Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz
{"title":"经皮射频透热疗法与超声波疗法对斜方肌上部潜在肌筋膜触发点的影响:随机交叉试验","authors":"Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of transcutaneous radiofrequency diathermy versus ultrasound on latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius: A randomized crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Paula Cordova-Alegre, Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Jose Manuel Burgos-Bragado, Daniel Sanjuan-Sánchez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-230296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230296\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前,射频透热疗法在治疗颈部疼痛方面的应用正在蓬勃发展:本研究旨在评估数字电容透热疗法(DCD®)对斜方肌上部潜在肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)患者的僵硬、疼痛、颈椎活动范围和颈椎残疾的临床疗效,并将其与超声波(US)进行比较:19名斜方肌上部潜伏性MTrP患者参加了这项由评估者掩蔽的随机临床交叉试验。受试者接受了两种干预:治疗效果通过肌电图变量、压痛阈值(PPT)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、颈椎侧弯屈幅度和颈部残疾指数量表(NDI)进行测量:结果:在结果指标的变化方面,US 组和 DCD® 组的干预没有明显差异。在 VAS 方面,US 组从 2.16 分到 1.13 分(p= 0.005;r= 0.646)的差异具有统计学意义。DCD® 干预后一周,NDI 有了 1.11 分的显著改善(95% CI 0.14-2.07;p= 0.27;d= 0.217):我们的研究结果表明,DCD® 和 US 均可被视为治疗潜伏性 MTrPs 的有效方法,其中 DCD® 疗法的作用时间更长。
Effects of transcutaneous radiofrequency diathermy versus ultrasound on latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius: A randomized crossover trial.
Background: Currently, the use of radiofrequency diathermy for the treatment of neck pain is booming.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Digital Capacitive Diathermy (DCD®) on stiffness, pain, cervical range of motion, and cervical disability and to compare it with ultrasound (US) in patients with latent myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in the upper trapezius.
Methods: Nineteen participants with latent MTrPs in the upper trapezius were included in the assessor-masked, randomized, clinical crossover trial. Subjects were exposed to both interventions: US and DCD® and treatment effectiveness was measured by myotonometric variables, pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical side-bending flexion ranges, and the neck disability index scale (NDI).
Results: There were no significant differences between US and DCD® interventions regarding changes in outcome measures. The US group achieved a statistically significant difference of 2.16 to 1.13 points (p= 0.005; r= 0.646) for the VAS. The DCD® intervention showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.11 points for the NDI at 1-week following intervention (95% CI 0.14-2.07; p= 0.27; d= 0.217).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DCD® and US can both be considered effective modalities for the treatment of latent MTrPs, having a longer duration of action with DCD® therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.