角度提供了丰富的数据集,使人们更好地了解如何理解 CETF 建议。确定了未来行动和合作伙伴关系的思路。不同地区提出了反映独特环境的见解:ASAHP 利益相关者合作参与模式为 IPC 提供了一个强大的、可重复的、积极的成人学习模式,该模式可促成变革和持续参与。这些发现为深化通过地区中心建立的联系提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative Model for Promoting Interprofessional Dialogue and Action Across Healthcare Stakeholders: The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model.

Background: The ASAHP established the Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) in 2017 to identify strategies for clinical education. Implementing the CETF recommendations requires continuous collaboration between healthcare industry and academic partners.

Aim: ASAHP Regional Summits were planned and implemented to offer an active learning environment for stakeholders, strengthen translational skills, identify gaps in interprofessional collaborative practice (IPC), and create lasting networking opportunities.

Methods: The Regional Summits were organized in a standard format across three hub sites. During a virtual "Harvest" session all sites were video linked to continue the local dialogue on a national level. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed methods, including pre- and post-session surveys quantitative methods. Notes from table discussions were analyzed using a qualitative approach.

Results: Qualitative results offered a rich dataset from the industry and academic perspective to provide a better understanding how the CETF recommendations are being understood. Ideas for future action and partnerships were identified. Various regions contributed insights that reflect unique environments.

Conclusions: The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model offers a robust and reproducible active adult learning model for IPC that can lead to change and continued engagement. These findings identify opportunities for deepening the connections made through regional hubs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信