确定可感知的静态眼睑不对称程度和面部内翻的影响:横断面试验研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Frank G Preston, Ziyaad Sultan, James Hsuan, Kevin J Hamill, Austin G McCormick
{"title":"确定可感知的静态眼睑不对称程度和面部内翻的影响:横断面试验研究。","authors":"Frank G Preston, Ziyaad Sultan, James Hsuan, Kevin J Hamill, Austin G McCormick","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Frank G Preston, Ziyaad Sultan, James Hsuan, Kevin J Hamill, Austin G McCormick\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002650\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定可感知的静态眼睑不对称程度,以及这种程度是否会受到图像反转的影响:对 3 名志愿者的图像进行数字处理,使上睑下垂、上睑后缩和下睑后缩这 3 种不同类型的眼睑不对称程度分别为 0.5 毫米、1 毫米或 1.5 毫米。49 位非专业人士说明了图像是对称的还是不对称的。由 29 名临床医生完成的另一项倒置调查包括对称图像和 1 毫米不对称图像,其中一半为倒置图像:结果:上睑下垂、上睑回缩和下睑回缩在严重程度为 0.5 毫米时未被大多数非专业人士检测到(检测率分别为 18.9%、6.7% 和 18.9%),但当不对称程度达到 1 毫米时,大多数参与者都能检测到这三种情况(检测率分别为 65.7%、61.8% 和 51.0%),而在 1.5 毫米时,检测率上升到 70% 以上(检测率分别为 92.2%、73.5% 和 73.5%)。与以正确方向显示的图像相比,反转图像导致不对称人脸的正确识别率降低了 19.7%(正常图像中不对称识别率为 80.7%,反转图像中为 61.0%,P < 0.001):大多数非专业人士都能发现严重程度为 1 毫米的所有不对称现象。图像反转会降低临床医生检测 1 毫米不对称的能力,这表明术中视图的不对称感知能力受损。这项研究为不同程度的眼睑不对称患者提供了咨询服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.

Purpose: To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion.

Methods: Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted.

Results: Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信