规划孕产妇免疫接种的未来:从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取经验教训。

Dana Meaney-Delman, Sarah Carroll, Kara Polen, Tara C Jatlaoui, Sarah Meyer, Sara Oliver, Julianne Gee, Tom Shimabukuro, Hilda Razzaghi, Laura Riley, Romeo R Galang, Van Tong, Suzanne Gilboa, Sascha Ellington, Amanda Cohn
{"title":"规划孕产妇免疫接种的未来:从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取经验教训。","authors":"Dana Meaney-Delman, Sarah Carroll, Kara Polen, Tara C Jatlaoui, Sarah Meyer, Sara Oliver, Julianne Gee, Tom Shimabukuro, Hilda Razzaghi, Laura Riley, Romeo R Galang, Van Tong, Suzanne Gilboa, Sascha Ellington, Amanda Cohn","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, the clinical and public health community raced to understand SARS-CoV-2 infection and develop life-saving vaccines. Pregnant persons were disproportionately impacted, experiencing more severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes. And yet, when COVID-19 vaccines became available in late 2020, safety and efficacy data were not available to inform their use during pregnancy because pregnant persons were excluded from pre-authorization clinical trials. Concerns about vaccine safety during pregnancy and misinformation linking vaccination and infertility circulated widely, creating a lack of vaccine confidence. Many pregnant people initially chose not to get vaccinated, and while vaccination rates rose after safety and effectiveness data became available, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was suboptimal and varied across racial and ethnic distribution of the pregnant population. The COVID-19 pandemic experience provided valuable insights that can inform current and future approaches to maternal vaccination against.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning for the future of maternal immunization: Building on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Meaney-Delman, Sarah Carroll, Kara Polen, Tara C Jatlaoui, Sarah Meyer, Sara Oliver, Julianne Gee, Tom Shimabukuro, Hilda Razzaghi, Laura Riley, Romeo R Galang, Van Tong, Suzanne Gilboa, Sascha Ellington, Amanda Cohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, the clinical and public health community raced to understand SARS-CoV-2 infection and develop life-saving vaccines. Pregnant persons were disproportionately impacted, experiencing more severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes. And yet, when COVID-19 vaccines became available in late 2020, safety and efficacy data were not available to inform their use during pregnancy because pregnant persons were excluded from pre-authorization clinical trials. Concerns about vaccine safety during pregnancy and misinformation linking vaccination and infertility circulated widely, creating a lack of vaccine confidence. Many pregnant people initially chose not to get vaccinated, and while vaccination rates rose after safety and effectiveness data became available, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was suboptimal and varied across racial and ethnic distribution of the pregnant population. The COVID-19 pandemic experience provided valuable insights that can inform current and future approaches to maternal vaccination against.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着 COVID-19 在全球范围内的大流行,临床和公共卫生界急需了解 SARS-CoV-2 感染并开发救命疫苗。孕妇受到的影响尤为严重,她们经历了更严重的疾病和不良妊娠结局。然而,当 COVID-19 疫苗于 2020 年末上市时,由于孕妇被排除在授权前临床试验之外,因此没有安全和有效性数据来指导孕期使用。对孕期疫苗安全性的担忧以及将接种疫苗与不孕症联系起来的错误信息广为流传,导致人们对疫苗缺乏信心。许多孕妇起初选择不接种疫苗,虽然在获得安全性和有效性数据后接种率有所上升,但 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度并不理想,而且不同种族和民族的孕妇接种率也不尽相同。COVID-19 大流行的经验提供了宝贵的启示,可为当前和未来的孕产妇疫苗接种方法提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning for the future of maternal immunization: Building on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

As the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, the clinical and public health community raced to understand SARS-CoV-2 infection and develop life-saving vaccines. Pregnant persons were disproportionately impacted, experiencing more severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes. And yet, when COVID-19 vaccines became available in late 2020, safety and efficacy data were not available to inform their use during pregnancy because pregnant persons were excluded from pre-authorization clinical trials. Concerns about vaccine safety during pregnancy and misinformation linking vaccination and infertility circulated widely, creating a lack of vaccine confidence. Many pregnant people initially chose not to get vaccinated, and while vaccination rates rose after safety and effectiveness data became available, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was suboptimal and varied across racial and ethnic distribution of the pregnant population. The COVID-19 pandemic experience provided valuable insights that can inform current and future approaches to maternal vaccination against.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信