在人类活动的环境中,森林碎片和同类栖息地对维持非嗜肺蝙蝠的生存具有重要意义

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jeanneson Sales, Patrício Adriano da Rocha
{"title":"在人类活动的环境中,森林碎片和同类栖息地对维持非嗜肺蝙蝠的生存具有重要意义","authors":"Jeanneson Sales, Patrício Adriano da Rocha","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Impacts of urbanization can affect bat species differently, some bat assemblages demonstrated differences in their activity and richness between forest environments and urban areas. Bats species can seek refuge in green areas (urban forest remnants, parks and groves) or in buildings within the urban landscape. Using bioacoustics, we examined habitat use of by non-phyllostomid bats in a large Metropolitan Region of João Pessoa-PB, northeastern Brazil, comparing the activity and species/sonotypes composition of bat assemblages documented in Atlantic Forest remnants (FF) with those in the urbanized matrix areas (UM). Fifteen species belonging to four families were recorded. Out of these records, 11 were documented in both UM and FF, while <i>Neoplatymops mattogrossensis</i>, <i>Myotis</i> cf. <i>riparius</i>, and <i>Rhynchonycteris naso</i> were exclusively found in FF, and <i>Promops nasutus</i> (first record for the state) was only found in UM. The richness and activity of bats differed between FF and UM. <i>Molossops temminckii</i> and <i>Promops nasutus</i> were observed solely in arboreal habitats, whether in the forest fragments or in the UM areas. Only <i>Cynomops planirostris</i>, <i>Eumops</i> sp., M<i>olossus molossus</i>, <i>Molossus rufus</i>, and <i>Promops centralis</i> were recorded in strictly urban habitats, and they did not show differences in activities between FF and UM. These results indicate the ability of these bats to adapt to structural habitat changes within an urban matrix, reaching the highest levels of synanthropy. Our results demonstrate that the impact of urbanization on bat assemblages can be mitigated by maintaining green areas within an urban matrix.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relevance of forest fragments and synanthropic habitats for the maintenance of non-phyllostomid bats in an anthropogenic matrix\",\"authors\":\"Jeanneson Sales, Patrício Adriano da Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Impacts of urbanization can affect bat species differently, some bat assemblages demonstrated differences in their activity and richness between forest environments and urban areas. Bats species can seek refuge in green areas (urban forest remnants, parks and groves) or in buildings within the urban landscape. Using bioacoustics, we examined habitat use of by non-phyllostomid bats in a large Metropolitan Region of João Pessoa-PB, northeastern Brazil, comparing the activity and species/sonotypes composition of bat assemblages documented in Atlantic Forest remnants (FF) with those in the urbanized matrix areas (UM). Fifteen species belonging to four families were recorded. Out of these records, 11 were documented in both UM and FF, while <i>Neoplatymops mattogrossensis</i>, <i>Myotis</i> cf. <i>riparius</i>, and <i>Rhynchonycteris naso</i> were exclusively found in FF, and <i>Promops nasutus</i> (first record for the state) was only found in UM. The richness and activity of bats differed between FF and UM. <i>Molossops temminckii</i> and <i>Promops nasutus</i> were observed solely in arboreal habitats, whether in the forest fragments or in the UM areas. Only <i>Cynomops planirostris</i>, <i>Eumops</i> sp., M<i>olossus molossus</i>, <i>Molossus rufus</i>, and <i>Promops centralis</i> were recorded in strictly urban habitats, and they did not show differences in activities between FF and UM. These results indicate the ability of these bats to adapt to structural habitat changes within an urban matrix, reaching the highest levels of synanthropy. Our results demonstrate that the impact of urbanization on bat assemblages can be mitigated by maintaining green areas within an urban matrix.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Ecosystems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01523-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市化的影响会对蝙蝠物种产生不同的影响,一些蝙蝠群落在森林环境和城市地区之间的活动和丰富程度存在差异。蝙蝠物种可以在绿地(城市森林遗迹、公园和小树林)或城市景观中的建筑物中寻求庇护。我们利用生物声学研究了巴西东北部若昂-佩索阿大都会区(João Pessoa-PB)非瓣鳃目蝙蝠对栖息地的利用情况,比较了大西洋森林遗迹(FF)和城市化基质区(UM)记录的蝙蝠群的活动和物种/单型组成。记录了属于四个科的 15 个物种。在这些记录中,有 11 种在 UM 和 FF 中都有记录,而 Neoplatymops mattogrossensis、Myotis cf. riparius 和 Rhynchonycteris naso 只在 FF 中发现,Promops nasutus(该州首次记录)只在 UM 中发现。FF 和 UM 的蝙蝠数量和活动情况各不相同。Molossops temminckii 和 Promops nasutus 只在树栖栖息地被观察到,无论是在森林片区还是在 UM 地区。只有 Cynomops planirostris、Eumops sp.、Molossus molossus、Molossus rufus 和 Promops centralis 在严格意义上的城市栖息地被记录到,而且它们的活动在 FF 和 UM 之间没有显示出差异。这些结果表明,这些蝙蝠能够适应城市矩阵中栖息地结构的变化,达到最高的同类活动水平。我们的研究结果表明,城市化对蝙蝠群落的影响可以通过在城市基质中保持绿地来缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relevance of forest fragments and synanthropic habitats for the maintenance of non-phyllostomid bats in an anthropogenic matrix

Relevance of forest fragments and synanthropic habitats for the maintenance of non-phyllostomid bats in an anthropogenic matrix

Impacts of urbanization can affect bat species differently, some bat assemblages demonstrated differences in their activity and richness between forest environments and urban areas. Bats species can seek refuge in green areas (urban forest remnants, parks and groves) or in buildings within the urban landscape. Using bioacoustics, we examined habitat use of by non-phyllostomid bats in a large Metropolitan Region of João Pessoa-PB, northeastern Brazil, comparing the activity and species/sonotypes composition of bat assemblages documented in Atlantic Forest remnants (FF) with those in the urbanized matrix areas (UM). Fifteen species belonging to four families were recorded. Out of these records, 11 were documented in both UM and FF, while Neoplatymops mattogrossensis, Myotis cf. riparius, and Rhynchonycteris naso were exclusively found in FF, and Promops nasutus (first record for the state) was only found in UM. The richness and activity of bats differed between FF and UM. Molossops temminckii and Promops nasutus were observed solely in arboreal habitats, whether in the forest fragments or in the UM areas. Only Cynomops planirostris, Eumops sp., Molossus molossus, Molossus rufus, and Promops centralis were recorded in strictly urban habitats, and they did not show differences in activities between FF and UM. These results indicate the ability of these bats to adapt to structural habitat changes within an urban matrix, reaching the highest levels of synanthropy. Our results demonstrate that the impact of urbanization on bat assemblages can be mitigated by maintaining green areas within an urban matrix.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信