非洲怀旧:当代黑人文化中的美好感觉》,作者 Badia Ahad-Legardy(评论)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Brittney Michelle Edmonds
{"title":"非洲怀旧:当代黑人文化中的美好感觉》,作者 Badia Ahad-Legardy(评论)","authors":"Brittney Michelle Edmonds","doi":"10.1353/afa.2023.a920508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em> by Badia Ahad-Legardy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brittney Michelle Edmonds </li> </ul> Badia Ahad-Legardy. <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em>. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2021. 224 pp. $26.95. <p><strong>I</strong>n <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em>, Badia Ahad-Legardy disrupts a cultural truism so commonplace as to seem absolute: <strong>[End Page 257]</strong> that historical nostalgia for Black people is an impossibility. On the monograph’s opening pages, Zadie Smith announces plainly, “I can’t go back to the fifties because life in the fifties for me is not pretty, nor is it pretty in 1320 or 1460 or 1580 or 1820 or even 1960 in [the US], very frankly” (2). Smith’s relatable understanding of nostalgia—as longing for a lost or for-gone era of the past—and her concomitant belief that a timeless antagonism exists between her, a Black woman, and her socioaffective ability to relate to historical memory, extends from a dominant but narrow and racialized conception of the psychological phenomenon.</p> <p>Ahad-Legardy sets out to marginalize that dominant conception, arguing that it renders agential relation to historical memory the exclusive province of whites. <em>Afro-Nostalgia</em> instead develops a more capacious definition of nostalgia to emphasize how contemporary Black cultural workers engage with historical memory to enact affective transformations, to stage political critiques, and to enact various forms of community. The study departs from the observation that nostalgia is not a “race-neutral mode of positive memory,” but instead extends from scientific histories that presumed Black intellectual and psychological incapacity (5). Ahad-Legardy traces the history of nostalgia back to its seventeenth-century conception, when it was first conceived as a cerebral ailment prompted by the material loss of one’s homeland, to the eighteenth century, when pioneering scientists suggested that Black people were perhaps the most substantially afflicted by the ailment, to the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when nostalgia was no longer conceived as ailment but as sentiment, as the sometimes overwhelming desire for a lost home or object or symbol of some better, more glorious past.</p> <p>Against the backdrop of renewed and virulent nostalgic sentiment in contemporary US politics and civic life, Ahad-Legardy turns to Black expressive culture—to literature, music, web media, visual arts, sculpture, and the culinary arts—to situate nostalgic feeling, specifically Afro-nostalgia, beyond conservative frames. Rather than a coping mechanism or maladaptive response to to an undesirable present, rather than a sentiment that eschews progressive politics in favor of fantastical regression, Afro-nostalgia seeks to “[look] back to feel good” without retreating into an idealized past (20). At its most simple, Afro-nostalgia is a set of strategies for relating to the past and reclaiming it as a site of and for pleasure. Even so, Ahad-Legardy is careful to delineate between forms of nostalgia that obscure or erase or revise history and the careful, imaginative play of the practitioners she examines. Afro-nostalgia is neither a barrier to informed, critical relationships to the past, nor is it absent political consciousness. Across four chapters, Ahad-Legardy conceptualizes Afro-nostalgia: its ability to act as a form of historical redress, to disrupt pervasive forms of white nostalgia, to cultivate well-being and pride among Black people and others, and to strategically reclaim various forms of culture-making and self-fashioning.</p> <p>In chapter one, “(Nostalgic) RETRIBUTION: The Power of the Petty in Contemporary Narratives of Slavery,” Ahad-Legardy reads contemporary narratives of slavery to demonstrate how cultural workers reckon with the antebellum past. Through retribution, contemporary Black artists psychically reconcile with the traumatic history of slavery. In contradistinction to prevalent <strong>[End Page 258]</strong> forms of white nostalgia that seek to preserve an imagined, fast-receding past through acts of violence and racial chauvinism, Afro-nostalgic retribution instrumentalizes the “emancipated voice of the contemporary black subject” to imagine enslaved subjects and subjectivities anew (33). While such a tendency has been under much scrutiny by scholars, Ahad-Legardy emphasizes that this tendency is nonetheless a prime example of the Afro-nostalgic imagination. Offering readings of Sherley Anne Williams’s <em>Dessa Rose</em>, Edward P. Jones’s <em>The Known World</em>, James...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture by Badia Ahad-Legardy (review)\",\"authors\":\"Brittney Michelle Edmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/afa.2023.a920508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em> by Badia Ahad-Legardy <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brittney Michelle Edmonds </li> </ul> Badia Ahad-Legardy. <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em>. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2021. 224 pp. $26.95. <p><strong>I</strong>n <em>Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture</em>, Badia Ahad-Legardy disrupts a cultural truism so commonplace as to seem absolute: <strong>[End Page 257]</strong> that historical nostalgia for Black people is an impossibility. On the monograph’s opening pages, Zadie Smith announces plainly, “I can’t go back to the fifties because life in the fifties for me is not pretty, nor is it pretty in 1320 or 1460 or 1580 or 1820 or even 1960 in [the US], very frankly” (2). Smith’s relatable understanding of nostalgia—as longing for a lost or for-gone era of the past—and her concomitant belief that a timeless antagonism exists between her, a Black woman, and her socioaffective ability to relate to historical memory, extends from a dominant but narrow and racialized conception of the psychological phenomenon.</p> <p>Ahad-Legardy sets out to marginalize that dominant conception, arguing that it renders agential relation to historical memory the exclusive province of whites. <em>Afro-Nostalgia</em> instead develops a more capacious definition of nostalgia to emphasize how contemporary Black cultural workers engage with historical memory to enact affective transformations, to stage political critiques, and to enact various forms of community. The study departs from the observation that nostalgia is not a “race-neutral mode of positive memory,” but instead extends from scientific histories that presumed Black intellectual and psychological incapacity (5). Ahad-Legardy traces the history of nostalgia back to its seventeenth-century conception, when it was first conceived as a cerebral ailment prompted by the material loss of one’s homeland, to the eighteenth century, when pioneering scientists suggested that Black people were perhaps the most substantially afflicted by the ailment, to the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when nostalgia was no longer conceived as ailment but as sentiment, as the sometimes overwhelming desire for a lost home or object or symbol of some better, more glorious past.</p> <p>Against the backdrop of renewed and virulent nostalgic sentiment in contemporary US politics and civic life, Ahad-Legardy turns to Black expressive culture—to literature, music, web media, visual arts, sculpture, and the culinary arts—to situate nostalgic feeling, specifically Afro-nostalgia, beyond conservative frames. Rather than a coping mechanism or maladaptive response to to an undesirable present, rather than a sentiment that eschews progressive politics in favor of fantastical regression, Afro-nostalgia seeks to “[look] back to feel good” without retreating into an idealized past (20). At its most simple, Afro-nostalgia is a set of strategies for relating to the past and reclaiming it as a site of and for pleasure. Even so, Ahad-Legardy is careful to delineate between forms of nostalgia that obscure or erase or revise history and the careful, imaginative play of the practitioners she examines. Afro-nostalgia is neither a barrier to informed, critical relationships to the past, nor is it absent political consciousness. Across four chapters, Ahad-Legardy conceptualizes Afro-nostalgia: its ability to act as a form of historical redress, to disrupt pervasive forms of white nostalgia, to cultivate well-being and pride among Black people and others, and to strategically reclaim various forms of culture-making and self-fashioning.</p> <p>In chapter one, “(Nostalgic) RETRIBUTION: The Power of the Petty in Contemporary Narratives of Slavery,” Ahad-Legardy reads contemporary narratives of slavery to demonstrate how cultural workers reckon with the antebellum past. Through retribution, contemporary Black artists psychically reconcile with the traumatic history of slavery. In contradistinction to prevalent <strong>[End Page 258]</strong> forms of white nostalgia that seek to preserve an imagined, fast-receding past through acts of violence and racial chauvinism, Afro-nostalgic retribution instrumentalizes the “emancipated voice of the contemporary black subject” to imagine enslaved subjects and subjectivities anew (33). While such a tendency has been under much scrutiny by scholars, Ahad-Legardy emphasizes that this tendency is nonetheless a prime example of the Afro-nostalgic imagination. Offering readings of Sherley Anne Williams’s <em>Dessa Rose</em>, Edward P. Jones’s <em>The Known World</em>, James...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2023.a920508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2023.a920508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 非洲怀旧:作者:Badia Ahad-Legardy Brittney Michelle Edmonds Badia Ahad-Legardy。非洲怀旧:当代黑人文化中的美好感觉》。Urbana:伊利诺伊大学出版社,2021 年。224 pp.$26.95.在《非洲怀旧:Badia Ahad-Legardy 在《Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture》一书中,打破了一个看似绝对的文化常识:[尾页 257]对黑人而言,历史怀旧是不可能的。在专著的开篇,扎迪-史密斯直截了当地宣布:"我无法回到五十年代,因为五十年代的生活对我来说并不美好,坦率地说,1320 年、1460 年、1580 年、1820 年甚至 1960 年(美国)的生活也不美好"(2)。史密斯对怀旧的理解是对过去失落或消失的时代的憧憬,她同时认为,在她这个黑人女性和她与历史记忆相关的社会情感能力之间存在着一种永恒的对立,她对怀旧的理解来自于对这一心理现象的一种主流的、狭隘的和种族化的概念。阿哈德-莱加迪试图将这种主流概念边缘化,认为它使得与历史记忆的互动关系成为白人的专利。相反,《非洲怀旧》为怀旧下了一个更宽泛的定义,强调当代黑人文化工作者如何与历史记忆打交道,以实现情感转变,进行政治批判,并建立各种形式的社区。该研究从怀旧并非 "种族中立的积极记忆模式 "这一观点出发,而是从假定黑人智力和心理不健全的科学史中延伸出来的(5)。阿哈德-莱加迪追溯了怀旧的历史,从十七世纪的怀旧概念(当时怀旧最初被认为是一种因失去故土而引发的脑部疾病)到十八世纪的怀旧概念(当时先驱科学家认为黑人可能是受怀旧困扰最严重的群体),再到十九世纪末和早期的怀旧概念、到了十九世纪末二十世纪初,怀旧不再被视为一种疾病,而是一种情感,是对失去的家园、物品或某种更美好、更辉煌的过去的象征的有时是压倒性的渴望。在当代美国政治和公民生活中怀旧情绪重新抬头且愈演愈烈的背景下,阿哈德-莱加迪转向黑人表现性文化--文学、音乐、网络媒体、视觉艺术、雕塑和烹饪艺术--将怀旧情绪,特别是非裔怀旧情绪置于保守的框架之外。非洲怀旧不是一种应对机制,也不是对不良现状的适应性反应,更不是一种摒弃进步政治而倾向于幻想倒退的情绪,非洲怀旧寻求的是"[回首]感觉良好",而不是退回到理想化的过去(20)。最简单地说,非洲怀旧是一套与过去相关联的策略,是将过去重新作为快乐的场所。即便如此,Ahad-Legardy 还是谨慎地将模糊、抹去或修改历史的怀旧形式与她所研究的实践者的细致、富有想象力的游戏形式区分开来。非洲怀旧既不会阻碍与过去建立知情的、批判性的关系,也不会缺乏政治意识。在四个章节中,阿哈德-莱加迪对非洲怀旧进行了概念化:非洲怀旧能够作为一种历史矫正形式,破坏普遍存在的白人怀旧形式,培养黑人和其他人的幸福感和自豪感,并战略性地重新找回各种形式的文化创造和自我塑造。在第一章"(怀旧)报复:当代奴隶制叙事中琐碎的力量 "中,阿哈德-莱加迪解读了当代奴隶制叙事,展示了文化工作者如何重新审视前铃铛时期的过去。通过报应,当代黑人艺术家从心理上与奴隶制的创伤历史达成了和解。白人怀旧试图通过暴力和种族沙文主义行为来保留想象中的快速消逝的过去,而非洲怀旧报应则将 "当代黑人主体解放的声音 "作为工具,重新想象被奴役的主体和主体性(33)。虽然这种倾向受到学者们的广泛关注,但阿哈德-莱加迪强调,这种倾向仍然是非洲怀旧想象力的一个典型例子。该书对谢利-安妮-威廉姆斯(Sherley Anne Williams)的《德莎-罗斯》(Dessa Rose)、爱德华-琼斯(Edward P. Jones)的《已知的世界》(The Known World)、詹姆斯-...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture by Badia Ahad-Legardy (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture by Badia Ahad-Legardy
  • Brittney Michelle Edmonds
Badia Ahad-Legardy. Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2021. 224 pp. $26.95.

In Afro-Nostalgia: Feeling Good in Contemporary Black Culture, Badia Ahad-Legardy disrupts a cultural truism so commonplace as to seem absolute: [End Page 257] that historical nostalgia for Black people is an impossibility. On the monograph’s opening pages, Zadie Smith announces plainly, “I can’t go back to the fifties because life in the fifties for me is not pretty, nor is it pretty in 1320 or 1460 or 1580 or 1820 or even 1960 in [the US], very frankly” (2). Smith’s relatable understanding of nostalgia—as longing for a lost or for-gone era of the past—and her concomitant belief that a timeless antagonism exists between her, a Black woman, and her socioaffective ability to relate to historical memory, extends from a dominant but narrow and racialized conception of the psychological phenomenon.

Ahad-Legardy sets out to marginalize that dominant conception, arguing that it renders agential relation to historical memory the exclusive province of whites. Afro-Nostalgia instead develops a more capacious definition of nostalgia to emphasize how contemporary Black cultural workers engage with historical memory to enact affective transformations, to stage political critiques, and to enact various forms of community. The study departs from the observation that nostalgia is not a “race-neutral mode of positive memory,” but instead extends from scientific histories that presumed Black intellectual and psychological incapacity (5). Ahad-Legardy traces the history of nostalgia back to its seventeenth-century conception, when it was first conceived as a cerebral ailment prompted by the material loss of one’s homeland, to the eighteenth century, when pioneering scientists suggested that Black people were perhaps the most substantially afflicted by the ailment, to the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when nostalgia was no longer conceived as ailment but as sentiment, as the sometimes overwhelming desire for a lost home or object or symbol of some better, more glorious past.

Against the backdrop of renewed and virulent nostalgic sentiment in contemporary US politics and civic life, Ahad-Legardy turns to Black expressive culture—to literature, music, web media, visual arts, sculpture, and the culinary arts—to situate nostalgic feeling, specifically Afro-nostalgia, beyond conservative frames. Rather than a coping mechanism or maladaptive response to to an undesirable present, rather than a sentiment that eschews progressive politics in favor of fantastical regression, Afro-nostalgia seeks to “[look] back to feel good” without retreating into an idealized past (20). At its most simple, Afro-nostalgia is a set of strategies for relating to the past and reclaiming it as a site of and for pleasure. Even so, Ahad-Legardy is careful to delineate between forms of nostalgia that obscure or erase or revise history and the careful, imaginative play of the practitioners she examines. Afro-nostalgia is neither a barrier to informed, critical relationships to the past, nor is it absent political consciousness. Across four chapters, Ahad-Legardy conceptualizes Afro-nostalgia: its ability to act as a form of historical redress, to disrupt pervasive forms of white nostalgia, to cultivate well-being and pride among Black people and others, and to strategically reclaim various forms of culture-making and self-fashioning.

In chapter one, “(Nostalgic) RETRIBUTION: The Power of the Petty in Contemporary Narratives of Slavery,” Ahad-Legardy reads contemporary narratives of slavery to demonstrate how cultural workers reckon with the antebellum past. Through retribution, contemporary Black artists psychically reconcile with the traumatic history of slavery. In contradistinction to prevalent [End Page 258] forms of white nostalgia that seek to preserve an imagined, fast-receding past through acts of violence and racial chauvinism, Afro-nostalgic retribution instrumentalizes the “emancipated voice of the contemporary black subject” to imagine enslaved subjects and subjectivities anew (33). While such a tendency has been under much scrutiny by scholars, Ahad-Legardy emphasizes that this tendency is nonetheless a prime example of the Afro-nostalgic imagination. Offering readings of Sherley Anne Williams’s Dessa Rose, Edward P. Jones’s The Known World, James...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信