Tânia Madureira, Joana Magalhães, Pedro Vilas, Elsa Campôa, Paulo Luz, Filipe Coutinho
{"title":"在肿瘤科初次就诊时进行老年病筛查和综合老年病评估。","authors":"Tânia Madureira, Joana Magalhães, Pedro Vilas, Elsa Campôa, Paulo Luz, Filipe Coutinho","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-004822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geriatric oncology underscores the significance of assessing functional age in guiding medical decisions, endeavouring to delineate practical and efficacious methodologies for evaluating functionality, adapting therapeutic regimens and attenuating the risks of treatment-related deterioration.</p><p><strong>Objectives and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, we aimed to delineate the characteristics of older patients presenting for their initial oncology appointment by using geriatric screening (G8 score) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), while also assessing the feasibility of these evaluations. Secondary objectives included comparing the initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and any deviations from standard therapeutic strategies against the identified frailty in geriatric assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients exhibited a G8 score ≤14 and underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment. While oncologists typically perceive patients' general conditions, CGA enables a systematic assessment, providing a comprehensive characterisation of elderly patients to inform therapeutic decisions and address identified fragilities. The CGA highlighted vulnerabilities across all primary domains. Notably, even among patients with ECOG scores of 0 and 1, the application of G8 score and CGA revealed numerous fragilities. Consistent with existing literature, these scales offered additional insights beyond ECOG evaluation alone, suggesting their potential to guide therapeutic adaptations for this demographic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing research and continuous evaluation are imperative to refine and broaden the implementation of geriatric-focused interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"121-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geriatric screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment during initial oncology appointments.\",\"authors\":\"Tânia Madureira, Joana Magalhães, Pedro Vilas, Elsa Campôa, Paulo Luz, Filipe Coutinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2024-004822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geriatric oncology underscores the significance of assessing functional age in guiding medical decisions, endeavouring to delineate practical and efficacious methodologies for evaluating functionality, adapting therapeutic regimens and attenuating the risks of treatment-related deterioration.</p><p><strong>Objectives and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, we aimed to delineate the characteristics of older patients presenting for their initial oncology appointment by using geriatric screening (G8 score) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), while also assessing the feasibility of these evaluations. Secondary objectives included comparing the initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and any deviations from standard therapeutic strategies against the identified frailty in geriatric assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients exhibited a G8 score ≤14 and underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment. While oncologists typically perceive patients' general conditions, CGA enables a systematic assessment, providing a comprehensive characterisation of elderly patients to inform therapeutic decisions and address identified fragilities. The CGA highlighted vulnerabilities across all primary domains. Notably, even among patients with ECOG scores of 0 and 1, the application of G8 score and CGA revealed numerous fragilities. Consistent with existing literature, these scales offered additional insights beyond ECOG evaluation alone, suggesting their potential to guide therapeutic adaptations for this demographic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ongoing research and continuous evaluation are imperative to refine and broaden the implementation of geriatric-focused interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004822\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geriatric screening and comprehensive geriatric assessment during initial oncology appointments.
Introduction: Geriatric oncology underscores the significance of assessing functional age in guiding medical decisions, endeavouring to delineate practical and efficacious methodologies for evaluating functionality, adapting therapeutic regimens and attenuating the risks of treatment-related deterioration.
Objectives and methods: In this prospective study, we aimed to delineate the characteristics of older patients presenting for their initial oncology appointment by using geriatric screening (G8 score) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), while also assessing the feasibility of these evaluations. Secondary objectives included comparing the initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and any deviations from standard therapeutic strategies against the identified frailty in geriatric assessment.
Results: Most patients exhibited a G8 score ≤14 and underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment. While oncologists typically perceive patients' general conditions, CGA enables a systematic assessment, providing a comprehensive characterisation of elderly patients to inform therapeutic decisions and address identified fragilities. The CGA highlighted vulnerabilities across all primary domains. Notably, even among patients with ECOG scores of 0 and 1, the application of G8 score and CGA revealed numerous fragilities. Consistent with existing literature, these scales offered additional insights beyond ECOG evaluation alone, suggesting their potential to guide therapeutic adaptations for this demographic.
Conclusion: Ongoing research and continuous evaluation are imperative to refine and broaden the implementation of geriatric-focused interventions.
期刊介绍：
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
