Android 应用程序崩溃该归咎于谁?规模化深入研究与实用解决方案

IF 3.9 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Liangyi Gong, Hao Lin, Daibo Liu, Lanqi Yang, Hongyi Wang, Jiaxing Qiu, Zhenhua Li, Feng Qian
{"title":"Android 应用程序崩溃该归咎于谁?规模化深入研究与实用解决方案","authors":"Liangyi Gong, Hao Lin, Daibo Liu, Lanqi Yang, Hongyi Wang, Jiaxing Qiu, Zhenhua Li, Feng Qian","doi":"10.1145/3649895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Android system has been widely deployed in energy-constrained IoT devices for many practical applications, such as smart phone, smart home, healthcare, fitness, and beacons. However, Android users oftentimes suffer from app crashes, which directly disrupt user experience and could lead to data loss. Till now, the community have limited understanding of their prevalence, characteristics, and root causes. In this paper, we make an in-depth study of the crash events regarding ten very popular apps of different genres, based on fine-grained system-level traces crowd-sourced from 93 million Android devices. We find that app crashes occur prevalently on the various hardware models studied, and better hardware does not seem to essentially relieve the problem. Most importantly, we unravel multi-fold root causes of app crashes, and pinpoint that the most crashes stem from the subtle yet crucial inconsistency between app developers’ supposed memory/process management model and Android’s actual implementations. We design practical approaches to addressing the inconsistency; after large-scale deployment, they reduce 40.4% of the app crashes with negligible system overhead. In addition, we summarize important lessons learned from this study, and have released our measurement code/data to the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50910,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Should We Blame for Android App Crashes? An In-Depth Study at Scale and Practical Resolutions\",\"authors\":\"Liangyi Gong, Hao Lin, Daibo Liu, Lanqi Yang, Hongyi Wang, Jiaxing Qiu, Zhenhua Li, Feng Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3649895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Android system has been widely deployed in energy-constrained IoT devices for many practical applications, such as smart phone, smart home, healthcare, fitness, and beacons. However, Android users oftentimes suffer from app crashes, which directly disrupt user experience and could lead to data loss. Till now, the community have limited understanding of their prevalence, characteristics, and root causes. In this paper, we make an in-depth study of the crash events regarding ten very popular apps of different genres, based on fine-grained system-level traces crowd-sourced from 93 million Android devices. We find that app crashes occur prevalently on the various hardware models studied, and better hardware does not seem to essentially relieve the problem. Most importantly, we unravel multi-fold root causes of app crashes, and pinpoint that the most crashes stem from the subtle yet crucial inconsistency between app developers’ supposed memory/process management model and Android’s actual implementations. We design practical approaches to addressing the inconsistency; after large-scale deployment, they reduce 40.4% of the app crashes with negligible system overhead. In addition, we summarize important lessons learned from this study, and have released our measurement code/data to the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3649895\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3649895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安卓系统已被广泛应用于智能手机、智能家居、医疗保健、健身和信标等能源受限的物联网设备中。然而,安卓用户经常会遇到应用程序崩溃的问题,这直接影响了用户体验,并可能导致数据丢失。迄今为止,社会各界对其发生率、特点和根本原因的了解还很有限。在本文中,我们基于从 9,300 万台安卓设备中收集到的细粒度系统级跟踪数据,深入研究了十款不同类型的热门应用程序的崩溃事件。我们发现,在所研究的各种硬件型号上都普遍存在应用程序崩溃现象,而更好的硬件似乎并不能从根本上缓解这一问题。最重要的是,我们揭示了应用程序崩溃的多重根源,并指出大多数崩溃都源于应用程序开发人员假定的内存/进程管理模型与安卓实际实现之间微妙而关键的不一致。我们设计了解决不一致问题的实用方法;经过大规模部署,这些方法减少了 40.4% 的应用程序崩溃,而系统开销却微乎其微。此外,我们还总结了这项研究的重要经验,并向社区发布了我们的测量代码/数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Should We Blame for Android App Crashes? An In-Depth Study at Scale and Practical Resolutions

Android system has been widely deployed in energy-constrained IoT devices for many practical applications, such as smart phone, smart home, healthcare, fitness, and beacons. However, Android users oftentimes suffer from app crashes, which directly disrupt user experience and could lead to data loss. Till now, the community have limited understanding of their prevalence, characteristics, and root causes. In this paper, we make an in-depth study of the crash events regarding ten very popular apps of different genres, based on fine-grained system-level traces crowd-sourced from 93 million Android devices. We find that app crashes occur prevalently on the various hardware models studied, and better hardware does not seem to essentially relieve the problem. Most importantly, we unravel multi-fold root causes of app crashes, and pinpoint that the most crashes stem from the subtle yet crucial inconsistency between app developers’ supposed memory/process management model and Android’s actual implementations. We design practical approaches to addressing the inconsistency; after large-scale deployment, they reduce 40.4% of the app crashes with negligible system overhead. In addition, we summarize important lessons learned from this study, and have released our measurement code/data to the community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) is a central publication by the ACM in the interdisciplinary area of sensor networks spanning a broad discipline from signal processing, networking and protocols, embedded systems, information management, to distributed algorithms. It covers research contributions that introduce new concepts, techniques, analyses, or architectures, as well as applied contributions that report on development of new tools and systems or experiences and experiments with high-impact, innovative applications. The Transactions places special attention on contributions to systemic approaches to sensor networks as well as fundamental contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信